The nearly universal link between the age of past knowledge and tomorrow’s breakthroughs in science and technology: The hotspot

Papers or patents that cite past work of a particular age distribution double their chances of being a hit. Scientists and inventors can draw on an ever-expanding literature for the building blocks of tomorrow’s ideas, yet little is known about how combinations of past work are related to future discoveries. Our analysis parameterizes the age distribution of a work’s references and revealed three links between the age of prior knowledge and hit papers and patents. First, works that cite literature with a low mean age and high age variance are in a citation “hotspot”; these works double their likelihood of being in the top 5% or better of citations. Second, the hotspot is nearly universal in all branches of science and technology and is increasingly predictive of a work’s future citation impact. Third, a scientist or inventor is significantly more likely to write a paper in the hotspot when they are coauthoring than whey they are working alone. Our findings are based on all 28,426,345 scientific papers in the Web of Science, 1945–2013, and all 5,382,833 U.S. patents, 1950–2010, and reveal new antecedents of high-impact science and the link between prior literature and tomorrow’s breakthrough ideas.

[1]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[2]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  COMMITTEE ON THE SCIENCE OF TEAM SCIENCE , 2015 .

[3]  Andrey Rzhetsky,et al.  Tradition and Innovation in Scientists’ Research Strategies , 2013, ArXiv.

[4]  Susan Feng Lu,et al.  The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Finding scientific gems with Google's PageRank algorithm , 2006, J. Informetrics.

[6]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Age and Scientific Genius , 2014 .

[7]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact , 2013, Science.

[8]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Prediction of highly cited papers , 2013, ArXiv.

[9]  R. Merton Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. , 1957 .

[10]  David Lazer,et al.  The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation , 2007 .

[11]  Katy Börner,et al.  A Multi-Level Systems Perspective for the Science of Team Science , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[12]  Dmitri Kuksov,et al.  When More Alternatives Lead to Less Choice , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[13]  Qing Ke,et al.  Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science , 2015 .

[15]  Benjamin F. Jones The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .

[16]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science , 2008, Science.

[17]  W. Myers,et al.  Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact , 2013 .

[18]  Peter Pirolli,et al.  Rational Analyses of Information Foraging on the Web , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Good news for the people who love bad news: an analysis of the funding of the top 1% most highly cited ecologists , 2012 .

[20]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[21]  Emilio Matricciani,et al.  The probability distribution of the age of references in engineering papers , 1991 .

[22]  Marta Sales-Pardo,et al.  Statistical validation of a global model for the distribution of the ultimate number of citations accrued by papers published in a scientific journal , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  A. Raftery Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research , 1995 .

[25]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[26]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[27]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .

[28]  Ryan Whalen,et al.  Common Law Evolution and Judicial Impact in the Age of Information , 2017 .