A Study on the Functional Reliability of Gravity Dam

The research objective is to design and construct a method for functional reliability analysis of concrete gravity dam. Firstly, the pseudo excitation method was utilized to analyze to calculate the probabilistic characteristics of concrete gravity dam excited by random seismic loading. Meanwhile, the response surface method based on weighted regression was associated to that method to analyze functional reliability of concrete gravity dam. Eventually, a test example was given to verify and analyze the convergence and stability of this method.

[1]  Xu Guo,et al.  Computer simulation of structural random loading identification , 2001 .

[2]  Jie Li,et al.  Response analysis of stochastic parameter structures under non-stationary random excitation , 2001 .

[3]  Jiahao Lin,et al.  Accurate and highly efficient algorithms for structural stationary/non-stationary random responses , 2001 .

[4]  Jm M. Ko,et al.  Pseudo-excitation method for vibration analysis of wind-excited structures , 1999 .

[5]  Hakim Naceur,et al.  Response Surface Method for the Rapid Design of Process Parameters in Tube Hydroforming , 2007 .

[6]  Qiusheng Li,et al.  Seismic random vibration analysis of tall buildings , 2004 .

[7]  S. D. Xue,et al.  Random Vibration Study of Structures under Multi-Component Seismic Excitations , 2002 .

[8]  J. B. Wang,et al.  A second-order third-moment method for calculating the reliability of fatigue , 1999 .

[9]  Yl L. Xu,et al.  FULLY COUPLED BUFFETING ANALYSIS OF LONG-SPAN CABLE-SUPPORTED BRIDGES: FORMULATION , 1999 .

[10]  Jm M. Ko,et al.  Fully coupled buffeting analysis of Tsing Ma suspension bridge , 2000 .

[11]  J. Tu,et al.  An Indicator Response Surface Method for Simulation-Based Reliability Analysis , 2008 .

[12]  P. Das,et al.  Improved response surface method and its application to stiffened plate reliability analysis , 2000 .

[13]  E. Vanmarcke,et al.  Seismic Random‐Vibration Analysis of Multisupport‐Structural Systems , 1994 .

[14]  Mark E. Orazem,et al.  A weighted nonlinear regression-based inverse model for interpretation of pipeline survey data , 2004 .

[15]  Jianyun Chen,et al.  Improved response surface method for anti-slide reliability analysis of gravity dam based on weighted regression , 2010 .

[16]  Lu Zhen RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD FOR RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF IMPLICIT LIMIT STATE EQUATION BASED ON WEIGHTED REGRESSION , 2006 .

[17]  H. U. Köylüoglu,et al.  New Approximations for SORM Integrals , 1994 .

[18]  You-Lin Xu,et al.  Buffeting analysis of long span bridges: a new algorithm , 1998 .

[19]  Yl L. Xu,et al.  Dynamic characteristics and seismic response of adjacent buildings linked by discrete dampers , 1999 .

[20]  Yl L. Xu,et al.  Dynamic response of damper-connected adjacent buildings under earthquake excitation , 1999 .

[21]  Yong Sun,et al.  Non-stationary random seismic responses of non-uniform beams , 1995 .

[22]  Qiusheng Li,et al.  A new artificial neural network-based response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2008 .

[23]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Response spectrum method for multi‐support seismic excitations , 1992 .

[24]  Frederic Ward Williams,et al.  Seismic spatial effects for long-span bridges, using the pseudo excitation method , 2004 .

[25]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates , 2001 .

[26]  C. Manohar,et al.  Improved Response Surface Method for Time-Variant Reliability Analysis of Nonlinear Random Structures Under Non-Stationary Excitations , 2004 .

[27]  Lin Jia-hao,et al.  A fast CQC algorithm of psd matrices for random seismic responses , 1992 .

[28]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization , 2004 .

[29]  Haiyan Zhao,et al.  Adaptive and Iterative Least Squares Support Vector Regression based on Quadratic Renyi Entropy , 2008, GrC.

[30]  H. Gomes,et al.  COMPARISON OF RESPONSE SURFACE AND NEURAL NETWORK WITH OTHER METHODS FOR STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[31]  Linda J. Moore,et al.  Comparisons with the best in response surface methodology , 1999 .

[32]  Fred Moses,et al.  A sequential response surface method and its application in the reliability analysis of aircraft structural systems , 1994 .

[33]  I. Kaymaz,et al.  A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis , 2005 .

[34]  Henri P. Gavin,et al.  High-order limit state functions in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2008 .

[35]  Kostas Triantafyllopoulos,et al.  Multivariate discount weighted regression and local level models , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[36]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Multiple design points in first and second-order reliability , 1998 .

[37]  Frederic Ward Williams,et al.  Accurate high-speed computation of non-stationary random structural response , 1997 .

[38]  Yuan Xue-xia Response surface method based on LS-SVM for structural reliability analysis , 2007 .

[39]  Yl L. Xu,et al.  Closed‐form solution for seismic response of adjacent buildings with linear quadratic Gaussian controllers , 2002 .

[40]  Christian Onof,et al.  An adaptive response surface method for reliability analysis of structures with multiple loading sequences , 2005 .

[41]  A. Sellier,et al.  Adaptive response surface method based on a double weighted regression technique , 2009 .