Effects of varying dietary forage particle size in two concentrate levels on chewing activity, ruminal mat characteristics, and passage in dairy cows.

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of varying dietary forage particle size on chewing activity, ruminal mat characteristics, passage, and in situ ruminal and total tract digestion in dairy cows at a low- and high-concentrate inclusion. The experiment was designed as a 4 x 4 Latin square with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Four ruminally cannulated late-lactating dairy cows were restrictively fed (17 kg of dry matter/d), in four 23-d periods, 1 of 4 different diets varying in the theoretical particle size (6 and 30 mm) of hay (56.6% NDF of dry matter) and in the levels (approximately 20 and 60%, dry matter basis) of a cereal-based concentrate. Ingredients of the ration were offered separately to the cows; dietary hay and low-level concentrate were offered twice daily at 0800 and 1600 h, whereas concentrate of the high-level treatment was offered in 4 meals a day at 0800, 1200, 1600, and 1900 h. This study showed that altering the forage particle size from 6 to 30 mm in a low-concentrate diet significantly increased the rumination time and ruminal mat consistency without affecting ruminal fermentation and passage. Further, particle breakdown and proportion of mat in the rumen increased, and in situ hay dry matter degradability improved, which in turn indicated a higher capacity of ruminal digesta to degrade fiber. On the other hand, increasing the forage particle size in a diet containing a high amount of concentrate increased the proportion of dry matter retained on a 1.18-mm screen from 37.5 to 42.0% and extended the rumination time by 100 min/d, as well as increasing the ruminal mat consistency. However, ruminal particle breakdown, short-term ruminal pH, fibrolytic capacity of the digesta, and proportion of mat in the rumen decreased. This was also reflected in a higher bailable liquid pool, increased fractional passage rate of solid digesta from the reticulorumen, and increased retention time in the hindgut, which in turn indicated a shift of fiber digestion from the rumen to the lower digestive tract. This study showed that the response of chewing or ruminating activity alone seemed to be insufficient to assess the dietary physical effectiveness or fiber adequacy in limit-fed dairy cows when high-concentrate diets were fed separately. Based on the results of this study, we concluded that inclusion of coarsely chopped hay in the high-concentrate diet did not appear to further improve rumen conditions and digestion when the rations were formulated to exceed the fiber requirements in limit-fed dairy cows.

[1]  Q. Zebeli,et al.  Effects of physically effective fiber on digestive processes and milk fat content in early lactating dairy cows fed total mixed rations. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Effects of physically effective fiber on chewing activity and ruminal pH of dairy cows fed diets based on barley silage. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  M. Tafaj,et al.  Influence of fiber content and concentrate level on chewing activity, ruminal digestion, digesta passage rate and nutrient digestibility in dairy cows in late lactation , 2005 .

[4]  Q. Zebeli,et al.  Effects of particle size of a total mixed ration on in vivo ruminal fermentation patterns and inocula characteristics used for in vitro gas production , 2005 .

[5]  J. Russell,et al.  The Effect of Cellobiose, Glucose, and Cellulose on the Survival of Fibrobacter succinogenes A3C Cultures Grown Under Ammonia Limitation , 2004, Current Microbiology.

[6]  P. Kononoff,et al.  The effect of reducing alfalfa haylage particle size on cows in early lactation. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Effects of particle size of alfalfa-based dairy cow diets on chewing activity, ruminal fermentation, and milk production. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  J. France,et al.  The role of dynamic modelling in understanding the microbial contribution to rumen function , 2002, Nutrition Research Reviews.

[9]  J. Elizondo Estimación lineal de los requerimientos nutricionales del NRC para ganado de leche , 2002 .

[10]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Barley processing, forage:concentrate, and forage length effects on chewing and digesta passage in lactating cows. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  E. Kolver,et al.  Diurnal variation in pH reduces digestion and synthesis of microbial protein when pasture is fermented in continuous culture. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  J. Matis,et al.  Marker concentration patterns of labelled leaf and stem particles in the rumen of cattle grazing bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) analysed by reference to a raft model* , 2001, British Journal of Nutrition.

[13]  R. Stock,et al.  Maximal replacement of forage and concentrate with a new wet corn milling product for lactating dairy cows. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  N. St-Pierre,et al.  Effects of grain variability and processing on starch utilization by lactating dairy cattle , 2001 .

[15]  P. Weimer Manipulating ruminal fermentation: a microbial ecological perspective. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[16]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Minimum versus optimum concentrations of fiber in dairy cow diets based on barley silage and concentrates of barley or corn. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  M. Allen Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physically effective fiber. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  D. Mertens Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  J. Peyraud,et al.  Retention time of feed particles and liquids in the stomachs and intestines of dairy cows. Direct measurement and calculations based on faecal collection. , 1997, Reproduction, nutrition, development.

[20]  R. Grant,et al.  Altered ruminal mat consistency by high percentages of soybean hulls fed to lactating dairy cows. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  M. Poore,et al.  Influence of model and marker on digesta kinetic estimates for sheep. , 1992, Journal of animal science.

[22]  P. V. Soest,et al.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  J. Patterson,et al.  Influence of in Situ Bag Rinsing Technique on Determination of Dry Matter Disappearance , 1990 .

[24]  D. J. Minson,et al.  Large particle breakdown by cattle eating ryegrass and alfalfa. , 1988, Journal of animal science.

[25]  D. S. Fisher,et al.  Estimation of mean and median particle size of ruminant digesta. , 1988, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  A. Dobson,et al.  Aspects of digestive physiology in ruminants , 1988 .

[27]  P. H. Robinson,et al.  Influence of declining level of feed intake and varying the proportion of starch in the concentrate on rumen ingesta quantity, composition and kinetics of ingesta turnover in dairy cows , 1987 .

[28]  W. Hoover Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion. , 1986, Journal of dairy science.

[29]  J. G. Welch Rumination, Particle Size and Passage from the Rumen , 1982 .

[30]  L. O. Ely,et al.  Assessing Minimum Amounts and Form of Roughages in Ruminant Diets: Roughage Value Index System , 1981 .

[31]  I. McDonald A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen , 1981, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[32]  P. V. Van Soest,et al.  Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. , 1980, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.