Radiographic outcomes of intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with the trochanteric fixation nail.

BACKGROUND Intertrochanteric hip fractures have become more common as the elderly population continues to increase, and surgical stabilisation of these fractures remains a persistent challenge. The purpose of this study was to analyse the ability of a new helical blade device to stabilise intertrochanteric hip fractures, and to further determine which factors are important in implant stability. METHODS Two hundred and fifty-five patients with an intertrochanteric hip fracture were treated with a trochanteric fixation nail (TFN), 97 of whom fit strict radiographic and follow-up criteria and were included in the study group. After adjusting for magnification and rotation, blade migration within the femoral head and telescoping of the blade along its axis were measured using a custom-designed grid system. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine which variables predicted blade migration and telescoping. RESULTS Fifty-nine fractures were classified as stable, and the remaining 38 were unstable. Mean telescoping was 4.3 mm in the unstable group, compared to 2.6 mm in the stable group (p<0.05). Blade migration within the femoral head averaged 2.2 mm overall, with no difference between stable and unstable fractures. For both telescoping and blade migration, no significant change occurred after the 6-week time point in the stable or unstable group. Nail length, age, and gender did not have a significant effect on either blade migration or telescoping implant position change. Of the initial cohort of 255 patients, five cutouts and one nonunion occurred, three of which required subsequent procedures. CONCLUSIONS Subtle migration ( approximately 2mm) of the tip of the blade within the femoral head occurred in all fractures, but this did not preclude maintenance of reduction and fracture healing, and was not predicted by fracture type, reduction quality, age, or gender. More telescoping occurred in unstable compared to stable fractures, but this averaged 4mm and did not affect stable fixation or fracture healing. All position changes occurred within the first 6 weeks postoperatively, with no subsequent detectable migration or telescoping. Clinical correlations will be needed in the future to determine the significance of small amounts of migration or differences in telescoping, but this device appears to provide effective fixation in both stable and unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures.

[1]  M. Parker.  Cutting-out of the dynamic hip screw related to its position. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  S. Vowler,et al.  Prediction of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation. , 2004, Injury.

[3]  C. Court-Brown,et al.  Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of an Intramedullary Nail Versus Dynamic Screw and Plate for Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[4]  A. Alho,et al.  Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw. , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[5]  J. Mast,et al.  The use of endosteal substitution in the treatment of recalcitrant nonunions of the femur: report of seven cases. , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[6]  K. Harrington,et al.  The management of comminuted unstable intertrochanteric fractures. , 1973, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  P. Rommens,et al.  [Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures]. , 2005, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.

[8]  M. Parker,et al.  Gamma versus DHS nailing for extracapsular femoral fractures , 1996, International Orthopaedics.

[9]  M. F. Parry,et al.  A Retrospective Analysis , 1990 .

[10]  P. Rommens,et al.  Osteosynthese von Oberarmkopffrakturen , 2005, Der Chirurg.

[11]  M. Gardner,et al.  Treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures with the AO trochanteric fixation nail. , 2005, Orthopedics.

[12]  E. Tøndevold,et al.  Unstable trochanteric fractures treated with the sliding screw-plate system. A biomechanical study of unstable trochanteric fractures. III. , 1978, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[13]  A Horsman,et al.  Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  M. Baumgaertner,et al.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  P. Rommens,et al.  Locked plate fixation and intramedullary nailing for proximal humerus fractures: a biomechanical evaluation. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  L. Latta,et al.  Sliding Characteristics of Compression Hip Screws in the Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Clinical Study , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[17]  M. Bottlang,et al.  A Laboratory Model to Evaluate Cutout Resistance of Implants for Pertrochanteric Fracture Fixation , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[18]  Keita Ito,et al.  Improved Intramedullary Nail Interlocking in Osteoporotic Bone , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[19]  Y. Hirasawa,et al.  Migration of the Lag Screw Within the Femoral Head: A Comparison of the Intramedullary Hip Screw and the Gamma Asia-Pacific Nail , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[20]  W. Grechenig,et al.  The proximal femoral nail (PFN) - a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: A prospective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15 months , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[21]  S. Larsson,et al.  Trochanteric fractures. Mobility, complications, and mortality in 607 cases treated with the sliding-screw technique. , 1990, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[22]  E. Tøndevold,et al.  Stable trochanteric fractures. A comparative analysis of four methods of internal fixation. , 1980 .

[23]  W. Werner-Tutschku,et al.  Intra- und perioperative Komplikationen bei der Stabilisierung von per- und subtrochantären Femurfrakturen mittels PFN® , 2002, Der Unfallchirurg.

[24]  T. Sullivan,et al.  The intertrochanteric hip fracture. A retrospective analysis. , 1988, Orthopedics.

[25]  M. Baumgaertner,et al.  The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  M. Eckert,et al.  [A comparative study of unstable per- and intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with dynamic hip screw (DHS) and trochanteric butt-press plate vs. proximal femoral nail (PFN)]. , 2005, Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie.

[27]  M. Tyllianakis,et al.  Treatment of extracapsular hip fractures with the proximal femoral nail (PFN): long term results in 45 patients. , 2004, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[28]  Wolf Gl,et al.  Treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur using sliding screw plate fixation. , 1982, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  P. Goldhagen,et al.  A prospective comparative study of the compression hip screw and the gamma nail , 1993 .

[30]  J. Webb,et al.  A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[31]  J. Bendo,et al.  Collapse of intertrochanteric hip fractures fixed with sliding screws. , 1994, Orthopaedic review.