Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns

Mammographic density and parenchymal patterns have been shown to be associated with the risk of developing breast cancer. Two groups of women: gene-mutation carriers and low-risk women were included in this study. Power spectral analysis was performed within parenchymal regions of 172 digitized craniocaudal normal mammograms of the BRCA1/BRCA2 gene-mutation carriers and those of women at low-risk of developing breast cancer. The power law spectrum of the form, P(f)=B/fβ was evaluated for the mammographic patterns. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the performance of exponent β as a decision variable in the task of distinguishing between high and low-risk subjects. Power spectral analysis of mammograms demonstrated that mammographic parenchymal patterns have a power-law spectrum of the form, P(f)=B/fβ where f is radial spatial frequency, with the average β values of 2.92 and 2.47 for the gene-mutation carriers and for the low-risk women, respectively. Az values of 0.90 and 0.89 were achieved in distinguishing between the gene-mutation carriers and the low-risk women with the individual image β value as the decision variable in the entire database and the age-matched group, respectively.

[1]  Zhimin Huo,et al.  Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. , 2002, Radiology.

[2]  P. Taylor,et al.  Measuring image texture to separate "difficult" from "easy" mammograms. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  Caroline Diorio,et al.  Wolfe's parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications? , 2003, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[4]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms , 2004, CARS.

[5]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[6]  Martin J. Yaffe,et al.  Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention , 2001, Current oncology reports.

[7]  J. Wolfe Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[9]  Arthur E. Burgess,et al.  Mammographic structure: data preparation and spatial statistics analysis , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[10]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location. , 2004, Medical physics.

[11]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection. , 2000, Medical physics.

[12]  R. Warren,et al.  Mammographic patterns as a predictive biomarker of breast cancer risk: effect of tamoxifen. , 1999, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[13]  C E Metz,et al.  Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[14]  C. Byrne,et al.  Studying mammographic density: implications for understanding breast cancer. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[16]  N F Boyd,et al.  Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk , 1997, Cancer.