COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COLOADING AND PRELOADING WITH BALANCED CRYSTALLOIDS FOR PREVENTION OF POST-SPINAL HYPOTENSION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE CAESAREAN SECTION

Background Spinal anesthesia is the most common anaesthetic technique for cesarean delivery due to its rapid onset, a dense neural block, little risk of local anesthetic toxicity and minimal transfer of drug to the fetus, as well as little risk of failure of block However incidence of hypotension is one of disadvantages of this technique because of sympathetic blockade. Conventionally, crystalloid preloading has been used to prevent spinal anaesthesia induced hypotension, but it has shown varying results. Therefore, focus is on crystalloid coloading for prevention of spinal induced hypotension. Method An observational prospective study was done on 60 parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Patients were randomized into 2 groups who received either crystalloid preloading or coloading. Parameters assessed were, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, incidence of hypotension and use of mephentermine. Result In this study, there was significant difference in the incidence of hypotension in both the groups, which was more in preload group. Total dose of mephentermine used was also significantly more in preload group. Conclusion We concluded that crystalloid coloading is beneficial to prevent post-spinal hypotension in patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery, as compared to patients receiving preloading fluid.

[1]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Preload or coload for spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis , 2011, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[2]  M. Columb,et al.  The Effects of Crystalloid and Colloid Preload on Cardiac Output in the Parturient Undergoing Planned Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  A. Baraka,et al.  A Randomized Trial Comparing Colloid Preload to Coload During Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  A. Sia,et al.  Colloid Preload Versus Coload for Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: The Effects on Maternal Cardiac Output , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[5]  J. Arens,et al.  Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia* , 2007, Anesthesiology.

[6]  P Middleton,et al.  Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  R. Dyer,et al.  Crystalloid Preload versus Rapid Crystalloid Administration after Induction of Spinal Anaesthesia (Coload) for Elective Caesarean Section , 2004, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[8]  R. Hahn,et al.  Volume kinetics of Ringer's solution during induction of spinal and general anaesthesia. , 2001, British journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  S. Halpern,et al.  The Effects of an Increase of Central Blood Volume Before Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Qualitative Systematic Review , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  A. Bader,et al.  The Effects of Varying Volumes of Crystalloid Administration Before Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Hemodynamics and Colloid Osmotic Pressure , 1996, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[11]  R. Jackson,et al.  Volume preloading is not essential to prevent spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean section. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[12]  P A Hall,et al.  Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: comparison of infusions of phenylephrine and ephedrine. , 1994, British journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  K. Bhargava,et al.  A study of factors concerned in emesis during spinal anaesthesia. , 1972, British journal of anaesthesia.

[14]  S. Wollman,et al.  Acute hydration for prevention of hypotension of spinal anesthesia in parturients. , 1968, Anesthesiology.