Fault Detection in Managed Pressure Drilling Using Slow Feature Analysis

Correct detection of drilling abnormal incidents while minimizing false alarms is a crucial measure to decrease the non-productive time and, thus, decrease the total drilling cost. With the recent development of drilling technology and innovation of down-hole signal transmitting method, abundant drilling data are collected and stored in the electronic driller’s database. The availability of such data provides new opportunities for rapid and accurate fault detection; however, data-driven fault detection has seen limited practical application in well drilling processes. One particular concern is how to distinguish “controllable” process changes, e.g., due to set-point changes, from truly abnormal events that should be considered as faults. This is highly relevant for the managed pressure drilling technology, where the operating pressure window is often narrow resulting in necessary set-point changes at different depths. However, the classical data-driven fault detection methods, such as principal component analysis and independent component analysis, are unable to distinguish normal set-point changes from abnormal faults. To address this challenge, a slow feature analysis (SFA)-based fault detection method is applied. The SFA-based method furnishes four monitoring charts containing more information that could be synthetically utilized to correctly differentiate set-point changes from faults. Furthermore, the evaluation about controller performance is provided for drilling operator. Simulation studies with a commercial high-fidelity simulator, Drillbench, demonstrate the effectiveness of the introduced approach.

[1]  Ole Morten Aamo,et al.  Model-based estimation and control of in/out-flux during drilling , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[2]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Slow Feature Analysis: Unsupervised Learning of Invariances , 2002, Neural Computation.

[3]  Ole Morten Aamo,et al.  Control of heave-induced pressure fluctuations in managed pressure drilling , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[4]  Ole Morten Aamo,et al.  Control of heave-induced pressure fluctuations in managed pressure drilling , 2012 .

[5]  Seyed Reza Shadizadeh,et al.  Early Kick Detection Using Real Time Data Analysis with Dynamic Neural Network: A Case Study in Iranian Oil Fields , 2010 .

[6]  Bernard D Goldstein,et al.  The Gulf oil spill. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Laurenz Wiskott,et al.  Slow feature analysis yields a rich repertoire of complex cell properties. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[8]  Maximo Hernandez,et al.  High-Speed Wired Drillstring Telemetry Network Delivers Increased Safety, Efficiency, Reliability, and Productivity to the Drilling Industry , 2008 .

[9]  Gerhard Nygaard,et al.  Nonlinear adaptive observer for managed pressure drilling system , 2011, 2011 6th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications.

[10]  Ole Morten Aamo,et al.  Simplified Hydraulics Model Used for Intelligent Estimation of Downhole Pressure for a Managed-Pressure-Drilling Control System , 2012 .

[11]  Mary Ann Lundteigen,et al.  A DBN-Based Risk Assessment Model for Prediction and Diagnosis of Offshore Drilling Incidents , 2016, Bayesian Networks in Fault Diagnosis.

[12]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Concurrent monitoring of operating condition deviations and process dynamics anomalies with slow feature analysis , 2015 .

[13]  H. C. Juvkam-Wold,et al.  Analyses and Procedures for Kick Detection in Subsea Mudlift Drilling , 2007 .

[14]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond , 2003 .

[15]  Ali Cinar,et al.  Monitoring, fault diagnosis, fault-tolerant control and optimization: Data driven methods , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[16]  Andrew David Craig,et al.  Drillstring Network 2.0: An Enhanced Drillstring Network Based on 100 Wells of Experience , 2014 .

[17]  Yuan Yao,et al.  Mixture Discriminant Monitoring: A Hybrid Method for Statistical Process Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis/Isolation , 2013 .

[18]  Lars Imsland,et al.  Fault diagnosis in managed pressure drilling using nonlinear adaptive observers , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).

[19]  Tao Chen,et al.  On reducing false alarms in multivariate statistical process control , 2010 .

[20]  Dave Elliott Managed Pressure Drilling Erases the Lines For generations , 2011 .

[21]  Don M. Hannegan,et al.  MPD - Uniquely Applicable to Methane Hydrate Drilling , 2004 .

[22]  Richard E. Turner,et al.  A Maximum-Likelihood Interpretation for Slow Feature Analysis , 2007, Neural Computation.

[23]  Si-Zhao Joe Qin,et al.  Survey on data-driven industrial process monitoring and diagnosis , 2012, Annu. Rev. Control..

[24]  Dacheng Tao,et al.  Slow Feature Analysis for Human Action Recognition , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[25]  Knut Steinar Bjorkevoll,et al.  Statistical Method for Detection of Poor Hole Cleaning and Stuck Pipe , 2009 .

[26]  Maren Mæland Managed Pressure Drilling: The Solaris Prospect - HPHT Exploration well , 2013 .

[27]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Adaptive observer for kick detection and switched control for bottomhole pressure regulation and kick attenuation during managed pressure drilling , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[28]  Dexian Huang,et al.  Slow feature analysis for monitoring and diagnosis of control performance , 2016 .

[29]  Rolf Johan Lorentzen,et al.  Wired Drill Pipe Telemetry Enables Real-Time Evaluation of Kick During Managed Pressure Drilling , 2010 .

[30]  Laurenz Wiskott,et al.  An extension of slow feature analysis for nonlinear blind source separation , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..