Awareness, use and effectiveness of models and methods for new product development

Despite the large number of new product models and methods available to improve the success rate of new products, empirical evidence proves that only a few companies actually use them. This seems rather strange because today the pressure on companies to improve their new product development is high. A bottle‐neck may be the extent to which companies are aware of these models and methods. Companies may also have abandoned their use already. To investigate this, gathers empirical data from 75 industrial companies in The Netherlands. Results show that many companies are actually aware of these models and methods. However, they often do not know them by name. The average penetration level is about 30 per cent and the models and methods are used in an unfocused and less formal manner. The level of satisfaction with the performance of most models and methods is high. Furthermore, a positive relationship between the degree of use of models/methods and company′s gross profits exists.

[1]  P. Kotler.  Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control , 1972 .

[2]  Horst Geschka,et al.  Introduction and Use of Idea-Generating Methods , 1978 .

[3]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[4]  A. J. van Weele,et al.  New Product Development in Dutch Companies: The Idea Generation Stage , 1981 .

[5]  D. Littler.  Design and Marketing of New Products , 1981 .

[6]  Horst Geschka,et al.  Creativity Techniques in Product Planning and Development : A View from West Germany : R&D Management , 1983 .

[7]  Knut Holt,et al.  Product Innovation Management: A Workbook for Management in Industry , 1983 .

[8]  A. Page,et al.  Principles vs. practice in new product planning , 1984 .

[9]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[10]  R. Cooper,et al.  0 0 0 0 An Investigation into the New Product Process : Steps , Deficiencies , and Impact , 1986 .

[11]  William L. Moore,et al.  New product development practices of industrial marketers , 1987 .

[12]  John Preston,et al.  Winning at New Products , 1988 .

[13]  Philippe Cattin,et al.  Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update , 1989 .

[14]  D. Wilemon,et al.  Accelerating the Development of Technology-Based New Products , 1990 .

[15]  R. Cooper.  New Products: What Distinguishes the Winners? , 1990 .

[16]  V. K. Narayanan,et al.  The life cycle of the PIMS and BCG models , 1991 .

[17]  C. Crawford.  The Hidden Costs of Accelerated Product Development , 1992 .

[18]  V. Mahajan,et al.  New product models: Practice, shortcomings and desired improvements , 1992 .

[19]  Alma T. Mintu.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1992 .

[20]  S. Hart,et al.  Where to Now in New Product Development Research , 1992 .

[21]  Y. Aharoni.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1992 .

[22]  A. Griffin.  Evaluating QFD's Use in US Firms as a Process for Developing Products , 1992 .

[23]  D. Wilemon,et al.  A Survey of Major Approaches for Accelerating New Product Development , 1992 .

[24]  J. Workman.  Marketing's Limited Role in New Product Development in One Computer Systems Firm , 1993 .

[25]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Managing New Product and Process Development , 1993 .

[26]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  New Products : The Factors that Drive Success , 1994 .

[27]  Thomas E. Mosley.  Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch (2nd edition): by Robert G. Cooper. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1993. 358 pages. $16.95 , 1994 .