Hidden factors and handling strategies on virtual in-situ sensor calibration in building energy systems: Prior information and cancellation effect

Abstract Sensor errors greatly affect the performance of control, diagnosis, and optimization systems within building energy systems, negatively impacting energy efficiency. Virtual in-situ sensor calibration (VIC), a Bayesian theory based method, can improve building energy performance by calibrating erroneous sensors in working building energy systems on a large scale. Working sensors do not need to be removed nor will reference sensors need to be added, as is done in a conventional calibration. To improve the calibration accuracy, hidden factors and their negative effects on the accuracy of a VIC must be addressed properly. In this study, we define (1) prior information and (2) cancellation effects as the negative effects. The suggested VIC method is applied to a single energy system component and to a LiBr-H2O absorption refrigeration system, respectively, to discuss the two primary effects (mentioned above). In addition to adding data sets, two strategies—inclusion of local calibration and conducting repetitive prior updates—are proposed to solve the hidden factors’ issue. The case study (1) shows that the proposed local calibration with the prior updates can solve the two negative effects, thus suggesting the high calibration accuracy and (2) demonstrates that the calibrated measurements improve the accuracy of energy performance analysis for a building energy system (up to 17.82%).

[1]  F. L. Lansing,et al.  Computer modeling of a single-stage lithium bromide/water absorption refrigeration unit , 1976 .

[2]  Shengwei Wang,et al.  A system-level fault detection and diagnosis method for low delta-T syndrome in the complex HVAC systems , 2016 .

[3]  Geert Van Ham,et al.  Economic impact of persistent sensor and actuator faults in concrete core activated office buildings , 2017 .

[4]  I. Eames,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of absorption refrigeration cycles using the second law of thermodynamics method , 1995 .

[5]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1997 .

[6]  Dani Gamerman,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference , 1997 .

[7]  Doosam Song,et al.  A calibration method for whole-building airflow simulation in high-rise residential buildings , 2015 .

[8]  Sungmin Yoon,et al.  Extended virtual in-situ calibration method in building systems using Bayesian inference , 2017 .

[9]  Zhimin Du,et al.  Fault diagnosis for temperature, flow rate and pressure sensors in VAV systems using wavelet neural network , 2009 .

[10]  Yuebin Yu,et al.  Virtual partition surface temperature sensor based on linear parametric model , 2016 .

[11]  James E. Braun,et al.  A review of virtual sensing technology and application in building systems , 2011, HVAC&R Research.

[12]  Y. Kaita,et al.  Thermodynamic properties of lithium bromide-water solutions at high temperatures. , 2001 .

[13]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[14]  James E. Braun,et al.  Virtual Refrigerant Pressure Sensors for Use in Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis of Vapor-Compression Equipment , 2009 .

[15]  Shen Wei,et al.  Identifying informative energy data in Bayesian calibration of building energy models , 2016 .

[16]  Haorong Li,et al.  Virtual in-situ calibration method in building systems , 2015 .

[17]  James E. Braun,et al.  Development, Evaluation, and Demonstration of a Virtual Refrigerant Charge Sensor , 2009 .

[18]  Da-Wen Sun,et al.  Thermodynamic design data and optimum design maps for absorption refrigeration systems , 1997 .

[19]  Yiqun Pan,et al.  An automated optimization method for calibrating building energy simulation models with measured data: Orientation and a case study , 2016 .

[20]  R. Dudley,et al.  Uniform Central Limit Theorems: Notation Index , 2014 .

[21]  Zhiwei Wang,et al.  Fault detection and diagnosis of chillers using Bayesian network merged distance rejection and multi-source non-sensor information , 2017 .

[22]  Sungmin Yoon,et al.  A quantitative comparison of statistical and deterministic methods on virtual in-situ calibration in building systems , 2017 .

[23]  Paul Ruyssevelt,et al.  ExRET-Opt: An automated exergy/exergoeconomic simulation framework for building energy retrofit analysis and design optimisation , 2017 .

[24]  Tianzhen Hong,et al.  Modeling of HVAC operational faults in building performance simulation , 2017 .

[25]  Yuebin Yu,et al.  A review of fault detection and diagnosis methodologies on air-handling units , 2014 .

[26]  Seong-Hwan Yoon,et al.  Stochastic comparison between simplified energy calculation and dynamic simulation , 2013 .

[27]  Yeonsook Heo,et al.  Calibration of building energy models for retrofit analysis under uncertainty , 2012 .

[28]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[29]  A. L. Dexter,et al.  A fuzzy sensor for measuring the mixed air temperature in air-handling units , 2005 .