Sacral neuromodulation for neurogenic bladder dysfunction in children.

PURPOSE We report a prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate the possible benefits of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for the management of neurogenic bladder dysfunction in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included in the study subjects between the ages of 5 and 21 years presenting with urinary incontinence due to neurogenic bladder. Before study inclusion all previous treatment was discontinued. Patients were randomly divided into the control group treated conventionally and the implant group treated with SNM. Treatment outcome was compared every 3 months for a minimum of 12 months based on clinical examination, voiding diary and urodynamic evaluation. RESULTS A total of 26 boys and 16 girls with a mean age of 11.9 years were enrolled in this study. There were 21 patients in each group. The main underlying etiology was spina bifida. The 2 groups were comparable with regard to sex, age and urodynamic variables. Total disappearance of urinary leakage was observed in 1 patient who underwent implantation but he still required intermittent catheterization. Comparison of urodynamic variables disclosed no significant statistical difference except with regard to functional bladder capacity which was better in the control group and the leak point pressure which was better in the implant group (p <0.05). Evaluation of interindividual variations in the implant group revealed significant improvement in compliance and functional bladder capacity at 6 and 9 months but not at 12 months. Nine patients in the implant group reported improvement in intestinal transit, 5 total disappearance of urinary infection and 6 persistent sensation of a full bladder. No patient in the control group reported any improvement. Revision surgery was required in 3 cases due to lead migration, faulty connection and wound infection. CONCLUSIONS SNM is a promising new therapeutic modality. Implant placement is minimally invasive, nondestructive and reversible. Use in children with neurogenic bladder has not been previously reported. Although some improvement was noted in patients treated with SNM, the difference with the control group was not significant. A larger multicenter study is warranted to evaluate SNM.

[1]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Neuromodulation of voiding dysfunction and pelvic pain , 1991, World Journal of Urology.

[2]  S L Stanton,et al.  The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function , 1989, World Journal of Urology.

[3]  A. Ruffion,et al.  Traitement de l'incontinence urinaire secondaire à une hyperactivité vésicale par neuromodulation sacrée , 2003 .

[4]  R. Bruni,et al.  Sacral nerve neuromodulation improves physical, psychological and social quality of life in patients with fecal incontinence , 2002, Techniques in Coloproctology.

[5]  M. Spinelli,et al.  Chronic sacral neuromodulation in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: results from a national register. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[6]  J. R. Ruud Bosch,et al.  Sacral nerve neuromodulation in the treatment of refractory motor urge incontinence , 2001, Current opinion in urology.

[7]  M. Elhilali,et al.  Sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of urgency-frequency symptoms: a multicenter study on efficacy and safety. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[8]  B. Bemelmans,et al.  Sacral Root Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Refractory Urinary Urge Incontinence: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial , 2000, European Urology.

[9]  P. Longhurst,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation for the management of voiding dysfunction. , 2000, Reviews in urology.

[10]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Neurostimulation and Neuromodulation: A Guide to Selecting the Right Urologic Patient , 1998, European Urology.

[11]  J. Bosch,et al.  Neuromodulation: urodynamic effects of sacral (S3) spinal nerve stimulation in patients with detrusor instability or detrusor hyperflexia , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[12]  R. Janknegt,et al.  Clinical results of sacral neuromodulation for chronic voiding dysfunction using unilateral sacral foramen electrodes , 1998, World Journal of Urology.

[13]  W. Oosterlinck,et al.  The urodynamic evaluation of neuromodulation in patients with voiding dysfunction , 1997 .

[14]  M. Elhilali,et al.  Neural stimulation for chronic voiding dysfunctions. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[15]  E. Tanagho Neuromodulation in the management of voiding dysfunction in children. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[16]  J. Aster,et al.  Fatal disseminated mycobacterial infection following intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[17]  D. Rushton,et al.  Long-term follow-up of patients with sacral anterior root stimulator implants , 1990, Paraplegia.

[18]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Electrical stimulation in the clinical management of the neurogenic bladder. , 1988, The Journal of urology.

[19]  P. Mollard,et al.  [The neurogenic bladder in children. I. Introduction]. , 1985, Acta urologica Belgica.