Somatic-cell mutation induced by UVA and monochromatic UV radiation in repair-proficient and -deficient Drosophila melanogaster¶

Abstract Near-ultraviolet light (UVA: 320–400 nm) constitutes a major part of sunlight UV. It is important to know the effect of UVA on the biological activities of organisms on the earth. We have previously reported that black light induces somatic-cell mutation in Drosophila larvae. To investigate which wavelength of the UVA is responsible for the mutation we have now carried out a series of monochromatic irradiations (310, 320, 330, 340, 360, 380 and 400 nm) on Drosophila larvae, using the large spectrograph of the National Institute for Basic Biology (Okazaki National Research Institutes, Okazaki, Japan). Mutagenic activity was examined by the Drosophila wing-spot test in which we observe mutant wing hair colonies (spots) on the wings of adult flies obtained from the treated larvae. The induction of mutation was highest by irradiation at 310 nm and decreased as the wavelength became longer. Neither the 380 nor the 400 nm light was mutagenic. Excision repair is known to protect cells from UV damage. In the excision-repair–deficient Drosophila, the mutagenic response induced by 310 nm irradiation was 24-fold higher than that of the wild-type (7.2 ± 1.5 spots/wing/kJ vs 0.3 ± 0.08 spots/wing/kJ), and at 320 nm the difference of the response was 14-fold (0.21 vs 0.015 ± 0.005). In the case of irradiation at 330 and 340 nm the difference of the response was only two-fold (at 330 nm, 6.9 ± 2.9 × 10−3 vs 3.1 ± 1.1 × 10−3 spots/wing/kJ; at 340 nm, 3.5 ± 0.9 × 10−3 vs 2.0 ± 0.7 × 10−3). These results suggest that the lesion caused in the larvae by 320 nm irradiation may be similar to the damage induced by 310 nm and that the lights of 330 and 340 nm may induce damage different from the lesions induced by shorter-wavelength lights.

[1]  J. Sekelsky,et al.  Nucleotide excision repair endonuclease genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Mutation research.

[2]  Masakatsu Watanabe,et al.  Somatic cell mutation and photoproduct formation in Drosophila induced by monochromatic UV light in sunlight , 2000 .

[3]  D. Lugg,et al.  The measurement of solar ultraviolet radiation. , 1998, Mutation research.

[4]  A. Laat,et al.  Carcinogenesis induced by UVA (365-nm) radiation: the dose-time dependence of tumor formation in hairless mice , 1997 .

[5]  A. Sarasin,et al.  Deleterious effects of ultraviolet A radiation in human cells. , 1997, Mutation research.

[6]  D. Alexander,et al.  Characterization of mutations induced by 300 and 320 nm UV radiation in a rat fibroblast cell line. , 1996, Mutation research.

[7]  Keiji Suzuki,et al.  Experimental Correspondence between Spore Dosimetry and Spectral Photometry of Solar Ultraviolet Radiation , 1996, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[8]  N. Gorelick,et al.  UVA-induced mutational spectra in the laci gene from transgenic mouse skin , 1995 .

[9]  F. D. de Gruijl,et al.  Interaction between ultraviolet A and ultraviolet B radiations in skin cancer induction in hairless mice. , 1993, Cancer research.

[10]  R. Setlow,et al.  Wavelengths effective in induction of malignant melanoma. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  H Slaper,et al.  Wavelength dependence of skin cancer induction by ultraviolet irradiation of albino hairless mice. , 1993, Cancer research.

[12]  G. Kelfkens,et al.  The influence of ventral UVA exposure on subsequent tumorigenesis in mice by UVA or UVB irradiation. , 1992, Carcinogenesis.

[13]  H. Hayatsu,et al.  The genotoxicity of UVA irradiation in Drosophila melanogaster and the synergistic action of 8-methoxypsoralen and UVA. , 1992, Carcinogenesis.

[14]  H. Hayatsu,et al.  The genotoxicities of N-nitrosamines in Drosophila melanogaster in vivo: the correlation of mutagenicity in the wing spot test with the DNA damages detected by the DNA-repair test. , 1991, Mutation research.

[15]  F. Würgler,et al.  Statistical methods to decide whether mutagenicity test data from Drosophila assays indicate a positive, negative, or inconclusive result. , 1988, Mutation research.

[16]  R. Tyrrell,et al.  Action spectra for human skin cells: estimates of the relative cytotoxicity of the middle ultraviolet, near ultraviolet, and violet regions of sunlight on epidermal keratinocytes. , 1987, Cancer research.

[17]  S. Kondo,et al.  Photoreactivation rescue and hypermutability of ultraviolet-irradiated excisionless Drosophila melanogaster larvae. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  H Slaper,et al.  TRANSMISSION OF HUMAN EPIDERMIS AND STRATUM CORNEUM AS A FUNCTION OF THICKNESS IN THE ULTRAVIOLET AND VISIBLE WAVELENGTHS , 1984, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[19]  J. Hearst,et al.  EFFICIENT FORMATION OF A CROSSLINKABLE HMT MONOADDUCT AT THE Kpn I RECOGNITION SITE , 1984, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[20]  K. Kraemer,et al.  DNA repair protects against cutaneous and internal neoplasia: evidence from xeroderma pigmentosum. , 1984, Carcinogenesis.

[21]  F E Würgler,et al.  Somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1984, Environmental mutagenesis.

[22]  Masakatsu Watanabe,et al.  DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE OF THE OKAZAKI LARGE SPECTROGRAPH FOR PHOTOBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH , 1982 .

[23]  R. Snyder,et al.  Identification of a second locus in Drosophila melanogaster required for excision repair. , 1982, Genetics.

[24]  H. Ananthaswamy,et al.  Photocarcinogenesis: an overview. , 1997, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[25]  M A Kastenbaum,et al.  Tables for determining the statistical significance of mutation frequencies. , 1970, Mutation research.