Large‐scale wind deployment, social acceptance

The public is typically in agreement with the renewable energy targets established in many national states and generally supports the idea of increased reliance on wind energy. Nevertheless, many specific wind power projects face significant local opposition. A key question for the wind energy sector is, therefore, how to better engage local people to foster support for specific projects. IEA Wind Task 28 on Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Projects aims to facilitate wind energy development by reviewing current practices, emerging ideas, and exchanging successful practices among the participating countries. It also aims to disseminate the insights of leading research to a nontechnical audience, including project developers, local planning officials, and the general public. The interdisciplinary approach adopted by Task 28 enables an in-depth understanding of the nature of opposition to wind projects and a critical assessment of emerging strategies for social acceptance. Task 28 has analyzed a range of key issues related to social acceptance of wind energy, including the impacts on landscapes and ecosystems, on standard of living and well-being, the implementation of energy policy and spatial planning, the distribution of costs and benefits, and procedural justice. It is clear that although wind energy has many benefits; however, specific projects do impact local communities. As such the concerns of the affected people have to be taken seriously. Moreover, as opposition is rarely without foundation, it is in the interests of developers and advocates to engage local people and to improve projects for the benefit of all.

[1]  C. Gross,et al.  Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance , 2007 .

[2]  G. Ellis,et al.  Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-Methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals , 2007 .

[3]  Yasushi Maruyama,et al.  The rise of community wind power in Japan: Enhanced acceptance through social innovation , 2007 .

[4]  Misse Wester-Herber,et al.  Underlying Concerns in Land-Use Conflicts : The role of Place- Identity in Risk Perception , 2004 .

[5]  Jeremy Firestone,et al.  Public acceptance of offshore wind power across regions and through time , 2012 .

[6]  Mhairi Aitken,et al.  Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature , 2010 .

[7]  Gillian Irene Bristow,et al.  Wind Farms in Rural Areas: How Far Do Community Benefits from Wind Farms Represent a Local Economic Development Opportunity?. , 2011 .

[8]  Jeremy Firestone,et al.  Public acceptance of offshore wind power projects in the USA , 2009 .

[9]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security , 2009 .

[10]  Jeremy Firestone,et al.  The Effect of Wind Power Installations on Coastal Tourism , 2010 .

[11]  Bernd Möller,et al.  Emerging and fading wind energy landscapes in Denmark , 2010 .

[12]  Claire Haggett,et al.  Understanding public responses to offshore wind power , 2011 .

[13]  Jacob Ladenburg,et al.  Attitudes towards on-land and offshore wind power development in Denmark; choice of development strategy , 2008 .

[14]  Geraint Ellis,et al.  Cool Rationalities and Hot Air: A Rhetorical Approach to Understanding Debates on Renewable Energy , 2008, Global Environmental Politics.

[15]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? , 2008 .

[16]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[17]  Andreas Kontoleon,et al.  Assessing the determinants of local acceptability of wind-farm investment: A choice experiment in the Greek Aegean Islands , 2009 .