Tactile interaction with a humanoid robot for children with autism: A case study analysis involving user requirements and results of an initial implementation

The work presented in this paper is part of our investigation in the ROBOSKIN project. The project aims to develop and demonstrate a range of new robot capabilities based on the tactile feedback provided by a robotic skin. One of the project's objectives is to improve human-robot interaction capabilities in the application domain of robot-assisted play. This paper presents design challenges in augmenting a humanoid robot with tactile sensors specifically for interaction with children with autism. It reports on a preliminary study that includes requirements analysis based on a case study evaluation of interactions of children with autism with the child-sized, minimally expressive robot KASPAR. This is followed by the implementation of initial sensory capabilities on the robot that were then used in experimental investigations of tactile interaction with children with autism.

[1]  B. Robins,et al.  Does appearance matter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot , 2006 .

[2]  W. Karwowski.  International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors , 2001 .

[3]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Detecting and Analysing Children’s Play Styles with Autonomous Mobile Robots: A Case Study Comparing Observational Data with Sensor Readings , 2003 .

[4]  Gt Swart,et al.  Sensory Perceptual Issues in Autism and Asperger Syndrome Different Sensory Experiences Different Perceptual Worlds. , 2006 .

[5]  Matthew J. Hertenstein,et al.  The Communicative Functions of Touch in Humans, Nonhuman Primates, and Rats: A Review and Synthesis of the Empirical Research , 2006, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[6]  Burak Güçlü,et al.  Tactile sensitivity of children: effects of frequency, masking, and the non-Pacinian I psychophysical channel. , 2007, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  T. Shibata,et al.  Engaging with artificial pets , 2005 .

[8]  A. Billard,et al.  Building Robota, a Mini-Humanoid Robot for the Rehabilitation of Children With Autism , 2007, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[9]  R. Jordan.  Autistic Spectrum Disorders: An Introductory Handbook for Practitioners , 1999 .

[10]  T. Kanda,et al.  An approach for a social robot to understand human relationships: Friendship estimation through interaction with robots , 2006 .

[11]  Tetsuo Ono,et al.  Body Movement Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction , 2003, IJCAI.

[12]  Masanori Fukushima,et al.  Stimulus distinction in the skin of a robot using tactile and shock sensors , 2010 .

[13]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, Second Edition - 3 Volume Set , 2006 .

[14]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Design of a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[15]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Robot therapy in a care house - its sociopsychological and physiological effects on the residents , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[16]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Title of paper : KASPAR – A Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot for Human-Robot Interaction Research , 2009 .

[17]  D. François.  Facilitating Play Between Children with Autism and an Autonomous Robot , 2009 .

[18]  A. Billard,et al.  Chapter 18 Games Children with Autism Can Play With Robota , a Humanoid Robotic Doll , 1995 .