Design strategy for a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell flow-field capable of switching between parallel and interdigitated configurations

Abstract Novel water management strategies are important to the development of next generation polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems (PEMFCs). Parallel and interdigitated flow fields are two common types of PEMFC designs that have benefits and draw backs depending upon operating conditions. Parallel flow fields rely predominately on diffusion to deliver reactants and remove byproduct water. Interdigitated flow fields induce convective transport, known as cross flow, through the porous gas diffusion layer (GDL) and therefore are superior at water removal beneath land areas which can lead to higher cell performance. Unfortunately, forcing flow through the GDL results in higher pumping losses as the inlet pressure for interdigitated flow fields can be up to an order of magnitude greater than that for a parallel flow field. In this study a flow field capable of switching between parallel and interdigitated configurations was designed and tested. Results show, taking into account pumping losses, that using constant stoichiometry the parallel flow field results in a higher system power under low current density operation compared to the interdigitated configuration. The interdigitated flow-field configuration was observed to have lower overvoltage at elevated current densities resulting in a higher maximum power and a higher limiting current density. An optimal system power curve was produced by switching from parallel to interdigitated configuration based on which produces a higher system power at a given current density. This design method can be easily implemented with current PEMFC technology and requires minimal hardware. Some of the consequences this design has on system components are discussed.

[1]  Søren Knudsen Kær,et al.  A study of multi-phase flow through the cathode side of an interdigitated flow field using a multi-fluid model , 2010 .

[2]  Andrew Higier,et al.  Effect of gas diffusion layer compression on PEM fuel cell performance , 2006 .

[3]  Zidong Wei,et al.  A Review of Water Management in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells , 2009 .

[4]  Xianguo Li,et al.  An experimental and numerical investigation on the cross flow through gas diffusion layer in a PEM fuel cell with a serpentine flow channel , 2007 .

[5]  K. S. Dhathathreyan,et al.  Humidification studies on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell , 2001 .

[6]  David A. Harrington,et al.  Detection of Membrane Drying, Fuel Cell Flooding, and Anode Catalyst Poisoning on PEMFC Stacks by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy , 2006 .

[7]  N. Djilali,et al.  Effect of compression on liquid water transport and microstructure of PEMFC gas diffusion layers , 2007 .

[8]  Sirivatch Shimpalee,et al.  The effect of stoichiometry on dynamic behavior of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) during load change , 2004 .

[9]  G.J.M. Janssen,et al.  Water transport in the proton-exchange-membrane fuel cell: measurements of the effective drag coefficient , 2001 .

[10]  Xianguo Li,et al.  Experimental investigations on liquid water removal from the gas diffusion layer by reactant flow in a PEM fuel cell , 2010 .

[11]  Anthony D. Santamaria,et al.  Investigation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell parallel flow field with induced cross flow , 2012 .

[12]  H. Toghiani,et al.  Steady state and dynamic performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) under various operating conditions and load changes , 2006 .

[13]  Suresh G. Advani,et al.  In situ comparison of water content and dynamics in parallel, single-serpentine, and interdigitated flow fields of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells , 2010 .

[14]  T. Nguyen,et al.  A liquid water management strategy for PEM fuel cell stacks , 2003 .

[15]  Chao-Yang Wang,et al.  Modeling Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells with Large Density and Velocity Changes , 2005 .

[16]  Chi-Yuan Lee,et al.  Local Area Water Removal Analysis of a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell under Gas Purge Conditions , 2012, Sensors.

[17]  Feng-Yuan Zhang,et al.  Liquid Water Removal from a Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell , 2006 .

[18]  James Larminie,et al.  Fuel Cell Systems Explained , 2000 .

[19]  Shimshon Gottesfeld,et al.  The Water Content Dependence of Electro-Osmotic Drag in Proton-Conducting Polymer Electrolytes , 1995 .

[20]  Thomas A. Trabold,et al.  In situ investigation of water transport in an operating PEM fuel cell using neutron radiography: Part 2 – Transient water accumulation in an interdigitated cathode flow field , 2006 .

[21]  Zhongying Shi,et al.  A numerical study of flow crossover between adjacent flow channels in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell with serpentine flow field , 2008 .

[22]  Xianguo Li,et al.  Cross-leakage flow between adjacent flow channels in PEM fuel cells , 2006 .

[23]  Cy H. Fujimoto,et al.  Transport in sulfonated poly(phenylene)s: Proton conductivity, permeability, and the state of water , 2006 .

[24]  T. Nguyen,et al.  Multicomponent transport in porous electrodes of proton exchange membrane fuel cells using the interdigitated gas distributors , 1999 .

[25]  Thomas A. Trabold,et al.  In situ investigation of water transport in an operating PEM fuel cell using neutron radiography: Part 1 – Experimental method and serpentine flow field results , 2006 .

[26]  Effects of oxidant fluid properties on the mobility of water droplets in the channels of PEM fuel cell , 2005 .