Child Characteristics by Science Instruction Interactions in Second and Third Grade and Their Relation to Students' Content-Area Knowledge, Vocabulary, and Reading Skill Gains

The associations among second- and third-grade students' content-area knowledge, vocabulary, and reading gains and the science instruction they received were examined in this exploratory longitudinal study. We also asked whether there were child characteristics × instruction interaction effects on students' content-area literacy. Second graders (n = 88) were followed into third grade (n = 73). Classrooms were observed all day in the fall, winter, and spring, and amounts and types of science instruction and language arts instruction were recorded. Results revealed that specific types of science instruction were related to second- and third-grade students' gains in content-area literacy skills and that the relation of science instruction to outcomes depended on students' fall content-area knowledge, vocabulary, and reading skills. These results suggest that science instruction may promote students' developing content-area literacy growth and may be more effective when it is implemented taking individual student differences into account.

[1]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction. Second Edition. , 2013 .

[2]  Jessica R. Toste,et al.  Effective Classroom Instruction: Implications of Child Characteristics by Reading Instruction Interactions on First Graders’ Word Reading Achievement , 2011, Journal of research on educational effectiveness.

[3]  Naomi J. Aldrich,et al.  Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning?. , 2011 .

[4]  Leonard A. Annetta,et al.  Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction , 2010 .

[5]  Paul van den Broek,et al.  Using Texts in Science Education: Cognitive Processes and Knowledge Representation , 2010 .

[6]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Literacy and Science: Each in the Service of the Other , 2010, Science.

[7]  Diana C. Rice,et al.  Content area literacy: individualizing student instruction in second-grade science , 2010 .

[8]  Jonathan M. Campbell,et al.  Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test , 2010 .

[9]  Shayne B. Piasta,et al.  The ISI Classroom Observation System: Examining the Literacy Instruction Provided to Individual Students , 2009 .

[10]  Barry Fishman,et al.  Individualizing student instruction precisely: effects of Child x Instruction interactions on first graders' literacy development. , 2009, Child development.

[11]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Sizes in Research , 2008 .

[12]  Urie Bronfenbrenner,et al.  The Bioecological Model of Human Development , 2007 .

[13]  Barry Fishman,et al.  Algorithm-Guided Individualized Reading Instruction , 2007, Science.

[14]  Carol McDonald Connor,et al.  The early years. Algorithm-guided individualized reading instruction. , 2007, Science.

[15]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[16]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Multiple Literacies, New Literacies, and Teacher Education , 2006 .

[17]  Ronald W. Marx,et al.  No Child Left Behind and Science Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Risks , 2006, The Elementary School Journal.

[18]  A. Biemiller,et al.  An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in primary grades , 2006 .

[19]  Richard M. Lerner,et al.  Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development, Vol. 1, 6th ed. , 2006 .

[20]  N. Augustine.  Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future , 2006 .

[21]  Joanna P. Williams,et al.  Expository Text Comprehension in the Primary Grade Classroom. , 2005 .

[22]  S. Suter.  Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children , 2005, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[23]  Frederick J. Morrison,et al.  EFFECTIVE READING COMPREHENSION INSTRUCTION: EXAMINING CHILD X INSTRUCTION INTERACTIONS , 2004 .

[24]  C. Schatschneider,et al.  A Multivariate Study of Individual Differences in Performance on the Reading Portion of the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test: A Brief Report. , 2004 .

[25]  Kathleen C. Perencevich,et al.  Increasing Reading Comprehension and Engagement Through Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction , 2004 .

[26]  George Farkas,et al.  The Black-White Test Score Gap , 2004 .

[27]  J. Belsky,et al.  Multiple pathways to early academic achievement , 2003 .

[28]  L. Yore,et al.  Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research , 2003 .

[29]  Catherine Snow,et al.  Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension , 2002 .

[30]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction. Solving Problems in the Teaching of Literacy. , 2002 .

[31]  C. Secker,et al.  Effects of Inquiry-Based Teacher Practices on Science Excellence and Equity , 2002 .

[32]  Nancy R. Romance,et al.  Implementing an in-depth expanded science model in elementary schools: Multi-year findings, research issues, and policy implications , 2001 .

[33]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Investigating the Engagement and Learning of Students With Learning Disabilities in Guided Inquiry Science Teaching. , 2000, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[34]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Individual Differences in Response to Early Interventions in Reading: The Lingering Problem of Treatment Resisters , 2000 .

[35]  D. Langenberg.  Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction , 2000 .

[36]  Connie Juel,et al.  Learning To Read Words: Linguistic Units and Strategies. , 1999 .

[37]  Rebecca J. Panagos.  Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children , 1998 .

[38]  M. Pressley,et al.  The effect of a literature-based program integrated into literacy and science instruction with children from diverse backgrounds , 1997 .

[39]  Js Chall,et al.  Stages of reading development (2nd ed. , 1996 .

[40]  Frederick J. Morrison,et al.  Education and Cognitive Development: A Natural Experiment , 1995 .

[41]  C. Dixon,et al.  Classroom discourse and opportunities to learn: An ethnographic study of knowledge construction in a bilingual third‐grade classroom , 1995 .

[42]  Joseph Fitzpatrick,et al.  Reading as Understanding , 1994 .

[43]  R. Wolf.  The National Assessment of Educational Progress: The Nation's Report Card , 1993 .

[44]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[45]  F. Markwardt.  Peabody Individual Achievement Test-Revised , 1989 .

[46]  J. Chall.  Stages of reading development , 1983 .

[47]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions , 1977 .

[48]  M. A. Merrill,et al.  Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale , 1972 .

[49]  Mabel A. b. Bessey,et al.  Reading for understanding , 1936 .