Cookstove options for safety and health: Comparative analysis of technological and usability attributes

Energy use in low-income households in South Africa is considerably more hazardous than in middle to high-income households. Poverty is a key underlying factor. However, poor quality domestic energy technologies, including stoves, heaters and light sources contribute to this vulnerability. The problem is compounded by behavioural and environmental factors. Since cooking is a key energy-using chore, access to efficient, safe and versatile stoves portend safety improvements. This paper reports on a comparative analysis of eleven technological and usability attributes (CO emissions, firepower, efficiency, fuel toxicity, fuel cost, stove price, controllability, durability, availability, temperature of touchable-parts, and mechanical stability) of commercially available stoves that utilise four energy sources (kerosene, methanol, ethanol gel, and LPG). The ensuing discussion serves as a guide to enable the selection of the best-fit stove-fuel combination for low-income households. The findings indicate that LPG stoves have comparatively better overall rankings for cleanliness, firepower, safety, and durability. This analysis highlights that no combustion technology is risk-proof and there remains a burden on users to exercise diligence. We recommend that South Africa adopts an affirmative policy and strategic actions that discourage the use of kerosene as a household combustion fuel, and promotes the adoption of LPG as a safer and practical alternative.

[1]  Yongliang Ma,et al.  Greenhouse Gases and other Airborne Pollutants from Household Stoves in China: a Database for Emission Factors , 2000 .

[2]  Fiona Lambe,et al.  Putting the cook before the stove: A user-centred approach to understanding household energy decision-making – A case study of Haryana State, northern India , 2012 .

[3]  M. Peck,et al.  Burns and fires from non-electric domestic appliances in low and middle income countries Part I. The scope of the problem. , 2008, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[4]  Nathan G. Johnson,et al.  Field-based safety guidelines for solid fuel household cookstoves in developing countries , 2015 .

[5]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Energy poverty reduction by fuel switching. Impact evaluation of the LPG conversion program in Indonesia , 2014 .

[6]  David Kimemia,et al.  Performance evaluation and emission characterisation of three kerosene stoves using a Heterogeneous Stove Testing Protocol (HTP) , 2012 .

[7]  Michael Gallagher,et al.  An evaluation of a biomass stove safety protocol used for testing household cookstoves, in low and middle-income countries , 2016 .

[8]  One goal, two paths : achieving universal access to modern energy in East Asia and the Pacific , 2011 .

[9]  Nordica MacCarty,et al.  Fuel use and emissions performance of fifty cooking stoves in the laboratory and related benchmarks of performance , 2010 .

[10]  Hanung Budya,et al.  Providing cleaner energy access in Indonesia through the megaproject of kerosene conversion to LPG , 2011 .

[11]  Marianne Bradford,et al.  Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems , 2003, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[12]  H. Annegarn,et al.  Domestic LPG interventions in South Africa: Challenges and lessons , 2016 .

[13]  L. Laflamme,et al.  Demographic and circumstantial accounts of burn mortality in Cape Town, South Africa, 2001-2004: An observational register based study , 2009, BMC Public Health.

[14]  R. Ahuja,et al.  A comparative analysis of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and kerosene related burns. , 2011, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[15]  David Kimemia,et al.  An urban biomass energy economy in Johannesburg, South Africa , 2011 .

[16]  Hisham Zerriffi,et al.  Three dimensional energy profile , 2011 .

[17]  Kirk R. Smith,et al.  In Praise of Petroleum? , 2002, Science.

[18]  E. Derby,et al.  Understanding Consumer Preference and Willingness to Pay for Improved Cookstoves in Bangladesh , 2015, Journal of health communication.

[19]  Yohannes G. Hailu,et al.  Measuring and monitoring energy access: Decision-support tools for policymakers in Africa , 2012 .

[20]  Kerry Krutilla,et al.  The Urban Household Energy Transition: Social and Environmental Impacts in the Developing World , 2005 .

[21]  D. Schwebel,et al.  An intervention to reduce kerosene-related burns and poisonings in low-income South African communities. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[22]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  How do People in Rural India Perceive Improved Stoves and Clean Fuel? Evidence from Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[23]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  From Linear Fuel Switching to Multiple Cooking Strategies: A Critique and Alternative to the Energy Ladder Model , 2000 .