Matched source-channel communication for field estimation in wireless sensor network

Sensing, processing and communication must be jointly optimized for efficient operation of resource-limited wireless sensor networks. We propose a novel source-channel matching approach for distributed field estimation that naturally integrates these basic operations and facilitates a unified analysis of the impact of key parameters (number of nodes, power, field complexity) on estimation accuracy. At the heart of our approach is a distributed source-channel communication architecture that matches the spatial scale of field coherence with the spatial scale of node synchronization for phase-coherent communication: the sensor field is uniformly partitioned into multiple cells and the nodes in each cell coherently communicate simple statistics of their measurements to the destination via a dedicated noisy multiple access channel (MAC). Essentially, the optimal field estimate in each cell is implicitly computed at the destination via the coherent spatial averaging inherent in the MAC, resulting in optimal power-distortion scaling with the number of nodes. In general, smoother fields demand lower per-node power but require node synchronization over larger scales for optimal estimation. In particular, optimal mean-square distortion scaling can be achieved with sub-linear power scaling. Our results also reveal a remarkable power-density tradeoff inherent in our approach: increasing the sensor density reduces the total power required to achieve a desired distortion. A direct consequence is that consistent field estimation is possible, in principle, even with vanishing total power in the limit of high sensor density.

[1]  M. Vetterli,et al.  Power-bandwidth-distortion scaling laws for sensor networks , 2004, Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2004. IPSN 2004.

[2]  Kannan Ramchandran,et al.  Distributed Sampling for Dense Sensor Networks: A "Bit-Conservation Principle" , 2003, IPSN.

[3]  Urbashi Mitra,et al.  Estimating inhomogeneous fields using wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[4]  Mingyan Liu,et al.  On the Many-to-One Transport Capacity of a Dense Wireless Sensor Network and the Compressibility of Its Data , 2003, IPSN.

[5]  R. Nowak,et al.  Multiscale likelihood analysis and complexity penalized estimation , 2004, math/0406424.

[6]  Sergio D. Servetto On the Feasibility of Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks , 2002 .

[7]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Distributed classification of Gaussian space-time sources in wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  R. DeVore,et al.  Nonlinear approximation , 1998, Acta Numerica.

[9]  Akbar M. Sayeed,et al.  A Statistical Signal Modeling Framework for Sensor Networks , 2004 .

[10]  A. P. Korostelev,et al.  MiniMax Methods for Image Reconstruction , 1993 .

[11]  Kannan Ramchandran,et al.  Distributed compression in a dense microsensor network , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[12]  Akbar M. Sayeed,et al.  Optimal Distributed Detection Strategies for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2004 .

[13]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[14]  Michael Gastpar,et al.  Source-Channel Communication in Sensor Networks , 2003, IPSN.

[15]  A. Tsybakov,et al.  Minimax theory of image reconstruction , 1993 .