Understanding Knowledge Transfer in Enterprise System Assimilation: The Critical Role of Socialization Tactics

It is critical to the success of enterprise systems (ES) assimilation that employees acquire sufficient knowledge and apply the knowledge effectively in routine system use. Drawing from knowledge management and socialization theories, we develop a theoretical model for better understanding how management could exercise socialization tactics to promote the transfer of knowledge, and thus improve the knowledge application outcomes in ES assimilation. We validate the model through survey data from employees in 14 companies which have implemented ES for more than one year in China. We find that socialization tactics strongly impact the properties of knowledge acquisition (depth, breadth, and linkage), which in turn influences knowledge application by users (habitual and extended use). Interesting, while the depth of knowledge impacts the breadth and linkage of knowledge, it does not have a significant direct impact on knowledge application. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  P. Callero,et al.  Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior , 1988 .

[3]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  Toward a theory of organizational socialization , 1977 .

[4]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[5]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[7]  Gareth R. Jones.  Socialization Tactics, Self-Efficacy, and Newcomers' Adjustments to Organizations , 1986 .

[8]  Ping Wang,et al.  Community Learning in Information Technology Innovation , 2009, MIS Q..

[9]  Wei Wang,et al.  ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University , 2022 .

[10]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Knowledge Collaboration Among Professionals Protecting National Security: Role of Transactive Memories in Ego-Centered Knowledge Networks , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  A Knowledge-Based Model of Radical Innovation in Small Software Firms , 2012, MIS Q..

[12]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  The Effects of Social Network Structure on Enterprise Systems Success: A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Chuan-Hoo Tan,et al.  Inducing Intrinsic Motivation to Explore the Enterprise System: The Supremacy of Organizational Levers , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Ryad Titah,et al.  Information System Use - Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[16]  Moez Limayem,et al.  How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance , 2007, MIS Q..

[17]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  The Role of Aggregation in the Measurement of IT-Related Organizational Innovation , 2001, MIS Q..

[18]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[19]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Multi-Project Model of Key Factors Affecting Organizational Benefits from Enterprise Systems , 2010, MIS Q..

[20]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  The Effectiveness of Knowledge Transfer Portfolios in Software Process Improvement: A Field Study , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  Switching Cognitive Gears: From Habits of Mind to Active Thinking , 1991 .

[22]  William R. King,et al.  Antecedents of Knowledge Transfer from Consultants to Clients in Enterprise System Implementations , 2005, MIS Q..

[23]  H. Klein,et al.  Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences. , 1994 .

[24]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  The Embeddedness of Information Systems Habits in Organizational and Individual Level Routines: Development and Disruption , 2013, MIS Q..

[25]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Postimplementation Knowledge Transfers to Users and Information Technology Professionals , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[27]  Tae-Yeol Kim,et al.  Socialization Tactics, Employee Proactivity, and Person-Organization Fit , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Bradley R. Staats,et al.  Breaking Them in or Eliciting Their Best? Reframing Socialization around Newcomers’ Authentic Self-expression , 2013 .

[30]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Training, Technical Complexity, and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation , 2007, MIS Q..

[31]  P. Attewell.  Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing , 1992 .

[32]  Ping Wang,et al.  Community Learning in Information Technology Fashion , 2004, ICIS.

[33]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation , 2001 .

[34]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  SOCIALIZATION TACTICS AND PERSON‐ORGANIZATION FIT , 2001 .

[35]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[36]  Joshua M. Davis.  Leveraging the IT competence of non-IS workers: social exchange and the good corporate citizen , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The assimilation of software process innovations: an organizational learning perspective , 1997 .

[38]  Michael Dinger,et al.  Absorptive Capacity and Information Systems Research: Review, Synthesis, and Directions for Future Research , 2012, MIS Q..

[39]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology and Transactive Memory Systems on Knowledge Sharing, Application, and Team Performance: A Field Study , 2010, MIS Q..

[41]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[42]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion , 1993, Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology.

[43]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[44]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[45]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[46]  Pamela E. Carter,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceputalization of the Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with IT-Enabled Work Systems , 2005 .

[47]  Qing Hu,et al.  From transactional user to VIP: how organizational and cognitive factors affect ERP assimilation at individual level , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..