NUMERICAL-CALCULATIONS OF FLOW IN A HYDROCYCLONE OPERATING WITHOUT AN AIR CORE

Abstract Steady flow in a hydrocyclone operating without an air core is modelled by a finite difference solution of the Navier-Stokes equations, following the approach of Pericleous and Rhodes, in which the shear stress due to tangential motion is derived from the familiar Prandtl momentum transport theory, applied to angular momentum. In this application, the Prandtl model breaks down very near the axis of symmetry and a boundary condition, corresponding to zero shear, must be imposed at a radius of about one mixing length to ensure realistic flow predictions. Calculations are based on a commonly used solution procedure for velocity and pressure which uses the SIMPLE algorithm of Patankar and Spalding. Hybrid first-order upwind/central differencing is used, and calculated flow velocities are obtained which agree with both published data and analytical predictions. The corresponding transport equation for the dispersed (particle) phase is solved similarly, and the predicted efficiency curve and distributions of particle concentration are shown. Finally, predicted velocity and particle distributions are compared with corresponding results based on quadratic upstream differencing of the governing equations; it is concluded that numerical diffusion on has little effect on the predicted fluid or particle movement in this case.

[1]  M. P. Escudier,et al.  Observations and LDA measurements of confined turbulent vortex flow , 1980, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  B. Launder,et al.  Mathematical Models of turbulence , 1972 .

[3]  Wolfgang Rodi,et al.  Calculation of Annular and Twin Parallel Jets Using Various Discretization Schemes and Turbulence-Model Variations , 1981 .

[4]  Donald R. Woods,et al.  The velocity distribution within a hydrocyclone operating without an air core , 1973 .

[5]  H AyersW,et al.  THEORETICAL MODELLING OF CYCLONE PERFORMANCE , 1985 .

[6]  B. Launder,et al.  A comparison of hybrid and quadratic-upstream differencing in high Reynolds number elliptic flows , 1981 .

[7]  F. Wattendorf A Study of the Effect of Curvature on Fully Developed Turbulent Flow , 1935 .

[8]  N. Chigier,et al.  Nonisotropic turbulent stress distribution in swirling flows from mean value distributions , 1971 .

[9]  Mayur Patel,et al.  An evaluation of eight discretization schemes for two‐dimensional convection‐diffusion equations , 1986 .

[10]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation , 1990 .

[11]  D. Spalding,et al.  PHOENICS: A General-Purpose Program for Fluid-Flow, Heat-Transfer and Chemical-Reaction Processes , 1983 .

[12]  P. Bradshaw Effects of Streamline Curvature on Turbulent Flow. , 1973 .

[13]  Michael A. Leschziner,et al.  Practical evaluation of three finite difference schemes for the computation of steady-state recirculating flows , 1980 .

[14]  Koulis Pericleous,et al.  The hydrocyclone classifier — A numerical approach , 1986 .

[15]  D. Spalding,et al.  A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows , 1972 .

[16]  G. de Vahl Davis,et al.  An evaluation of upwind and central difference approximations by a study of recirculating flow , 1976 .

[17]  S. Patankar Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[18]  Gerry E. Schneider,et al.  NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF PROBLEMS IN INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID FLOW: TREATMENT OF THE VELOCITY-PRESSURE COUPLING , 1979 .

[19]  Brian Launder,et al.  Prediction of Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer in Swirling, Turbulent Boundary Layers , 1974 .