This study evaluates differences between subjects at three levels of expertise in acquiring and using information obtained from a patient during the clinical interview. Endocrinologists, residents, and medical students interviewed a volunteer endocrine outpatient and provided differential diagnoses. The transcribed doctor‐patient dialogues were analyzed using cognitive methods of analysis. The methods are based on a cognitive framework for studying doctor‐patient interaction. The primary focus was on two units of knowledge acquisition: observations and findings. Observations are information units acquired from the patient's reports. Findings are more abstract units composed of clinically significant observations. Several variables based on these knowledge units were identified. Differences were found between groups in the accuracy of diagnoses and in the differential acquisition of information from the patient during the interview. These differences were manifested most clearly in terms of a series of eff...
[1]
David A. Evans,et al.
Managing coherence and context in medical problem-solving discourse.
,
1989
.
[2]
L. Brooks,et al.
The development of expertise in dermatology.
,
1989,
Archives of dermatology.
[3]
L. Jacoby,et al.
Knowledge and clinical problem‐solving
,
1985,
Medical education.
[4]
V L Patel,et al.
Differences between medical students and doctors in memory for clinical cases
,
1986,
Medical education.
[5]
L. Shulman,et al.
Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning
,
1978
.
[6]
Arthur S. Elstein,et al.
Medical Problem Solving
,
1990
.
[7]
R. Glaser,et al.
Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing x-ray pictures.
,
1988
.