Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software: An Illustration of Limitations and Advantages

Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) is a well-known acronym in qualitative research. Nowadays, qualitative researchers are inclined to apply such software for various purposes. Critiques of the use of CAQDAS in qualitative research focus on the term “analysis”, claiming that that the tool does little to analyze data. According to these critiques, some users of CAQDAS advocate a positivist or quantitative approach using CAQDAS as a so-called “devil-tool” for science. In contrast, although the use of CAQDAS can be seen to do the mechanical part of the analysis (i.e. coding), it can never fulfill the conceptual part of the analysis which requires a human-touch. Thus the better use of CAQDAS is for coding, not for analysis. This research paper attempts to illustrate the challenges of manual versus computer assisted coding by identifying events that create gaps during an ISD change process using a grounded theory methodology (GTM).

[1]  R. Yin.  Discovering the Future of the Case Study. Method in Evaluation Research , 1994 .

[2]  Celia Brackenridge,et al.  Using Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software to Develop a Grounded Theory Project , 2004 .

[3]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[4]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Nigel Fielding,et al.  Using Computers in Qualitative Research , 1991 .

[6]  M Morison,et al.  The role of computer software in the analysis of qualitative data: efficient clerk, research assistant or Trojan horse? , 1998, Journal of advanced nursing.

[7]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[8]  Dave Oliver,et al.  Justifying enterprise resource planning adoption , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[9]  K. Roberts,et al.  ICT and the Research Process: Issues Around the Compatibility of Technology with Qualitative Data Analysis , 2002 .

[10]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory methodology: An overview. , 1994 .

[11]  Charles Møller,et al.  Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems , 2004 .

[12]  B. Glaser.  The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis , 1965 .

[13]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[14]  Robert Thompson.  Reporting the Results of Computer-assisted Analysis of Qualitative Research Data , 2002 .

[15]  U. Kelle.  Theory Building in Qualitative Research and Computer Programs for the Management of Textual Data , 1997 .

[16]  Kristi Jackson,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo , 2007 .

[17]  C Webb,et al.  Analysing qualitative data: computerized and other approaches. , 1999, Journal of advanced nursing.

[18]  Paul Dupuis,et al.  Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods and Practice , 1995 .

[19]  Elizabeth Chell,et al.  Critical incident technique. , 2003 .

[20]  L G Moseley,et al.  Applying lexical and semantic analysis to the exploration of free-text data. , 1997, Nurse researcher.

[21]  I. Dey.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists , 1993 .

[22]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  Using grounded theory in interpretive management accounting research , 2008 .

[23]  A. Coffey,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: Technologies and Representations , 1996 .

[24]  Jan Weglarz,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[25]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Sequential patterns in information systems development: an application of a social process model , 1996, TOIS.

[26]  J. Carvalho,et al.  Use of Grounded Theory in Information Systems Area: An Exploratory Analysis , 2002 .

[27]  Nigel Fielding,et al.  ‘Qualitative Data Analysis: Representations of a Technology: A Comment on Coffey, Holbrook and Atkinson’ , 1996 .

[28]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Information Systems Research: A Case Study , 1988, MIS Q..

[29]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Grazyna Paliwoda-Pekosz,et al.  What are real problems in enterprise system adoption? , 2009, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[31]  C. Urquhart.  An encounter with grounded theory: tackling the practical and philosophical issues , 2001 .