Transforming audit technologies: Business risk audit methodologies and the audit field

Abstract Business Risk Audit (BRA) methodologies have been promoted by a number of the large audit firms in response, they claim, to the challenges of the information age and corporate clients’ needs for assurance. This paper subjects their claim to critical scrutiny, drawing on the perspectives of neo-institutional theories of legitimacy, the sociology of professional knowledge and the sociology of science and technology. To bring into play new Business Risk Audit methodologies a number of the larger firms have sought, through their auditing practice, to renegotiate the bases of their professional identity and status within audit firms and to widen their jurisdictional claims over other areas of expertise. These moves have been accompanied by the legitimation and embedding of Business Risk Audit in revised constructions of the market for audit, in abstract academic knowledges, reforms of professional education, and professional regulations. In providing a constructivist account of Business Risk Audit technologies, we argue for a theory of audit change that recognises (i) the centrality of legitimation processes and (ii) the co-construction of audit technology and the audit field.

[1]  D. Owen,et al.  Debating the ‘Power’ of Audit , 2000 .

[2]  Michael W. Mehaffy,et al.  At Home In The Universe The Search For The Laws Of Self Organization And Complexity , 1996 .

[3]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. , 1991 .

[4]  Stephen A. Zeff,et al.  How the U.S. Accounting Profession Got Where It Is Today: Part II , 2003 .

[5]  Dan A. Simunic,et al.  Auditing, Consulting, And Auditor Independence , 1984 .

[6]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Change as an Underlying Theme in Professional Service Organizations: An Introduction , 1996 .

[7]  M. Power.  The audit implosion: regulating risk from the inside , 2000 .

[8]  K. Peasnell,et al.  Financial Reporting of Risk: Proposals for a Statement of Business Risk , 1997 .

[9]  Christopher Grey,et al.  `Work Hard, Play Hard': An Analysis of Organizational Cliche in Two Accountancy Practices , 1998 .

[10]  M. Lounsbury.  INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION AND STATUS MOBILITY: THE PROFESSIONALIZATION OF THE FIELD OF FINANCE , 2002 .

[11]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[12]  N. Fairclough.  Discourse and social change , 1992 .

[13]  Eliot Freidson,et al.  Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge , 1986 .

[14]  Jeffrey J. McMillan,et al.  Financial Statement Transparency and Auditor Responsibility: Enron and Andersen , 2002 .

[15]  K. V. Peursem,et al.  Current Issues in Auditing (3rd ed.) , 1998 .

[16]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  Sources of Durability and Change in Market Classifications: A Study of the Reconstitution of Product Categories in the American Mutual Fund Industry, 1944-1985 , 2004 .

[17]  Paul M. Hirsch,et al.  Review Essay , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  The Global Management of Professional Services: The Example of Accounting , 1999 .

[19]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems Theory , 1991 .

[20]  Larry E. Rittenberg,et al.  Jurisdictional disputes over professional work: the institutionalization of the global knowledge expert☆ , 2003 .

[21]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[22]  Vivien Beattie,et al.  Behind Closed Doors: What Company Audit is Really About , 2001 .

[23]  Christopher Grey,et al.  On being a professional in a "Big Six" firm , 1998 .

[24]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  Sampling and the abstraction of knowledge in the auditing profession: An extended institutional theory perspective , 1993 .

[25]  M. Reed,et al.  Expert Power and Control in Late Modernity: An Empirical Review and Theoretical Synthesis , 1996 .

[26]  C. Wootton,et al.  Auditor concentration and competition among the large public accounting firms: Post-merger status and future implications , 1991 .

[27]  Susan Squires,et al.  Inside Arthur Andersen: Shifting Values, Unexpected Consequences , 2003 .

[28]  P. Hirsch.  Processing Fads and Fashions: An Organization-Set Analysis of Cultural Industry Systems , 1972, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[30]  Charles Perrow,et al.  Overboard with Myth and Symbols , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  Janine Nahapiet,et al.  The roles of accounting in organizations and society , 1980 .

[32]  B. Latour.  We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[33]  M. J. Fischer,et al.  "Real-izing" the benefits of new technologies as a source of audit evidence: An interpretive field study , 1996 .

[34]  B. Winograd,et al.  Audit Practices of PricewaterhouseCoopers , 2000 .

[35]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Language and Power , 2009 .

[36]  Emer Curtis,et al.  The business risk audit – A longitudinal case study of an audit engagement , 2007 .

[37]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  Informal communications, nonformal communications and mentoring in public accounting firms , 1985 .

[38]  W. Robert Knechel,et al.  Auditing: Assurance and Risk , 2000 .

[39]  P. Wallage,et al.  Application of the Business Risk Audit Model: A Field Study , 2001 .

[40]  Stuart Burchell,et al.  Accounting in its social context: Towards a history of value added in the United Kingdom , 1985 .

[41]  Mahmoud Ezzamel,et al.  Some Empirical Evidence from Publicly Quoted UK Companies on the Relationship Between the Pricing of Audit and Non-audit Services , 1996 .

[42]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[43]  Brian Ballou,et al.  The Impact of Strategic‐Positioning Information on Auditor Judgments about Business‐Process Performance , 2004 .

[44]  M. Power.  The audit society : rituals of verification , 1999 .

[45]  Michael Sherer,et al.  The value of corporate accounting reports: Arguments for a political economy of accounting ☆ , 1984 .

[46]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  The Social Construction of Organizational Knowledge: A Study of the Uses of Coercive, Mimetic, and Normative Isomorphism , 1999 .

[47]  Eliot Freidson,et al.  Professional Dominance: The Social Structure of Medical Care , 1971 .

[48]  Stafford Beer,et al.  Decision and Control: The Meaning of Operational Research and Management Cybernetics , 1966 .

[49]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Organizational socialization: Making sense of the past and present as a prologue for the future. , 1997 .

[50]  David N. Ricchiute,et al.  Audit effort, audit fees, and the provision of nonaudit services to audit clients , 1993 .

[51]  J. Richardson.  Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education , 1986 .

[52]  A. Coffey,et al.  `Timing is Everything'; Graduate Accountants, Time and Organizational Commitment , 1994 .

[53]  M. Lounsbury,et al.  Ending the Family Quarrel , 1997 .

[54]  Fifty years of statistical auditing , 1986 .

[55]  Mladick Ra.  The big six. Six important tips for a better result in lipoplasty. , 1989 .

[56]  A. Rashad Abdel-Khalik,et al.  The Jointness of Audit Fees and Demand for MAS: A Self-Selection Analysis , 1990 .

[57]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution , 1997 .

[58]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[59]  Marilyn Strathern,et al.  Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy , 2000 .

[60]  M. Power.  The Audit Explosion , 1994 .

[61]  Y. Dezalay.  Territorial Battles and Tribal Disputes , 1991 .

[62]  John A. Brierley,et al.  Human Resource Management Issues in Accounting and Auditing Firms: A Research Perspective , 2001 .

[63]  Michael Lounsbury,et al.  Social Structure and Organizations Revisited , 2002 .

[64]  Ed O'Donnell,et al.  The Halo Effect in Business Risk Audits: Can Strategic Risk Assessment Bias Auditor Judgment about Accounting Details? , 2005 .

[65]  James W. DeLoach,et al.  Enterprise-wide risk management : strategies for linking risk and opportunity , 2000 .

[66]  Gerard Hanlon,et al.  The Commercialisation of Accountancy: Flexible Accumulation and the Transformation of the Service Class , 1994 .

[67]  Peter Moizer,et al.  Changes In the Uk Market For Audit Services: 1972-1982 , 1989 .

[68]  S. Kauffman.  At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity , 1995 .

[69]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Will auditors take over the world? Program, technique and the verification of everything , 2000 .

[70]  F. Anderson-Gough,et al.  In the Name of the Client: The Service Ethic in Two Professional Services Firms , 2000 .

[71]  S. R. Jammalamadaka,et al.  Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk , 1999 .

[72]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Transnational Regulation of Professional Services: Governance Dynamics of Field Level Organizational Change , 2007 .

[73]  Robert Freeland,et al.  Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives on Corporate Organization , 1995 .

[74]  David Brain.  Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge.By Eliot Freidson. University of Chicago Press. 241 pp. $20.00 , 1988 .

[75]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  The Calculated and the Avowed: Techniques of Discipline and Struggles over Identity in Big Six Public Accounting Firms , 1998 .

[76]  Marston Morse,et al.  Science in the Modern World , 1955, Nature.

[77]  Michael Power,et al.  Auditing, Expertise and the Sociology of Technique , 1995 .

[78]  M. Power.  FROM COMMON SENSE TO EXPERTISE: REFLECTIONS ON THE PREHISTORY OF AUDIT SAMPLING. , 1992 .

[79]  Christopher K. M. Pong.  Auditor Concentration: A Replication and Extension for the UK Audit Market 1991–1995 , 1999 .

[80]  Michael Power,et al.  Auditing and the production of legitimacy , 2003 .

[81]  Zoe-Vonna Palmrose,et al.  The Effect of Nonaudit Services on the Pricing of Audit Services , 1986 .

[82]  B. Berg.  Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[83]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[84]  G. Vinten.  Audit Expectation‐Performance Gap in the United Kingdom in 1999 and Comparison with the Gap in New Zealand in 1989 and in 1999 , 2005 .

[85]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[86]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Review of: Berg, Bruce L. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 6th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2007 , 2008, Inf. Res..

[87]  Y. Dezalay,et al.  Professional competition and professional power : lawyers, accountants and the social construction of markets. , 1995 .

[88]  H. Bernard,et al.  Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology , 2000 .

[89]  James A. Davis,et al.  Research Methods in Social Relations , 1952 .

[90]  Ira Solomon,et al.  Cases in strategic-systems auditing : KPMG and University of Illinois at Urbana-champaign, business measurement case development and research program , 2002 .

[91]  Linda DeAngelo,et al.  Auditor independence, ‘low balling’, and disclosure regulation , 1981 .

[92]  R. Elliott,et al.  The Future of Audits , 1994 .

[93]  Michèle A. Bowring,et al.  De/Constructing Theory , 2000 .

[94]  C. Grey.  Career as a Project of the Self and Labour Process Discipline , 1994 .

[95]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[96]  K. Jeppesen.  Reinventing auditing, redefining consulting and independence , 1998 .

[97]  S. Shapin,et al.  Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life , 1987 .

[98]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  Structure and agency in an institutionalized setting: The application and social transformation of control in the Big Six☆ , 1997 .

[99]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[100]  H. Willmott,et al.  The power of "independence": defending and extending the jurisdiction of accounting in the United Kingdom , 1995 .

[101]  C. Humphrey,et al.  The audit expectations gap—plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose? , 1992 .

[102]  Howard S. Becker,et al.  Boys In White , 1961 .

[103]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional conditions for diffusion , 1993 .

[104]  A. Abbott.  The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor , 1988 .

[105]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[106]  B. Latour.  Science in Action , 1987 .

[107]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[108]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[109]  Eric Abrahamson,et al.  Management Fashion: Lifecycles, Triggers, and Collective Learning Processes , 1999 .

[110]  Michael W. Macy,et al.  In Search of Excellence: Fads, Success Stories, and Adaptive Emulation1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[111]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[112]  W. Morley Lemon,et al.  Developments in the Audit Methodologies of Large Accounting Firms , 2000 .

[113]  Brian Ballou,et al.  Československá Obchodní Banka, a.s.: Applying Business Risk Audit Techniques in an Emerging Market Economy , 2002 .

[114]  C. Humphrey,et al.  From techniques to ideologies: An alternative perspective on the audit function , 1990 .

[115]  S. Shapin.  HERE AND EVERYWHERE: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge , 1995 .

[116]  Wayne R. Landsman,et al.  Auditors' Perceived Business Risk and Audit Fees: Analysis and Evidence , 2001 .