Systematic comparison of study quality criteria.

[1]  U. Tillmann,et al.  A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. , 1997, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[2]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2008, BMJ.

[3]  David Moher,et al.  Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[4]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2014, International journal of surgery.

[5]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  [The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies]. , 2007, Gaceta sanitaria.

[6]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data. , 2009, Toxicology letters.

[7]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  Howard Balshem,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[14]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias). , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  P. Santaguida,et al.  Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions , 2012 .

[17]  Gerald Gartlehner,et al.  [GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence - indirectness]. , 2012, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.

[18]  Gerald Gartlehner,et al.  [GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence: publication bias]. , 2012, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.

[19]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research † , 2012, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[20]  Gerald Gartlehner,et al.  [GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence - inconsistency]. , 2012, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.

[21]  H. Schünemann,et al.  [GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence]. , 2013, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.

[22]  Peter J Boogaard,et al.  A systematic approach for evaluating and scoring human data. , 2013, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[23]  Division on Earth Review of Epa's Integrated Risk Information System (Iris) Process , 2014 .

[24]  Paula I. Johnson,et al.  The Navigation Guide—Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Environmental Health: Systematic Review of Nonhuman Evidence for PFOA Effects on Fetal Growth , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[25]  Tracey J. Woodruff,et al.  The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[26]  Tracey J. Woodruff,et al.  The Navigation Guide—Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Environmental Health: Systematic Review of Human Evidence for PFOA Effects on Fetal Growth , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[27]  Paula I. Johnson,et al.  The Navigation Guide—Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Environmental Health: Integration of Animal and Human Evidence for PFOA Effects on Fetal Growth , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.