The wobbly table: Increased social presence via subtle incidental movement of a real-virtual table

While performing everyday interactions, we often incidentally touch and move objects in subtle ways. These objects are not necessarily directly related to the task at hand, and the movement of an object might even be entirely unintentional. If another person is touching the object at the same time, the movement can transfer through the object and be experienced - however subtly - by the other person. For example, when one person hands a drink to another, at some point both individuals will be touching the glass, and consequently exerting small (often unnoticed) forces on the other person. Despite the frequency of such subtle incidental movements of shared objects in everyday interactions, few have examined how these movements affect human-virtual human (VH) interaction. We ran an experiment to assess how presence and social presence are affected when a person experiences subtle, incidental movement through a shared real-virtual object. We constructed a real-virtual room with a table that spanned the boundary between the real and virtual environments. The participant was seated on the real side of the table, which visually extended into the virtual world via a projection screen, and the VH was seated on the virtual side of the table. The two interacted by playing a game of “Twenty Questions,” where one player asked the other a series of 20 yes/no questions to deduce what object the other player was thinking about. During the game, the “wobbly” group of subjects experienced subtle incidental movements of the real-virtual table: the entire real-virtual table tilted slightly away/toward the subject when the virtual/real human leaned on it. The control group also played the same game, except the table did not wobble. Results indicate that the wobbly group had higher presence and social presence with the virtual human in general, with statistically significant increases in presence, co-presence, and attentional allocation. We present the experiment and results, and discuss some potential implications for virtual human systems and some potential future studies.

[1]  J. Blascovich Social influence within immersive virtual environments , 2002 .

[2]  C. Spence,et al.  The science of interpersonal touch: An overview , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[3]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual interpersonal touch: Haptic interaction and copresence in collaborative virtual environments , 2008, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[4]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Humans and Persuasion: The Effects of Agency and Behavioral Realism , 2007 .

[5]  Wa Wijnand IJsselsteijn,et al.  A Virtual Midas Touch? Touch, Compliance, and Confederate Bias in Mediated Communication , 2014 .

[6]  Aduén Darriba Frederiks,et al.  Touching Virtual Agents: Embodiment and Mind , 2013, eNTERFACE.

[7]  Saniye Tugba Bulu,et al.  Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[8]  R. Belk The ineluctable mysteries of possessions. , 1991 .

[9]  Abu Saleh Md. Mahfujur Rahman,et al.  HKiss: Real world based haptic interaction with virtual 3D avatars , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[10]  Stephan Rusdorf,et al.  Real-Time Interaction with a Humanoid Avatar in an Immersive Table Tennis Simulation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[11]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Gaze and task performance in shared virtual environments , 2002, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.

[12]  R. Heslin,et al.  Hands touching hands: affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch. , 1976, Sociometry.

[13]  Cagatay Basdogan,et al.  An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments , 2000, TCHI.

[14]  Anthony Steed,et al.  High-Fidelity Avatar Eye-Representation , 2008, 2008 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[15]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Effect of robot's active touch on people's motivation , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[16]  Mel Slater,et al.  The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment , 2003, CHI '03.

[17]  Florian Mueller,et al.  Airhockey over a distance: a networked physical game to support social interactions , 2006, ACE '06.

[18]  Shuichi Nishio,et al.  Body Ownership Transfer to Teleoperated Android Robot , 2012, ICSR.

[19]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[20]  E. Goffman Behavior in public places : notes on the social organization of gatherings , 1964 .

[21]  Christine Williams,et al.  Effects of Touch on Gratuities Received in Same‐Gender and Cross‐Gender Dyads1 , 2003 .

[22]  F. Biocca,et al.  Internal Consistency and Reliability of the Networked MindsMeasure of Social Presence , 2004 .

[23]  E. Hirschman Consumers and Their Animal Companions , 1994 .

[24]  K. Hiraki,et al.  Rubber Hand Illusion under Delayed Visual Feedback , 2009, PloS one.

[25]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Empathic Touch by Relational Agents , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[26]  Lowell Gaertner,et al.  My head says yes but my heart says no: cognitive and affective attraction as a function of similarity to the ideal self. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Akio Yamamoto,et al.  Neurological and Robot-Controlled Induction of an Apparition , 2014, Current Biology.

[28]  C. Wetzel,et al.  The Midas Touch , 1984 .

[29]  Gianluca De Leo,et al.  Measuring Sense of Presence and User Characteristics to Predict Effective Training in an Online Simulated Virtual Environment , 2014, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[30]  F. H. Wilhelm,et al.  Ambulatory assessment of clinical anxiety , 1996 .

[31]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Inducing Illusory Ownership of a Virtual Body , 2009, Front. Neurosci..

[32]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Effect of the Agency and Anthropomorphism on Users' Sense of Telepresence, Copresence, and Social Presence in Virtual Environments , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[33]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[34]  Abu Saleh Md. Mahfujur Rahman,et al.  Measurements of Multimodal Approach to Haptic Interaction in Second Life Interpersonal Communication System , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[35]  Louis-Philippe Morency,et al.  Predicting Listener Backchannels: A Probabilistic Multimodal Approach , 2008, IVA.

[36]  R. Belk Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[37]  Benjamin Lok,et al.  Mixed-Reality Humans for Team Training , 2014, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[38]  Nicolas Guéguen,et al.  Tactile Contact and Evaluation of the Toucher , 2007, The Journal of social psychology.

[39]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[40]  Eva-Lotta Sallnäs,et al.  Haptic Feedback Increases Perceived Social Presence , 2010, EuroHaptics.

[41]  Adeline Deladisma,et al.  Mixed Reality Humans: Evaluating Behavior, Usability, and Acceptability , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.