Human Body-Car Seat Coupling Under Rear Impact

The development of new protective systems must be performed on reliable tools and representative of a live human. In an earlier study a simplified and realistic model of the head-neck system under moderate rear impact was performed. It is clear and often addressed in the literature that under such an impact configuration, the deformation of the torso and the car seat, is of extreme importance and defines the initial conditions of the head-neck system. In order to address this issue, an original lumped model of the human torso was developed in the present study and coupled to a car seat-head rest complex. The hypothesis of linear behavior was used for the torso being subjected to small deformations. The modal analysis of the human torso in a seating position conduced by Kitazaki and Griffin in 1992 was used in this study for both masses and mechanical properties identification. In order to reproduce the four mode shapes identified experimentally the torso was divided in six segments to obtain the five degrees of freedom with the head neck system. This model of minimum complexity but ability to reproduce the 5 first experimental vibration modes was validated in the frequency domain in terms of natural frequencies and damping as well as mode shapes. In addition to the lumped approach, an external geometry was implemented in order to couple the human body model to a finite element model of the car seat also developed in the present studies. Rear impact simulations for the two different configurations (flexible and rigid torso) showed an increase of about 35% for the maximum T1 acceleration and an increase of about 65% for the acceleration slope when a rigid torso is considered. Realistic body behavior and accurate T1 acceleration are essential aspects in real world accident reconstruction as well as for seat-head rest evaluation and optimization against neck loading.

[1]  A I King,et al.  Effects of bending on the vertebral column during +Gz acceleration. , 1970, Aerospace medicine.

[2]  Mats Y. Svensson,et al.  Analysis of different head and neck responses in rear-end car collisions using a new humanlike mathematical model , 1994 .

[3]  R Willinger,et al.  Human Neck Finite Element Model Development and Validation against Original Experimental Data. , 2004, Stapp car crash journal.

[4]  Priya Prasad,et al.  BIOFIDELITY OF ANTHROPOMORPHIC TEST DEVICES FOR REAR IMPACT , 1997 .

[5]  Linda Eriksson Neck Injury Risk in Rear-End Impacts. Risk Factors and Neck Injury Criterion Evaluation with Madymo Modelling and Real-Life Data , 2004 .

[6]  M Y Svensson,et al.  The influence of seat-back and head-restraint properties on the head-neck motion during rear-impact. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Jac Wismans,et al.  Development and evaluation of a new rear-impact crash dummy: the RID2 , 2001 .

[8]  Rémy Willinger,et al.  Modal analysis of the human neck in vivo as a criterion for crash test dummy evaluation , 2005 .

[9]  J. Hess,et al.  Theoretical investigations of dynamic response of man to high vertical accelerations. , 1958, The Journal of aviation medicine.

[10]  J Berliner,et al.  A Comparison of the Hybrid III and BioRID II Dummies in Low-Severity, Rear-Impact Sled Tests. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[11]  J B Welcher,et al.  Influence of Seat Foam and Geometrical Properties on BioRID P3 Kinematic Response to Rear Impacts , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[12]  G. Siegmund,et al.  Kinetic and Kinematic Responses of the RID2a, Hybrid III and Human Volunteers in Low-Speed Rear-End Collisions. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[13]  E. P. Hanavan,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF THE HUMAN BODY. AMRL-TR-64-102. , 1964, AMRL-TR. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories.

[14]  D C Viano,et al.  Biomechanics of the human chest, abdomen, and pelvis in lateral impact. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  T. Szabo,et al.  Human Subject Kinematics and Electromyographic Activity During Low Speed Rear Impacts , 1996 .

[16]  M. Griffin,et al.  Resonance behaviour of the seated human body and effects of posture. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Ernest P Hanavan,et al.  A mathematical model of the human body , 1964 .

[18]  M. J. Wolanin,et al.  HYBRID III - A BIOMECHANICALLY-BASED CRASH TEST DUMMY , 1977 .

[19]  J Wismans,et al.  Comparison of the Rear Impact Biofidelity of BioRID II and RID2. , 2002, Stapp car crash journal.

[20]  Naoki Okano,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF PROTOTYPE SEATS USING BIORID-P3 AND HYBRID III WITH TRID NECK , 2000 .

[21]  Arno Eichberger,et al.  COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT CAR SEATS REGARDING HEAD-NECK KINEMATICS OF VOLUNTEERS DURING REAR END IMPACT , 1997 .

[22]  Alan M. Nahum,et al.  Impact tolerance and response of the human thorax II , 1971 .

[23]  V. R. Hodgson,et al.  The Determination of Response Characteristics of the Head with Emphasis on Mechanical Impedance Techniques , 1967 .

[24]  C. E. Clauser,et al.  Weight, volume, and center of mass of segments of the human body , 1969 .

[25]  Mats Y. Svensson,et al.  A COMPARISON BETWEEN VOLUNTEER, BIORID P3 AND HYBRID III PERFORMANCE IN REAR IMPACTS , 1999 .

[26]  R L Stalnaker,et al.  Driving point impedance characteristics of the head. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.