Response of wetland plant species to hydrologic conditions

Understanding hydrologic requirements of native and introduced species is critical to sustaining native plant communities in wetlands of disturbed landscapes. We examined plant assemblages, and 31 of the most common species comprising them, from emergent wetlands in an urbanizing area of the Pacific Northwest, USA, in relation to in situ, fine-scale hydrology. Percent cover by plant species was estimated in 2208 1-m2 plots across 43 sites, with water depth at time of vegetation sampling measured in 432 plots. Three years of bi-weekly hydrologic data from each of the 43 sites were used to estimate mean surface water level and mean absolute difference (MAD) in surface water level for every plot. Nine assemblages of plant species that co-occur in the field were identified using TWINSPAN. The assemblage richest in native species occurred under intermediate hydrologic conditions and was bracketed by pasture grass dominated assemblages at drier conditions with low water level variability, and Phalaris arundinacea L. assemblages with higher mean water levels and variability. Results suggest minor changes in average water levels (∼10 cm) or in variability (±2 cm in MAD) could promote a shift from assemblages dominated by natives to those dominated by invasive or alien taxa. Canonical correspondence analysis segregated the species into four groups related to hydrologic gradients. Each species response group was typified by taxa with similar optima for a given environmental variable, with each group related to a characteristic suite of hydrologic conditions. The most common species (P. arundinacea, Juncus effusus L., and Typha latifolia L.), each representing a different response group, exhibited unique responses in occurrence/abundance in relation to water level variability, but were abundant over a wide range of water depth. The realized niches of other species in each response group were more restricted, with peaks in cover confined to narrower ranges of water depth and variability.

[1]  P. Wetzel,et al.  Effects of nutrient and soil moisture on competition between Carex stricta, Phalaris arundinacea ,a ndTypha latifolia , 1998 .

[2]  R. Wetzel,et al.  Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of Juncus effusus in a temperate wetland ecosystem , 1999 .

[3]  Joy B. Zedler,et al.  Coastal Mitigation in Southern California: The Need for a Regional Restoration Strategy , 1996 .

[4]  O. F. R. van Tongeren,et al.  Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology: Cluster analysis , 1995 .

[5]  T. Dahl,et al.  Wetlands, status and trends in the conterminous United States, mid-1970's to mid-1980's , 1991 .

[6]  P. Keddy,et al.  The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities , 1995 .

[7]  A. G. Valk,et al.  Restoring Prairie Wetlands: An Ecological Approach , 1994 .

[8]  M. F. Merigliano,et al.  The native status of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in the inland northwest, USA. , 1998 .

[9]  C. Braak,et al.  The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis , 1987, Vegetatio.

[10]  R. H. Økland On the variation explained by ordination and constrained ordination axes , 1999 .

[11]  T. Schueler The importance of imperviousness , 1995 .

[12]  R. Tiner,et al.  Wetlands of the United States : current status and recent trends / by Ralph W. Tiner, Jr. ... [et al.]. , 1984 .

[13]  F.B.J. Menting,et al.  Control of plant species richness and zonation of functional groups along a freshwater flooding gradient , 1999 .

[14]  J. Levine Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. , 2000, Science.

[15]  James S. Kagan,et al.  Native wetland, riparian, and upland plant communities and their biota in the Willamette Valley, Oregon , 2006 .

[16]  D. White,et al.  Oregon, USA, ecological regions and subregions for water quality management , 1991 .

[17]  Joan G. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Chamaecyparis thyoides wetlands and suburbanization : effects on hydrology, water quality and plant community composition , 1991 .

[18]  J. Molofsky,et al.  Environmental and genetic effects on the early survival and growth of the invasive grass Phalaris arundinacea , 1999 .

[19]  C. Braak Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .

[20]  M. Palmer PUTTING THINGS IN EVEN BETTER ORDER: THE ADVANTAGES OF CANONICAL CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS' , 1993 .

[21]  M. O. Hill,et al.  A Fortran program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes , 1979 .

[22]  J. Ehrenfeld Evaluating wetlands within an urban context , 2000, Urban Ecosystems.

[23]  M. Hill,et al.  Data analysis in community and landscape ecology , 1987 .

[24]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  Endangered Ecosystems of the United States: A Preliminary Assessment of Loss and Degradation , 1996, Restoration & Management Notes.

[25]  P. Ladiges,et al.  Plant species-richness and invasion by exotics in relation to disturbance of wetland communities on the Riverine Plain, NSW , 1988 .

[26]  C. Braak,et al.  Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology , 1995, Aquatic Sciences.

[27]  C. L. Johannessen,et al.  THE VEGETATION OF THE WILLAMETTE VALLEY , 1971 .

[28]  J. Silvertown,et al.  Hydrologically defined niches reveal a basis for species richness in plant communities , 1999, Nature.

[29]  Arthur Cronquist,et al.  Flora of the Pacific Northwest , 1974 .

[30]  J. Ehrenfeld The effects of changes in land-use on swamps of the New Jersey Pine Barrens , 1983 .

[31]  Karen K. Finley Hydrology and related soil features of three Willamette Valley wetland prairies , 1994 .

[32]  James H. Brown,et al.  The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management , 1996 .

[33]  Hydrology and history: land use changes and ecological responses in an urban wetland , 1998, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[34]  Derek B. Booth,et al.  Urbanization and the Natural Drainage System -- Impacts, Solutions, and Prognoses , 1991 .

[35]  L. Bragazza,et al.  Ecological gradients in some Sphagnum mires in the south‐eastern Alps (Italy) , 1999 .

[36]  The challenge of protecting endangered species habitat along the Southern California coast , 1991 .

[37]  H. Brix,et al.  Oxygen stress in wetland plants: Comparison of de-oxygenated and reducing root environments , 1996 .

[38]  P. Sopp Cluster analysis. , 1996, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[39]  N. Bratchell,et al.  Chapter 6 Cluster Analysis , 1992 .

[40]  T. A. Hanley,et al.  PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS IN RIPARIAN WETLANDS—A TEST OF BIODIVERSITY THEORY , 1998 .

[41]  James B. Grace,et al.  Long-term dynamics of Typha populations , 1998 .

[42]  G. Krapu,et al.  Prairie Basin Wetlands of the Dakotas: A Community Profile, , 1989 .

[43]  R. Sibson,et al.  A brief description of natural neighbor interpolation , 1981 .

[44]  C. Jackson,et al.  URBANIZATION OF AQUATIC SYSTEMS: DEGRADATION THRESHOLDS, STORMWATER DETECTION, AND THE LIMITS OF MITIGATION 1 , 1997 .

[45]  James T. Carlton,et al.  Biological Invasions and Cryptogenic Species , 1996 .

[46]  Céline Boutin,et al.  A functional classification of wetland plants , 1993 .

[47]  R. Brooks,et al.  Plants as indicators of wetland water source , 1997, Plant Ecology.

[48]  Barbara L. Bedford,et al.  The Need to Define Hydrologic Equivalence at the Landscape Scale for Freshwater Wetland Mitigation , 1996 .

[49]  P. Keddy,et al.  Competitive Performance and Species Distribution in Shortline Plant Communities: A Comparative Approach , 1995 .

[50]  M. O. Hill,et al.  TWINSPAN: a FORTRAN program of arranging multivariate data in an ordered two way table by classification of individual and attributes , 1979 .

[51]  James B. Grace,et al.  Habitat Partitioning and Competitive Displacement in Cattails (Typha): Experimental Field Studies , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[52]  T. Dahl,et al.  Wetlands Losses in the United States 1780's to 1980's , 1990 .