A Disturbance Rejection Measure for Limit Cycle Walkers: The Gait Sensitivity Norm

The construction of more capable bipedal robots highly depends on the ability to measure their performance. This performance is often measured in terms of speed or energy efficiency, but these properties are secondary to the robot's ability to prevent falling given the inevitable presence of disturbances, i.e., its disturbance rejection. Existing disturbance rejection measures (zero moment point, basin of attraction, Floquet multipliers) are unsatisfactory due to conservative assumptions, long computation times, or bad correlation to actual disturbance rejection. This paper introduces a new measure called the Gait Sensitivity Norm that combines a short calculation time with good correlation to actual disturbance rejection. It is especially suitable for implementation on limit cycle walkers, a class of bipeds that currently excels in terms of energy efficiency, but still has limited disturbance rejection capabilities. The paper contains an explanation of the Gait Sensitivity Norm and a validation of its value on a simple walking model as well as on a real bipedal robot. The disturbance rejection of the simple model is studied for variations of floor slope, foot radius, and hip spring stiffness. We show that the calculation speed is as fast as the standard Floquet multiplier analysis, while the actual disturbance rejection is correctly predicted with 93% correlation on average.

[1]  H. Hermes,et al.  Foundations of optimal control theory , 1968 .

[2]  M Vukobratović,et al.  On the stability of biped locomotion. , 1970, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[3]  R. Guimarães,et al.  Characteristics of the gait in old people who fall. , 1980, International rehabilitation medicine.

[4]  I. Shimoyama,et al.  Dynamic Walk of a Biped , 1984 .

[5]  Yildirim Hurmuzlu,et al.  The role of impact in the stability of bipedal locomotion , 1986 .

[6]  Tad McGeer,et al.  Passive Dynamic Walking , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[7]  Shuuji Kajita,et al.  Study of dynamic biped locomotion on rugged terrain-derivation and application of the linear inverted pendulum mode , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  S. Kajita,et al.  Experimental study of biped dynamic walking , 1996 .

[9]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Gait Changes in Older Adults: Predictors of Falls or Indicators of Fear? , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[10]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Increased gait unsteadiness in community-dwelling elderly fallers. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  M. Coleman,et al.  The simplest walking model: stability, complexity, and scaling. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  Bernard Espiau,et al.  A Study of the Passive Gait of a Compass-Like Biped Robot , 1998, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[13]  Ambarish Goswami,et al.  Foot rotation indicator (FRI) point: a new gait planning tool to evaluate postural stability of biped robots , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[14]  R. van der Linde Passive bipedal walking with phasic muscle contraction , 1999, Biological cybernetics.

[15]  Chee-Meng Chew,et al.  Virtual Model Control: An Intuitive Approach for Bipedal Locomotion , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  B. Kendall Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 2001 .

[17]  Martijn Wisse,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Passive-Dynamic Walking Robot with Two Legs and Knees , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[18]  Toru Shimada,et al.  Self-Excited Walking of a Biped Mechanism , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[19]  Arend L. Schwab,et al.  Basin of Attraction of the Simplest Walking Model , 2001 .

[20]  Pierre-Brice Wieber On the stability of walking systems , 2002 .

[21]  Arthur D Kuo,et al.  Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  Pablo González de Santos,et al.  A New Dynamic Energy Stability Margin for Walking Machines , 2003 .

[23]  Christine Chevallereau,et al.  RABBIT: a testbed for advanced control theory , 2003 .

[24]  Miomir Vukobratovic,et al.  Zero-Moment Point - Thirty Five Years of its Life , 2004, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[25]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff Gait variability: methods, modeling and meaning , 2005, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[26]  Minoru Asada,et al.  Walking stabilization of biped with pneumatic actuators against terrain changes , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[27]  Russ Tedrake,et al.  Efficient Bipedal Robots Based on Passive-Dynamic Walkers , 2005, Science.

[28]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  How to keep from falling forward: elementary swing leg action for passive dynamic walkers , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[29]  Jerry Pratt,et al.  Velocity-Based Stability Margins for Fast Bipedal Walking , 2006 .

[30]  Martijn Wisse,et al.  Design and Construction of MIKE; a 2-D Autonomous Biped Based on Passive Dynamic Walking , 2006 .