Simulation study of a bottleneck-based dispatching policy for a maintenance workforce

Maintenance is important for production operations and for continuous improvement. Appropriate dispatching of the maintenance workforce to quickly respond to equipment failures and carry out preventive services can improve system productivity. The first-come-first-served policy is typically used in many manufacturing industries. In this paper, we present a priority-based dispatching policy, a dynamic bottleneck policy, based on the analysis of real-time data. In such a policy, priority is assigned to the bottleneck machine after a fixed time period, and the maintenance worker will service the high-priority machine (i.e. bottleneck machine) first when multiple service requests are received. It is shown by extensive simulation experiments that this policy can lead to a greater improvement in system throughput compared with the first-come-first-served policy. To implement such a policy, the appropriate time period for data collection and the frequency for carrying out bottleneck analysis are investigated. In addition, a sensitivity study suggests that the results obtained are insensitive to machine downtime, efficiency, and reliability models.

[1]  F. A. van der Duyn Schouten,et al.  Maintenance optimization of a production system with buffer capacity , 1995 .

[2]  Semyon M. Meerkov,et al.  A system-theoretic property of serial production lines: improvability , 1993, Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[3]  El-Kébir Boukas,et al.  Optimal control of manufacturing flow and preventive maintenance , 1996 .

[4]  Russell D. Meller,et al.  The impact of preventive maintenance on system cost and buffer size , 1996 .

[5]  Jong-Tae Lim,et al.  Bottlenecks in serial production lines: A system-theoretic approach , 1996 .

[6]  Philip A. Scarf,et al.  On the application of mathematical models in maintenance , 1997 .

[7]  Mehmet Savsar,et al.  Simulation analysis of maintenance policies in just‐in‐time production systems , 1997 .

[8]  Farhad Azadivar,et al.  Use of simulation in optimization of maintenance policies , 1998, 1998 Winter Simulation Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36274).

[9]  T. Teyner,et al.  Maintenance scheduling and staffing policies in a wafer fabrication facility , 1998, ICMTS 1998.

[10]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  On the impact of optimisation models in maintenance decision making: the state of the art , 1998 .

[11]  Sudeep Sarkar,et al.  Optimal preventive maintenance in a production inventory system , 1999 .

[12]  Garrison W. Greenwood,et al.  Workforce-constrained Preventive Maintenance Scheduling Using Evolution Strategies , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[13]  Ali Gharbi,et al.  Production and preventive maintenance rates control for a manufacturing system: An experimental design approach , 2000 .

[14]  Semyon M. Meerkov,et al.  c-Bottlenecks in serial production lines: Identification andapplication , 2001 .

[15]  G. Goncalves,et al.  A genetic approach to the scheduling of preventive maintenance tasks on a single product manufacturing production line , 2001 .

[16]  Hongzhou Wang,et al.  A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Salih O. Duffuaa,et al.  Critical evaluation of simulation studies in maintenance systems. , 2002 .

[18]  Kerrie N. Paige,et al.  Learning SIMUL8: The Complete Guide , 2002 .

[19]  Adolfo Crespo Márquez,et al.  Maintenance policies for a production system with constrained production rate and buffer capacity , 2003 .

[20]  Jingshan Li,et al.  Evaluation of throughput in serial production lines with non-exponential machines , 2005 .

[21]  Xiaolan Xie,et al.  Optimal joint preventive maintenance and production policies , 2005 .

[22]  Semyon M. Meerkov,et al.  How lean can lean buffers be? , 2005 .

[23]  Jingshan Li,et al.  On the coefficients of variation of uptime and downtime in manufacturing equipment , 2005 .

[24]  Semyon M. Meerkov,et al.  Lean buffering in serial production lines with non-exponential machines , 2005, OR Spectr..

[25]  Uday Kumar,et al.  Maintenance performance measurement (MPM): issues and challenges , 2006 .

[26]  Amik Garg,et al.  Maintenance management: literature review and directions , 2006 .

[27]  Robert R. Inman,et al.  EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF EXPONENTIAL AND INDEPENDENCE ASSUMPTIONS IN QUEUEING MODELS OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS , 1999 .