Wetting Characteristics of Insect Wing Surfaces

Biological tiny structures have been observed on many kinds of surfaces such as lotus leaves, which have an effect on the coloration of Morpho butterflies and enhance the hydrophobicity of natural surfaces. We investigated the micro-scale and nano-scale structures on the wing surfaces of insects and found that the hierarchical multiple roughness structures help in enhancing the hydrophobicity. After examining 10 orders and 24 species of flying Pterygotan insects, we found that micro-scale and nano-scale structures typically exist on both the upper and lower wing surfaces of flying insects. The tiny structures such as denticle or setae on the insect wings enhance the hydrophobicity, thereby enabling the wings to be cleaned more easily. And the hydrophobic insect wings undergo a transition from Cassie to Wenzel states at pitch/size ratio of about 20. In order to examine the wetting characteristics on a rough surface, a biomimetic surface with micro-scale pillars is fabricated on a silicon wafer, which exhibits the same behavior as the insect wing, with the Cassie-Wenzel transition occurring consistently around a pitch/width value of 20.

[1]  Neelesh A Patankar,et al.  Anisotropy in the wetting of rough surfaces. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[2]  D. M. Bushnell,et al.  DRAG REDUCTION IN NATURE , 1991 .

[3]  Ren Luquan,et al.  Super-hydrophobic characteristics of butterfly wing surface , 1900 .

[4]  Neelesh A Patankar,et al.  Mimicking the lotus effect: influence of double roughness structures and slender pillars. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[5]  Michael Nosonovsky,et al.  Multiscale roughness and stability of superhydrophobic biomimetic interfaces. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[6]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Characterization and Distribution of Water-repellent, Self-cleaning Plant Surfaces , 1997 .

[7]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Roughness optimization for biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces , 2005 .

[8]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Wettability and Contaminability of Insect Wings as a Function of Their Surface Sculptures , 1996 .

[9]  Shu Yang,et al.  From rolling ball to complete wetting: the dynamic tuning of liquids on nanostructured surfaces. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[10]  A. Parker,et al.  Water capture by a desert beetle , 2001, Nature.

[11]  R. N. Wenzel RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER , 1936 .

[12]  Luquan Ren,et al.  Effects of Methanol on Wettability of the Non-Smooth Surface on Butterfly Wing , 2008 .

[13]  J. Sambles,et al.  Photonic structures in biology , 2003, Nature.

[14]  P. Hoffmann,et al.  Water wetting transition parameters of perfluorinated substrates with periodically distributed flat-top microscale obstacles. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[15]  A. Cassie,et al.  Wettability of porous surfaces , 1944 .

[16]  Neelesh A Patankar,et al.  Transition between superhydrophobic states on rough surfaces. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[17]  Jin Zhai,et al.  Super-hydrophobic surfaces: From natural to artificial , 2002 .

[18]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Quantitative assessment to the structural basis of water repellency in natural and technical surfaces. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[19]  Xuefeng Gao,et al.  Biophysics: Water-repellent legs of water striders , 2004, Nature.