The Role of Typeface in Packaging Design

[1]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  Humanizing Products with Handwritten Typefaces , 2018 .

[2]  Carlos Velasco,et al.  Symmetry and its role in the crossmodal correspondence between shape and taste , 2018, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[3]  C. Spence,et al.  The role of typeface curvilinearity on taste expectations and perception , 2017 .

[4]  Ya-Hsien Ko The effects of luminance contrast, colour combinations, font, and search time on brand icon legibility. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  David M. Hardesty,et al.  Price Font Disfluency: Anchoring Effects on Future Price Expectations , 2017 .

[6]  Jiang Wu,et al.  Online Customer Reviews and Consumer Evaluation: The Role of Review Font , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[7]  T. Okuhara,et al.  Designing persuasive health materials using processing fluency: a literature review , 2017, BMC Research Notes.

[8]  Kokil Jain,et al.  Role of Color and Typography in Determining Brand Personality , 2017 .

[9]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  The taste of typefaces in different countries and languages. , 2017 .

[10]  Jiao Zhang,et al.  The Contingent Nature of the Symbolic Associations of Visual Design Elements: The Case of Brand Logo Frames , 2016 .

[11]  Pei Liang,et al.  Invariant effect of vision on taste across two Asian cultures: India and China , 2016 .

[12]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Crossmodal correspondences between taste and shape, and their implications for product packaging: A review , 2016 .

[13]  Jessica Y. Y. Kwong,et al.  Illusion of variety: Lower readability enhances perceived variety , 2016 .

[14]  U. Orth,et al.  Healthy by design, but only when in focus: Communicating non-verbal health cues through symbolic meaning in packaging , 2016 .

[15]  Bianca Grohmann Communicating brand gender through type fonts , 2016 .

[16]  P. Walker Cross-sensory correspondences and symbolism in spoken and written language. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Pierrick Gomez,et al.  The pitfall of nutrition facts label fluency: easier-to-process nutrition information enhances purchase intentions for unhealthy food products , 2015, Marketing Letters.

[18]  Deniz Başkent,et al.  Normal-Hearing Listeners’ and Cochlear Implant Users’ Perception of Pitch Cues in Emotional Speech , 2015, i-Perception.

[19]  Carlos Velasco,et al.  The Taste of Typeface , 2015, i-Perception.

[20]  Juan Sebastian Olier,et al.  Love for logos: Evaluating the congruency between brand symbols and typefaces and their relation to emotional words , 2014 .

[21]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  The fluent online shopping experience , 2014 .

[22]  Matthew S. Jarman,et al.  Attractive chameleons sell: The mimicry-attractiveness link , 2014 .

[23]  Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos,et al.  Predictive packaging design: Tasting shapes, typefaces, names, and sounds , 2014 .

[24]  Adam L. Alter The Benefits of Cognitive Disfluency , 2013 .

[25]  Ian D. Parkman,et al.  Using type font characteristics to communicate brand personality of new brands , 2013 .

[26]  C. Spence,et al.  “Bouba” and “Kiki” in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape–sound matches, but different shape–taste matches to Westerners , 2013, Cognition.

[27]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  Visual aesthetics and human preference. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[28]  Wen-Yuan Lee,et al.  The affective feelings of colored typefaces , 2012 .

[29]  R. K. Guenther,et al.  Does the Processing Fluency of a Syllabus Affect the Forecasted Grade and Course Difficulty? , 2012, Psychological reports.

[30]  Rik Pieters,et al.  Consumer Evaluation of Copycat Brands: The Effect of Imitation Type , 2012 .

[31]  Rik Pieters,et al.  When High-Similarity Copycats Lose and Moderate-Similarity Copycats Gain: The Impact of Comparative Evaluation , 2012 .

[32]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Letter processing and font information during reading: Beyond distinctiveness, where vision meets design , 2011, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[33]  A. Pruyn,et al.  When Visual Product Features Speak the Same Language: Effects of Shape-Typeface Congruence on Brand Perception and Price Expectations* , 2011 .

[34]  J. Doyle,et al.  Mixed Messages in Brand Names: Separating the Impacts of Letter Shape from Sound Symbolism , 2011 .

[35]  Rico Fischer,et al.  If it’s hard to read… try harder! Processing fluency as signal for effort adjustments , 2011, Psychological research.

[36]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Making Products Feel Special: When Metacognitive Difficulty Enhances Evaluation , 2010 .

[37]  Giuseppe Iaria,et al.  Reading words, seeing style: The neuropsychology of word, font and handwriting perception , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  J. Doyle,et al.  Norms for Osgood’s affective meaning (Evaluation, Potency, Activity): Ratings of Logos, Colors, Products and Services, Names, and Typefaces , 2010 .

[39]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  J. Henrich,et al.  Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[41]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  If it,s easy to read, it,s easy to do, pretty, good, and true , 2010 .

[42]  Mary Alton Mackey,et al.  Ease of reading of mandatory information on Canadian food product labels , 2009 .

[43]  J. Doyle,et al.  The massage in the medium: Transfer of connotative meaning from typeface to names and products , 2009 .

[44]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  If It's Difficult to Pronounce, It Must Be Risky , 2009, Psychological science.

[45]  P. Walker,et al.  Font tuning: A review and new experimental evidence , 2008 .

[46]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  If It's Hard to Read, It's Hard to Do , 2008, Psychological science.

[47]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Of Frog Wines and Frowning Watches: Semantic Priming, Perceptual Fluency, and Brand Evaluation , 2008 .

[48]  S. Juni,et al.  Emotional and Persuasive Perception of Fonts , 2008, Perceptual and motor skills.

[49]  M. Bar,et al.  Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects , 2006, Psychological science.

[50]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Investigation into font characteristics for optimum reading fluency in readers with sight problems , 2005 .

[51]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[52]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Impression Management using Typeface Design , 2004 .

[53]  J. Doyle,et al.  Font appropriateness and brand choice , 2004 .

[54]  Stephen M. Colarelli,et al.  Intuitive evolutionary perspectives in marketing practices1 , 2003 .

[55]  E. Brumberger,et al.  The Rhetoric of Typography: The Persona of Typeface and Text , 2003 .

[56]  David L. Mothersbaugh,et al.  Effects of typographic factors in advertising‐based persuasion: A general model and initial empirical tests , 2002 .

[57]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  John E. Gump The Readability of Typefaces and the Subsequent Mood or Emotion Created in the Reader , 2001 .

[59]  Krzysztof Lenk,et al.  Design: principles of typography for user interface design , 1998, INTR.

[60]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments , 1998 .

[61]  Richard E. Mathisen,et al.  Quantifying perceived differences in type styles: An exploratory study , 1995 .

[62]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Communicability of the emotional connotation of type , 1986 .

[63]  C. B. Colby The weirdest people in the world , 1973 .

[64]  I. Child,et al.  Emotional meaning of four typographical variables. , 1968, The Journal of applied psychology.

[65]  Percy H. Tannenbaum,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Typeface Connotations , 1964 .

[66]  Cyril Burt,et al.  A Psychological Study of Typography , 1959 .

[67]  G. Schiller An experimental study of the appropriateness of color and type in advertising. , 1935 .

[68]  A. T. Poffenberger,et al.  The Feeling Value of Lines. , 1924 .

[69]  J. Wagemans The Oxford handbook of perceptual organization , 2015 .

[70]  Frank Yiannas Font Style & Food Safety , 2015 .

[71]  Franck Celhay,et al.  Food packages and communication through typeface design: The exoticism of exotypes , 2015 .

[72]  C. Spence Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism , 2012 .

[73]  T. Sanocki Perception : Font-Specific , Schematic Tuning , 2011 .

[74]  Simon Garfield,et al.  Just My Type: A Book About Fonts , 2010 .

[75]  John R. Doyle,et al.  Dressed for the Occasion: Font-Product Congruity in the Perception of Logotype , 2006 .

[76]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment , 2003 .

[77]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  All Dressed Up With Something to Say: Effects of Typeface Semantic Associations on Brand Perceptions and Consumer Memory , 2002 .

[78]  Thomas Hine,et al.  The total package : the secret history and hidden meanings of boxes, bottles, cans, and other persuasive containers , 1997 .

[79]  Jeffrey F. Durgee,et al.  Perceiving What Package Designs Express: A Multisensory Exploratory Study Using Creative Writing Measurement Techniques , 1996 .

[80]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Language and Brand Attitudes: Impact of Script and Sound Matching in Chinese and English , 1996 .

[81]  Robert Bringhurst,et al.  The Elements of Typographic Style , 1992 .

[82]  Camille L. Rowe The connotative dimensions of selected display typefaces , 1982 .

[83]  R. Davis,et al.  Determinants of feeling tone in type faces. , 1933 .

[84]  A. T. Poffenberger,et al.  A study of the appropriateness of type faces. , 1923 .

[85]  H. Lundholm,et al.  The Affective Tone of Lines: Experimental Researches. , 1921 .