Clinical Significance of a Large Difference (≥ 2 points) between Biopsy and Post-prostatectomy Pathological Gleason Scores in Patients with Prostate Cancer
暂无分享,去创建一个
Wun-Jae Kim | Y. Choi | S. Byun | T. Kwon | S. Seo | H. Lee | H. Choi | K. Lee | Sang Eun Lee | H. Ahn | J. Cheon | B. Chung | T. Hwang | H. J. Kim | Cheryn Song | M. Chung | C. Oh | J. Cho | Eun Sik Lee | T. Jung | C. Yoo
[1] Kyu-Won Jung,et al. Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality and Survival in 2006-2007 , 2009, Journal of Korean medical science.
[2] U. Capitanio,et al. Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. , 2009, Urology.
[3] E. Klein,et al. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer , 2009, BJU international.
[4] M. Terris,et al. The association between prostate size and Gleason score upgrading depends on the number of biopsy cores obtained: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital Database , 2008, BJU International.
[5] J. Staffurth,et al. Should the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer be modified to account for high-grade tertiary components? A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.
[6] Deborah Schrag,et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[7] L. Egevad,et al. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[8] T. Tsuzuki,et al. The Prognostic Significance of Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens , 2004, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[9] L. Kiemeney,et al. Does the tertiary Gleason pattern influence the PSA progression-free interval after retropubic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer? , 2004, European urology.
[10] H. Frierson,et al. Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 years , 2002, Cancer.
[11] T. Esen,et al. Discrepancy between Gleason Scores of Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens , 2000, European Urology.
[12] D J Ruiter,et al. HISTOLOGICAL GRADE HETEROGENEITY IN MULTIFOCAL PROSTATE CANCER. BIOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS , 1996, The Journal of pathology.
[13] D. Bostwick,et al. Analysis of risk factors for progression in patients with pathologically confined prostate cancers after radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 1996, The Journal of urology.
[14] A. Partin,et al. Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy. A multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up. , 1996, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[15] W. Catalona,et al. Grading errors in prostatic needle biopsies: relation to the accuracy of tumor grade in predicting pelvic lymph node metastases. , 1982, The Journal of urology.
[16] J. Epstein,et al. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist. , 2001, Human pathology.
[17] J. Srigley,et al. Interobserver variation in prostate cancer Gleason scoring: are there implications for the design of clinical trials and treatment strategies? , 1997, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).
[18] T. Wheeler,et al. Heterogeneity of prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 1994, Urology.
[19] R. Ackermann,et al. The value of perineal punch biopsy in estimating the histological grade of carcinoma of the prostate , 1980, The Prostate.