Biogeochemical marine ecosystem models II: the effect of physiological detail on model performance

Abstract The level of detail required to efficiently capture system dynamics in ecosystem models has not been well defined. To this end an ecosystem model of a generalised temperate bay, Bay Model 2 (BM2), was constructed. It is a trophically diverse biogeochemical model built using the functional groups from another ecosystem model, the Integrated Generic Bay Ecosystem Model (IGBEM) and the general framework from a model of Port Phillip Bay (PPB), Australia. BM2 captures the essential features of real marine systems, it is also capable of reproducing realistic levels of biomass and conforms with known ecological relationships. The model’s performance is not as good for some of the poorly known groups (like infauna) or when environmental conditions undergo extreme change. Despite this, the overall performance of BM2 indicated, it is as capable of representing systems as accurately as more physiologically detailed ecosystem models, such as IGBEM. This shows that physiological detail is not always required and that simpler formulations, such as those employed in BM2, are generally adequate for learning and general predictive purposes. This is important because, in comparison with IGBEM, BM2 uses substantially fewer parameters and has lower development, computation and maintenance costs.

[1]  J. Steele,et al.  The role of predation in plankton models , 1992 .

[2]  D. Conley.  Biogeochemical nutrient cycles and nutrient management strategies , 1999, Hydrobiologia.

[3]  S. J. Walker.  Coupled hydrodynamic and transport models of Port Phillip Bay, a semi-enclosed bay in south-eastern Australia , 1999 .

[4]  M. Sleigh.  Microbes in the sea , 1987 .

[5]  Elizabeth A. Fulton,et al.  Mortality and predation in ecosystem models: is it important how these are expressed? , 2003 .

[6]  R. W. Sheldon,et al.  The Size Distribution of Particles in the OCEAN1 , 1972 .

[7]  M. Fasham,et al.  Modelling the Marine Biota , 1993 .

[8]  J. Gray.  Eutrophication in the sea , 1992 .

[9]  D. Jacobson,et al.  A Brief History of Dinoflagellate Feeding Research 1 , 1999 .

[10]  H. Marshall,et al.  Estuarine relationships between zooplankton community structure and trophic gradients , 2000 .

[11]  JC Blackford,et al.  An analysis of benthic biological dynamics in a North Sea ecosystem model , 1997 .

[12]  T. Smayda,et al.  Harmful algal blooms: Their ecophysiology and general relevance to phytoplankton blooms in the sea , 1997 .

[13]  J. W. Hedgpeth,et al.  Models and muddles , 1977, Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen.

[14]  D. W. Coats,et al.  Mixotrophy in gyrodinium galatheanum (DINOPHYCEAE): grazing responses to light intensity and inorganic nutrients* , 2000 .

[15]  Keith Sainsbury,et al.  Symposium overview: incorporating ecosystem objectives within fisheries management , 2000 .

[16]  D. Stoecker.  Mixotrophy among Dinoflagellates 1 , 1999 .

[17]  J. G. Baretta-Bekker,et al.  Microbial dynamics in the marine ecosystem model ERSEM II with decoupled carbon assimilation and nutrient uptake , 1997 .

[18]  J Tober,et al.  Abundance, Biomass, and Species Richness of Fish Communities in Relation to Nitrogen-Loading Rates of Waquoit Bay Estuaries. , 1996, The Biological bulletin.

[19]  E. Fulton,et al.  Effect of complexity on marine ecosystem models , 2003 .

[20]  G. McManus,et al.  Food type and concentration affect chlorophyll and carotenoid destruction during copepod feeding , 1999 .

[21]  R. Herbert.  Nitrogen cycling in coastal marine ecosystems. , 1999, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[22]  J. Hall,et al.  The importance of phytoflagellate, heterotrophic flagellate and ciliate grazing on bacteria and picophytoplankton sized prey in a coastal marine environment , 1993 .

[23]  J. Heymans,et al.  Energy Flow in the Kromme Estuarine Ecosystem, St Francis Bay, South Africa , 1995 .

[24]  V. Ittekkot,et al.  Preferential recycling of nutrients—the ocean's way to increase new production and to pass nutrient limitation? , 1999 .

[25]  A. Skovgaard.  Mixotrophy in Fragilidium subglobosum (Dinophyceae): growth and grazing responses as functions of light intensity , 1996 .

[26]  M. R. Droop,et al.  The nutrient status of algal cells in continuous culture , 1974, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[27]  C. Walters,et al.  Measurement Errors and Uncertainty in Parameter Estimates for Stock and Recruitment , 1981 .

[28]  W. Kemp,et al.  Ecosystem model of an estuarine submersed plant community: Calibration and simulation of eutrophication responses , 1996 .

[29]  H. Jeong,et al.  Feeding by the mixotrophic thecate dinoflagellate Fragilidium cf. mexicanum on red-tide and toxic dinoflagellates , 1999 .

[30]  John Parslow,et al.  The analysis of alternative formulations in a simple model of a coastal ecosystem , 1999 .

[31]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  Mathematical Models in Biological Oceanography. , 1984 .

[32]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Zooplankton mortality and the dynamical behaviour of plankton population models , 1999, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[33]  P. Ruardij,et al.  The European regional seas ecosystem model, a complex marine ecosystem model , 1995 .

[34]  Graeme E. Batley,et al.  Port Phillip Bay Environmental Study Final Report , 1996 .

[35]  Andrew M. Edwards,et al.  The role of higher predation in plankton population models , 2000 .

[36]  P. Schwinghamer.  Characteristic Size Distributions of Integral Benthic Communities , 1981 .

[37]  H. Lotze,et al.  Control of macroalgal blooms at early developmental stages: Pilayella littoralis versus Enteromorpha spp. , 1999, Oecologia.

[38]  John Parslow,et al.  Modelling of nutrient impacts in Port Phillip Bay : a semi-enclosed marine Australian ecosystem , 1999 .

[39]  Günther Radach,et al.  Ecological modelling of the North Sea , 1991 .

[40]  C. Pahl‐Wostl.  Dynamic structure of a food web model : comparison with a food chain model , 1997 .

[41]  H. L. Stickney,et al.  The impact of mixotrophy on planktonic marine ecosystems , 2000 .

[42]  M. Droop.  SOME THOUGHTS ON NUTRIENT LIMITATION IN ALGAE 1 , 1973 .

[43]  J. C. Blackford,et al.  A structure and methodology for marine ecosystem modelling , 1995 .

[44]  H. Thomas,et al.  New production enhanced by nutrient supply from non-Redfield remineralisation of freshly produced organic material , 2000 .

[45]  N. Broekhuizen.  Simulating motile algae using a mixed Eulerian-Lagrangian approach: does motility promote dinoflagellate persistence or co-existence with diatoms? , 1999 .

[46]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation , 2001 .

[47]  C. Legrand,et al.  Induced phagotrophy in the photosynthetic dinoflagellate Heterocapsa triquetra , 1998 .

[48]  J. Adolf,et al.  FEEDING, PIGMENTATION, PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND GROWTH OF THE MIXOTROPHIC DINOFLAGELLATE GYRODINIUM GALATHEANUM , 1999 .

[49]  W. Gurney,et al.  Modelling the predation, growth and population dynamics of fish within a spatially-resolved shelf-sea ecosystem model , 1995 .

[50]  D. Alongi.  Coastal Ecosystem Processes , 1997 .

[51]  Y. Monbet,et al.  Control of phytoplankton biomass in estuaries: A comparative analysis of microtidal and macrotidal estuaries , 1992 .

[52]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  The global carbon cycle. , 1990 .