AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF A LABYRINTH

AUTHOR Anderson, Richard C.; And Others TITLE The Reading Group: An Experimental Investigation of a Labyrinth. Technical Report No. 271. INSTITUTION Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc., Cambridge, Mass.; Illinois Univ., Urbana. Center for the Study of Reading. SPONS AGENCY National Inst. of Education (ED), Washington, DC. PUB DATE Feb 83 CONTRACT 400-76-0116 NOTE 96p. PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143)

[1]  P. David Pearson,et al.  An Instructional Study: Improving the Inferential Comprehension of Good and Poor Fourth-Grade Readers. , 1983 .

[2]  J. Mason,et al.  When do children begin "reading to learn"? : a survey of classroom reading instruction practices in grades two through five , 1982 .

[3]  Thomas L. Good,et al.  The Classroom Ratio of High- and Low-aptitude Students and Its Effect on Achievement , 1981 .

[4]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Teaching the process of reading comprehension , 1980 .

[5]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[6]  R. Allington.  Teacher interruption behaviors during primary-grade oral reading. , 1980 .

[7]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  THE TROUBLE WITH LEVELS: A REEXAMINATION OF CRAIK AND LOCKHART'S FRAMEWORK FOR MEMORY RESEARCH , 1978 .

[8]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Depth of Processing and Interference Effects in the Learning and Remembering of Sentences. Technical Report No. 21. , 1977 .

[9]  Diane L. Schallert,et al.  Improving Memory for Prose: The Relationship between Depth of Processing and Context. Technical Report No. 5. , 1975 .

[10]  F. Craik,et al.  The role of rehearsal in short-term memory , 1973 .

[11]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[12]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Imagery and sentence learning. , 1971 .

[13]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Meaningful processing of sentences. , 1971 .

[14]  T. S. Hyde,et al.  Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. , 1969 .

[15]  E H Cooper,et al.  The total-time hypothesis in verbal learning. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Jeanne Sternlicht Chall,et al.  Learning to Read: The Great Debate , 1967 .

[17]  A D Baddeley,et al.  Short-term Memory for Word Sequences as a Function of Acoustic, Semantic and Formal Similarity , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  John R. Bormuth,et al.  READABILITY--A NEW APPROACH. , 1966 .

[19]  Elfrieda H. Hiebert,et al.  An Examination of Ability Grouping for Reading Instruction. , 1983 .

[20]  Richard C. Anderson.  Allocation of Attention during Reading. , 1982 .

[21]  Roland G. Tharp,et al.  The Effective Instruction of Comprehension: Results and Description of the Kamehameha Early Education Program. , 1982 .

[22]  B. Ross.  The more, the better?: Number of decisions as a determinant of memorability , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Jana M. Mason,et al.  Social organizational factors in learning to read: The balance of rights hypothesis* , 1981 .

[24]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Coding and Comprehension in Skilled Reading and Implications for Reading Instruction. , 1977 .

[25]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Discourse Comprehension and Sources of Individual Differences. , 1977 .