The Migration of Technical Workers

Using panel data on the Danish population, we estimated the revealed preferences of scientists and engineers for the places in which they choose to work. Our results indicate that these technical workers exhibit substantial sensitivity to differences in wages but that they have even stronger preferences for living close to family and friends. The magnitude of these preferences, moreover, suggests that the greater geographic mobility of scientists and engineers, relative to the population as a whole, stems from more pronounced variation across regions in the wages that they can expect. These results remain robust to estimation on a sample of individuals who must select new places of work for reasons unrelated to their preferences--those who had been employed at establishments that discontinued operations. (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

[1]  Yong Chen,et al.  Local amenities and life-cycle migration: Do people move for jobs or fun? , 2008 .

[2]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The Origin and Growth of Industry Clusters: The Making of Silicon Valley and Detroit , 2010 .

[3]  Octávio Figueiredo,et al.  Home-field advantage: location decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs , 2002 .

[4]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  The Social Attachment to Place , 2010 .

[5]  Oded Galor,et al.  The Distribution of Human Capital and Economic Growth , 1997 .

[6]  S. Menard.  Six Approaches to Calculating Standardized Logistic Regression Coefficients , 2004 .

[7]  John Kennan,et al.  The Effect of Expected Income on Individual Migration Decisions , 2003 .

[8]  Koichi Hamada,et al.  The brain drain, international integration of markets for professionals and unemployment; a theoretical analysis , 1974 .

[9]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[10]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  Power Couples: Changes in the Locational Choice of the College Educated, 1940-1990 , 1999 .

[11]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  The Social Structure of Entrepreneurial Activity: Geographic Concentration of Footwear Production in the United States, 1940–19891 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Corporate Demography and Income Inequality , 2007 .

[13]  P. Combes,et al.  Spatial Wage Disparities: Sorting Matters! , 2004 .

[14]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  The embedded entrepreneur , 2009 .

[15]  Christian Bayer,et al.  A generalized options approach to aggregate migration with an application to US federal states , 2006 .

[16]  P. Romer.  Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Exceptional contributions to US science by the foreign-born and foreign-educated , 2001 .

[18]  L. Sjaastad.  The Costs and Returns of Human Migration , 1962 .

[19]  Paul A. Coomes,et al.  The Location Choice of Employment-Based Immigrants Among U.S. Metro Areas , 2005 .

[20]  D. Pyke,et al.  Hitler's Gift: The True Story of the Scientists Expelled by the Nazi Regime , 2000 .

[21]  Georges Lemaître,et al.  Counting Immigrants and Expatriates in OECD Countries: A New Perspective , 2005 .

[22]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing for IIA in the Multinomial Logit Model , 2007 .

[23]  S. Rosenthal,et al.  The attenuation of human capital spillovers , 2008 .

[24]  Darren M. Scott,et al.  THE LOCATION CHOICE OF EMPLOYMENT-BASED IMMIGRANTS , 2004 .

[25]  J. Kennan,et al.  The Effect of Expected Income on Individual Migration Decisions , 2003 .

[26]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Are the Foreign Born a Source of Strength for U.S. Science? , 1999, Science.

[27]  N. Edward Coulson,et al.  Housing tenure and labor market impacts: The search goes on , 2008 .

[28]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[29]  M. Todaro,et al.  A Model for Labor Migration and Urban Unemployment in Less Developed Countries , 1969 .

[30]  Haizheng Li,et al.  A CONDITIONAL LOGIT APPROACH TO U.S. STATE-TO-STATE MIGRATION* , 2001 .