Performance of EU-TIRADS in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules. A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE Several thyroid imaging reporting and data systems (TIRADS) have been proposed to stratify the malignancy risk of thyroid nodule by ultrasound. The TIRADS by the European Thyroid Association, namely EU-TIRADS, was the last one to be published. DESIGN We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of malignancy in each EU-TIRADS class and the performance of EU-TIRADS class 5 versus 2, 3 and 4 in detecting malignant lesions. METHODS Four databases were searched until December 2019. Original articles reporting the performance of EU-TIRADS and adopting histology as reference standard were included. The number of malignant nodules in each class and the number of nodules classified as true/false positive/negative were extracted. A random-effects model was used for pooling data. RESULTS Seven studies were included, evaluating 5,672 thyroid nodules. The prevalence of malignancy in each EU-TIRADS class was 0.5% (95%CI 0.0-1.3), 5.9% (95%CI 2.6-9.2), 21.4% (95%CI 11.1-31.7), and 76.1% (95%CI 63.7-88.5). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR+, LR- and DOR of EU-TIRADS class 5 were 83.5% (95%CI 74.5-89.8), 84.3% (95%CI 66.2-93.7), 76.1% (95%CI 63.7-88.5), 85.4% (95%CI 79.1-91.8), 4.9 (95%CI 2.9-8.2), 0.2 (95%CI 0.1-0.3), and 24.5 (95%CI 11.7-51.0), respectively. A further improved performance was found after excluding two studies because of limited sample size and low prevalence of malignancy in class 5. CONCLUSIONS A limited number of studies generally conducted using a retrospective design was found. Acknowledging this limitation, the performance of EU-TIRADS in stratifying the risk of thyroid nodules was high. Also, EU-TIRADS class 5 showed moderate evidence of detecting malignant lesions.

[1]  P. Trimboli,et al.  Performance of five ultrasound risk stratification systems in selecting thyroid nodules for FNA. A meta-analysis. , 2020, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[2]  S. Filetti,et al.  Low‐risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: Optimal management toward a more conservative approach , 2020, Journal of surgical oncology.

[3]  P. Trimboli,et al.  Ultrasound risk stratification systems for thyroid nodule: between lights and shadows, we are moving towards a new era , 2020, Endocrine.

[4]  P. Trimboli,et al.  Risk of malignancy in the various categories of the UK Royal College of Pathologists Thy terminology for thyroid FNA cytology: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2019, Cancer cytopathology.

[5]  K. Dobruch-Sobczak,et al.  Histopathological Verification of the Diagnostic Performance of the EU-TIRADS Classification of Thyroid Nodules—Results of a Multicenter Study Performed in a Previously Iodine-Deficient Region , 2019, Journal of clinical medicine.

[6]  P. Trimboli,et al.  Italian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology: the risk of malignancy between indeterminate lesions at low or high risk. A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Endocrine.

[7]  Giorgio Grani,et al.  Reducing the Number of Unnecessary Thyroid Biopsies While Improving Diagnostic Accuracy: Toward the “Right” TIRADS , 2018, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[8]  William D Middleton,et al.  Interobserver Variability of Sonographic Features Used in the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System. , 2018, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  P. Trimboli,et al.  American Thyroid Association ultrasound system for the initial assessment of thyroid nodules: Use in stratifying the risk of malignancy of indeterminate lesions , 2018, Head & neck.

[10]  William D Middleton,et al.  ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[11]  David Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement , 2018, JAMA.

[12]  M. Maranghi,et al.  Interobserver agreement of various thyroid imaging reporting and data systems , 2017, Endocrine connections.

[13]  P. Trimboli,et al.  Detection rate of FNA cytology in medullary thyroid carcinoma: a meta‐analysis , 2015, Clinical endocrinology.

[14]  Michael R Gionfriddo,et al.  The accuracy of thyroid nodule ultrasound to predict thyroid cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[15]  L. Mazzucchelli,et al.  The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: A Meta-Analysis , 2012, Acta Cytologica.

[16]  Susan Mallett,et al.  QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  Min Jung Kim,et al.  Cytological Results of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology for Thyroid Nodules: Emphasis on Correlation with Sonographic Findings , 2011, Yonsei medical journal.

[18]  L. Hegedüs,et al.  The Thyroid Nodule , 2004 .