A methodology for organizing and quantifying the results of environmental scanning exercises

Abstract This paper presents a methodology for organizing and quantifying the results of environmental scanning exercises. The first step of the methodology is to develop a simple systems model whose components capture the essence of the problem context under study. Then, a scan identifies leads that affect one or more components. The impact a lead may have on a component is rated on a numerical scale for any number of time periods of interest. Lower and upper probabilities are estimated for each impact rating for each time period. Lower and upper expected impact scores are then calculated to provide a range of potential impacts over time. An exponential function is used to aggregate the lower and upper expected impact scores upon a component to produce lower and upper expected component changes. The methodology also allows changes in components to impact other components. The methodology was implemented to explore impacts of demographic and technological change upon the future of human and ecological health in the United States.

[1]  B. Tonn,et al.  Method for Gauging Limits to Foresight in Environmental Decision Making , 2001 .

[2]  Julia Smith,et al.  Strategies for start-ups , 1998 .

[3]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[4]  Bruce Tonn Imprecise probabilities and scenarios , 2005 .

[5]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Perspectives on organization design and behavior , 1983 .

[6]  Joseph P. Martino,et al.  A review of selected recent advances in technological forecasting , 2003 .

[7]  P. Thomas,et al.  Environmental scanning— the state of the art , 1980 .

[8]  Chun Wei Choo Environmental scanning as information seeking and organizational learning , 2001, Inf. Res..

[9]  T. Rickards Sense making in organizations , 1997 .

[10]  Osmo Kuusi,et al.  Filters of weak signals hinder foresight: Monitoring weak signals efficiently in corporate decision-making , 2006 .

[11]  P. T. Terry Mechanisms for environmental scanning , 1977 .

[12]  John D. Stoffels,et al.  Strategic issues management : a comprehensive guide to environmental scanning , 1994 .

[13]  Murat Bengisu,et al.  Forecasting emerging technologies with the aid of science and technology databases , 2006 .

[14]  D. Hambrick Environmental scanning and organizational strategy , 1982 .

[15]  M. Yasai-Ardekani,et al.  Designs for environmental scanning systems: tests of a contingency theory , 1996 .

[16]  M. Atilla Öner,et al.  Megatrends as perceived in Turkey in comparison to Austria and Germany , 2007 .

[17]  Michael Lissack,et al.  Complexity: the Science, its Vocabulary, and its Relation to Organizations , 1999 .

[18]  P. Walley Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities , 1990 .