Quantifying impacts of onshore wind farms on ecosystem services at local and global scales

Energy technologies have both local and global impacts on ecosystem services, with local impacts occurring where the energy is generated, and global impacts occurring where energy feedstock or raw materials for energy infrastructure are sourced. Assessing these impacts in both local and remote locations is important but challenging. In this paper we present a first attempt to quantify the impacts of onshore wind farms on ecosystem services for the UK at local and global scales, building on approaches used for life cycle analyses of energy technologies, that consider the provenance of materials used for energy infrastructure. We first identify the lifecycle processes of onshore wind farms, and then use a systematic literature review of local impacts of onshore wind farms on ecosystem services and a ‘Broadbrush’ approach for global impacts. Results show that onshore wind farms tend to have significant positive local impacts on primary production and air quality, and tend to have negative local impacts on soil, water and livestock which are mostly associated with the operational and decommissioning stages of wind turbines in the UK. At global scale, onshore wind farms tend to have negative impacts on a number of ecosystem services, due to the processes associated with the mining of steel and concrete in other parts of the world, but this is common to all energy infrastructures. These should help wind farm developers and researchers identify and avoid adverse impacts of onshore wind farms on ecosystem services.

[1]  C. Perrings Ecological Economics after the Millennium Assessment , 2006 .

[2]  K. Wallace Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions , 2007 .

[3]  J. Morison,et al.  Resource-conserving agriculture increases yields in developing countries. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Sicong Wang,et al.  Ecological impacts of wind farms on birds: Questions, hypotheses, and research needs , 2015 .

[5]  David J. Smith,et al.  Ecological knowledge is lost in wealthier communities and countries. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  J. Boyd,et al.  What are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting Units , 2006 .

[7]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[9]  S. Suh,et al.  Application of hybrid life cycle approaches to emerging energy technologies--the case of wind power in the UK. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Forest Isbell,et al.  Biodiversity impacts ecosystem productivity as much as resources, disturbance, or herbivory , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[12]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[13]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, Part I: a critical review. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  R. Costanza,et al.  Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making , 2009 .

[15]  Sicong Wang,et al.  Impacts of wind energy on environment: A review , 2015 .

[16]  J. Aronson,et al.  The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity , 2010 .

[17]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  An invitation to ecological economics. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  S. Hinsley,et al.  The impact of growing miscanthus for biomass on farmland bird populations , 2009 .