Structural property of regulatory elements in human promoters.

The capacity of transcription factors to activate gene expression is encoded in the promoter sequences, which are composed of short regulatory motifs that function as transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) for specific proteins. To the best of our knowledge, the structural property of TFBSs that controls transcription is still poorly understood. Rigidity is one of the important structural properties of DNA, and plays an important role in guiding DNA-binding proteins to the target sites efficiently. After analyzing the rigidity of 2897 TFBSs in 1871 human promoters, we show that TFBSs are generally more flexible than other genomic regions such as exons, introns, 3' untranslated regions, and TFBS-poor promoter regions. Furthermore, we find that the density of TFBSs is consistent with the average rigidity profile of human promoters upstream of the transcription start site, which implies that TFBSs directly influence the promoter structure. We also examine the local rigid regions probably caused by specific TFBSs such as the DNA sequence TATA(A/T)A(A/T) box, which may inhibit nucleosomes and thereby facilitate the access of transcription factors bound nearby. Our results suggest that the structural property of TFBSs accounts for the promoter structure as well as promoter activity.

[1]  L. Luo,et al.  A statistical mechanical model for predicting B-DNA curvature and flexibility. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  Manju Bansal,et al.  Structural properties of promoters: similarities and differences between prokaryotes and eukaryotes , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  Philipp Bucher,et al.  EPD in its twentieth year: towards complete promoter coverage of selected model organisms , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  S. Morosetti,et al.  A statistical approach for analyzing structural and regulative information in prokaryotic genomes. , 2006, Biophysical chemistry.

[5]  R. Netz,et al.  Complexes of semiflexible polyelectrolytes and charged spheres as models for salt-modulated nucleosomal structures. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Christopher A. Hunter,et al.  Sequence-dependent DNA structure: tetranucleotide conformational maps. , 2000 .

[7]  E. Geiduschek,et al.  Localized DNA flexibility contributes to target site selection by DNA-bending proteins. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  B. Shklovskii,et al.  How a protein searches for its specific site on DNA: the role of intersegment transfer. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Yoshiro Fukue,et al.  A highly distinctive mechanical property found in the majority of human promoters and its transcriptional relevance , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  Leonor Saiz,et al.  Multiprotein DNA looping. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[11]  Wolfram Möbius,et al.  Kinetic accessibility of buried DNA sites in nucleosomes. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[12]  Manju Bansal,et al.  An assessment of three dinucleotide parameters to predict DNA curvature by quantitative comparison with experimental data. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  S. Halford,et al.  Measurement of the contributions of 1D and 3D pathways to the translocation of a protein along DNA. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Iraj Daizadeh,et al.  EID: the Exon?Intron Database?an exhaustive database of protein-coding intron-containing genes , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  Alexander E. Kel,et al.  TRANSFAC® and its module TRANSCompel®: transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  Unwrapping of DNA-protein complexes under external stretching. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  G. Bocchinfuso,et al.  Dual role of DNA intrinsic curvature and flexibility in determining nucleosome stability. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  D. K. Hawley,et al.  DNA bending is an important component of site-specific recognition by the TATA binding protein. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  Irene K. Moore,et al.  A genomic code for nucleosome positioning , 2006, Nature.

[20]  B. Shklovskii,et al.  How does a protein search for the specific site on DNA: The role of disorder. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Martin S. Taylor,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of mammalian promoter architecture and evolution , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[22]  T Schlick,et al.  The influence of salt on the structure and energetics of supercoiled DNA. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[23]  P. Baldi,et al.  DNA structure in human RNA polymerase II promoters. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  Yoshiro Fukue,et al.  Core promoter elements of eukaryotic genes have a highly distinctive mechanical property. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  S. Halford,et al.  Protein motion from non‐specific to specific DNA by three‐dimensional routes aided by supercoiling , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[26]  Judith Berman,et al.  The pattern and evolution of yeast promoter bendability. , 2007, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[27]  Yvan Saeys,et al.  Large-scale structural analysis of the core promoter in mammalian and plant genomes , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[28]  A Libchaber,et al.  Sequence dependent rigidity of single stranded DNA. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[29]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Nucleosome positioning signals in genomic DNA. , 2007, Genome research.

[30]  H. Diamant,et al.  Binding of molecules to DNA and other semiflexible polymers. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[31]  I. Brukner,et al.  Sequence‐dependent bending propensity of DNA as revealed by DNase I: parameters for trinucleotides. , 1995, The EMBO journal.