The Robot Who Tried Too Hard: Social Behaviour of a Robot Tutor Can Negatively Affect Child Learning

Social robots are finding increasing application in the domain of education, particularly for children, to support and augment learning opportunities. With an implicit assumption that social and adaptive behaviour is desirable, it is therefore of interest to determine precisely how these aspects of behaviour may be exploited in robots to support children in their learning. In this paper, we explore this issue by evaluating the effect of a social robot tutoring strategy with children learning about prime numbers. It is shown that the tutoring strategy itself leads to improvement, but that the presence of a robot employing this strategy amplifies this effect, resulting in significant learning. However, it was also found that children interacting with a robot using social and adaptive behaviours in addition to the teaching strategy did not learn a significant amount. These results indicate that while the presence of a physical robot leads to improved learning, caution is required when applying social behaviour to a robot in a tutoring context. Categories and Subject Descriptors H.1.2 [Models and Principles]: User/Machine Systems

[1]  B. Bloom The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[2]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Comparing Robot Embodiments in a Guided Discovery Learning Interaction with Children , 2015, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[3]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[4]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  A touchscreen-based ‘Sandtray’ to facilitate, mediate and contextualise human-robot social interaction , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[5]  Susan Bell Trickett,et al.  Social Engagement in Public Places: A Tale of One Robot , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  K. VanLehn The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems , 2011 .

[7]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Personalizing Robot Tutors to Individuals’ Learning Differences , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[8]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[9]  Sungho Kim,et al.  The educational use of home robots for children , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[10]  KandaTakayuki,et al.  Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children , 2004 .

[11]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Children Comply with a Robot’s Indirect Requests , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[12]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Pay attention!: designing adaptive agents that monitor and improve user engagement , 2012, CHI.

[13]  Joris B. Janssen,et al.  Using a robot to personalise health education for children with diabetes type 1: a pilot study. , 2013, Patient education and counseling.

[14]  R. Mayer,et al.  Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice ☆ , 2005 .

[15]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor , 2010, CHI.

[16]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Effects of Embodiment and Gestures on Social Interaction in Drumming Games with a Humanoid Robot , 2009, Adv. Robotics.

[17]  Shaobo Huang,et al.  How to train your DragonBot: Socially assistive robots for teaching children about nutrition through play , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[18]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Constraining Content in Mediated Unstructured Social Interactions: Studies in the Wild , 2013, 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction.

[19]  Fabio Tesser,et al.  Multimodal child-robot interaction: building social bonds , 2013, HRI 2013.

[20]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[21]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  A Personalization Effect in Multimedia Learning: Students Learn Better When Words Are in Conversational Style Rather Than Formal Style. , 2004 .

[22]  Charles R. Crowell,et al.  Robot social presence and gender: Do females view robots differently than males? , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[23]  Melissa E. O'Neill The Genuine Sieve of Eratosthenes , 2009, Journal of Functional Programming.

[24]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[25]  J. Sweller COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[26]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  The Physical Presence of a Robot Tutor Increases Cognitive Learning Gains , 2012, CogSci.

[27]  K. VanLehn,et al.  Why Do Only Some Events Cause Learning During Human Tutoring? , 2003 .