Trends in syntactic parsing: anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Edward Gibson,et al. The processing of extraposed structures in English , 2012, Cognition.
[2] Frank Keller,et al. Probabilistic Modeling of Discourse-Aware Sentence Processing , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[3] M. Baltin,et al. The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .
[4] Fernanda Ferreira,et al. The 'Good Enough' Approach to Language Comprehension , 2007, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[5] Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al. Reanalysis in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Current Constraint-Based and Two-Stage Models , 2001 .
[6] Liina Pylkkänen,et al. The Syntax-Semantics Interface , 2006 .
[7] Roger Levy,et al. A noisy-channel model of rational human sentence comprehension under uncertain input , 2008, EMNLP 2008.
[8] R. Levy. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.
[9] Daniel J. Acheson,et al. The Rhymes that the Reader Perused Confused the Meaning: Phonological Effects during On-line Sentence Comprehension. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.
[10] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .
[11] Z. Harris,et al. Foundations of language , 1941 .
[12] G. Altmann,et al. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.
[13] F. Ferreira,et al. The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: a psychometric approach. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[14] Robin K. Morris,et al. The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited , 2003 .
[15] K. Rayner. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.
[16] M. Pickering,et al. An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[17] M. Pickering,et al. Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study , 1998 .
[18] S. Piantadosi,et al. Info/information theory: Speakers choose shorter words in predictive contexts , 2013, Cognition.
[19] Matthew J. Traxler,et al. Introduction to Psycholinguistics: Understanding Language Science , 2011 .
[20] Edward Gibson,et al. The Interaction of Syntactic and Lexical Information Sources in Language Processing: The Case of the Noun-verb Ambiguity , 2012 .
[21] Zenzi M. Griffin,et al. Properties of Spoken Language Production , 2006 .
[22] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[23] A. Hollingworth,et al. Thematic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.
[24] F. Ferreira,et al. Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations , 2013 .
[25] Nathaniel J. Smith,et al. The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic , 2013, Cognition.
[26] Marius Janciauskas,et al. Language adaptation and learning: Getting explicit about implicit learning , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[27] P. Gordon,et al. Memory interference during language processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[28] Kathryn Bock,et al. On the parity of structural persistence in language production and comprehension , 2014, Cognition.
[29] Roger C. Schank,et al. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures , 1978 .
[30] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Distributed Representations, Simple Recurrent Networks, and Grammatical Structure , 1991, Mach. Learn..
[31] M. Pickering,et al. Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution , 1998 .
[32] WILLIAM MARSLEN-WILSON,et al. Linguistic Structure and Speech Shadowing at Very Short Latencies , 1973, Nature.
[33] Robin K. Morris,et al. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[34] Janet D. Fodor,et al. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.
[35] Robin K. Morris,et al. Priming in Sentence Processing: Intralexical Spreading Activation, Schemas, and Situation Models , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[36] David J. Hess,et al. Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension , 1995 .
[37] Lyn Frazier,et al. ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .
[38] C. Clifton,et al. Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading , 2008, Memory & cognition.
[39] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993 .
[40] Karl G. D. Bailey,et al. Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .
[41] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[42] John T. Hale,et al. What a Rational Parser Would Do , 2011, Cogn. Sci..
[43] K. Rayner,et al. Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[44] P. Schwanenflugel,et al. Semantic relatedness and the scope of facilitation for upcoming words in sentences. , 1988 .
[45] Donald Mitchell,et al. Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. , 1987 .
[46] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Out for a Smoke , 2010, Psychological science.
[47] Mark Steedman,et al. Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.
[48] Wonil Choi,et al. Word skipping during sentence reading: effects of lexicality on parafoveal processing , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[49] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Eye Movements During Mindless Reading , 2010, Psychological science.
[50] Steven G. Luke,et al. Effects of plausibility on structural priming. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[51] J. Elman,et al. Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension. , 2012, Journal of memory and language.
[52] WILLIAM MARSLEN-WILSON,et al. Processing structure of sentence perception , 1975, Nature.
[53] Matthew W. Crocker,et al. Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Frequency-Based Accounts , 2000 .
[54] Ellen F. Lau,et al. Dissociating N400 Effects of Prediction from Association in Single-word Contexts , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[55] P. Gordon,et al. The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.
[56] Aniruddh D. Patel,et al. Structural integration in language and music: Evidence for a shared system , 2009, Memory & cognition.
[57] Effects of sentence constraint on priming in natural language comprehension. , 2000 .
[58] K. Rayner,et al. The psychology of reading , 1989 .
[59] Steven G. Luke,et al. Context Strengthens Initial Misinterpretations of Text , 2011 .
[60] Leon Bergen,et al. Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[61] W. Levelt,et al. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .
[62] M J Pickering,et al. Strategies for processing unbounded dependencies: lexical information and verb-argument assignment. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[63] J. Fodor. The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .
[64] Christoph Scheepers,et al. Structural Priming Across Cognitive Domains , 2011, Psychological science.
[65] Martin J. Pickering,et al. Evidence against the use of subcategorisation frequency in the processing of unbounded dependencies , 2003 .
[66] Edward Gibson,et al. Syntax encodes information structure: Evidence from on-line reading comprehension , 2011 .
[67] T. Jaeger,et al. Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience , 2013, Cognition.
[68] Katherine A. DeLong,et al. Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.
[69] M. Traxler. A Hierarchical Linear Modeling Analysis of Working Memory and Implicit Prosody in the Resolution of Adjunct Attachment Ambiguity , 2009, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[70] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .
[71] E. Gibson. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.