Biasing the Perception of Spoken Words with Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

Recent neuroimaging evidence suggests that the frequency of entrained oscillations in auditory cortices influences the perceived duration of speech segments, impacting word perception [Kösem, A., Bosker, H. R., Takashima, A., Meyer, A., Jensen, O., & Hagoort, P. Neural entrainment determines the words we hear. Current Biology, 28, 2867–2875, 2018]. We further tested the causal influence of neural entrainment frequency during speech processing, by manipulating entrainment with continuous transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) at distinct oscillatory frequencies (3 and 5.5 Hz) above the auditory cortices. Dutch participants listened to speech and were asked to report their percept of a target Dutch word, which contained a vowel with an ambiguous duration. Target words were presented either in isolation (first experiment) or at the end of spoken sentences (second experiment). We predicted that the tACS frequency would influence neural entrainment and therewith how speech is perceptually sampled, leading to a perceptual overestimation or underestimation of the vowel's duration. Whereas results from Experiment 1 did not confirm this prediction, results from Experiment 2 suggested a small effect of tACS frequency on target word perception: Faster tACS leads to more long-vowel word percepts, in line with the previous neuroimaging findings. Importantly, the difference in word perception induced by the different tACS frequencies was significantly larger in Experiment 1 versus Experiment 2, suggesting that the impact of tACS is dependent on the sensory context. tACS may have a stronger effect on spoken word perception when the words are presented in continuous speech as compared to when they are isolated, potentially because prior (stimulus-induced) entrainment of brain oscillations might be a prerequisite for tACS to be effective.

[1]  Christoph Braun,et al.  Mapping entrained brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2016, NeuroImage.

[2]  A. Todorović,et al.  Repetition Suppression and Expectation Suppression Are Dissociable in Time in Early Auditory Evoked Fields , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Bettina Sorger,et al.  Neural Entrainment to Speech Modulates Speech Intelligibility , 2017, Current Biology.

[4]  Edmund C. Lalor,et al.  Low-Frequency Cortical Entrainment to Speech Reflects Phoneme-Level Processing , 2015, Current Biology.

[5]  Jonathan Z. Simon,et al.  Adaptive Temporal Encoding Leads to a Background-Insensitive Cortical Representation of Speech , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Jonas Obleser,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation with speech envelopes modulates speech comprehension , 2018, NeuroImage.

[7]  Matthias J. Sjerps,et al.  Cognitive load makes speech sound fast, but does not modulate acoustic context effects , 2017 .

[8]  Katharina S. Rufener,et al.  Modulating Human Auditory Processing by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation , 2016, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[9]  C. Kayser,et al.  Neural Entrainment and Attentional Selection in the Listening Brain , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Lars Riecke,et al.  Stimulus Presentation at Specific Neuronal Oscillatory Phases Experimentally Controlled with tACS: Implementation and Applications , 2016, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[11]  Oded Ghitza,et al.  Linking Speech Perception and Neurophysiology: Speech Decoding Guided by Cascaded Oscillators Locked to the Input Rhythm , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[12]  Lars Riecke,et al.  Conveying Temporal Information to the Auditory System via Transcranial Current Stimulation , 2018, Acta Acustica united with Acustica.

[13]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Phase Entrainment of Brain Oscillations Causally Modulates Neural Responses to Intelligible Speech , 2018, Current Biology.

[14]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[15]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Cortical Tracking of Hierarchical Linguistic Structures in Connected Speech , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Anne Kösem,et al.  An Entrained Rhythm's Frequency, Not Phase, Influences Temporal Sampling of Speech , 2017, INTERSPEECH.

[17]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[18]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Electrical Stimulation of the Visual Cortex , 2008, Current Biology.

[19]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Knowledge-based and signal-based cues are weighted flexibly during spoken language comprehension. , 2020, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Listeners normalize speech for contextual speech rate even without an explicit recognition task. , 2019, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Preperceptual and Stimulus-Selective Enhancement of Low-Level Human Visual Cortex Excitability by Sounds , 2009, Current Biology.

[22]  Alexander T Sack,et al.  Oscillatory phase shapes syllable perception , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  E Ahissar,et al.  Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  A. Syrota,et al.  The Cortical Representation of Speech , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  P. Brown,et al.  Transcranial Current Stimulation , 2013 .

[26]  D. McCormick,et al.  Endogenous Electric Fields May Guide Neocortical Network Activity , 2010, Neuron.

[27]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Neural Oscillations Carry Speech Rhythm through to Comprehension , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[28]  L. Parra,et al.  Low frequency transcranial electrical stimulation does not entrain sleep rhythms measured by human intracranial recordings , 2017, Nature Communications.

[29]  Oded Ghitza,et al.  Entrained theta oscillations guide perception of subsequent speech: behavioural evidence from rate normalisation , 2018 .

[30]  Ahmad Khatoun,et al.  tACS motor system effects can be caused by transcutaneous stimulation of peripheral nerves , 2019, Nature Communications.

[31]  H. Bergh,et al.  Examples of Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects and with Binomial Data. , 2008 .

[32]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) differentially modulates speech perception in young and older adults , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[33]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Alexandre Gramfort,et al.  Encoding of event timing in the phase of neural oscillations , 2014, NeuroImage.

[35]  B. Hangya,et al.  Phase Entrainment of Human Delta Oscillations Can Mediate the Effects of Expectation on Reaction Speed , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Benedikt Zoefel,et al.  The Involvement of Endogenous Neural Oscillations in the Processing of Rhythmic Input: More Than a Regular Repetition of Evoked Neural Responses , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[37]  Matthew R. Krause,et al.  Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation , 2018, Nature Communications.

[38]  Lars Riecke,et al.  Endogenous Delta/Theta Sound-Brain Phase Entrainment Accelerates the Buildup of Auditory Streaming , 2015, Current Biology.

[39]  P. Schyns,et al.  Entrainment of Perceptually Relevant Brain Oscillations by Non-Invasive Rhythmic Stimulation of the Human Brain , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[40]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[41]  L. Parra,et al.  Low-Intensity Electrical Stimulation Affects Network Dynamics by Modulating Population Rate and Spike Timing , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Joachim Gross,et al.  Phase-Locked Responses to Speech in Human Auditory Cortex are Enhanced During Comprehension , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  David Poeppel,et al.  Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  Atsuko Takashima,et al.  Neural Entrainment Determines the Words We Hear , 2017, Current Biology.

[45]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Transcranial electric stimulation for the investigation of speech perception and comprehension , 2016, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[46]  Carsten H. Wolters,et al.  Good vibrations: Oscillatory phase shapes perception , 2012, NeuroImage.

[47]  Lars Riecke,et al.  4-Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Phase Modulates Hearing , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[48]  Martin Meyer,et al.  40Hz-Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) selectively modulates speech perception. , 2016, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[49]  Praveen K. Pilly,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation entrains single-neuron activity in the primate brain , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Virginie van Wassenhove,et al.  Distinct contributions of low- and high-frequency neural oscillations to speech comprehension , 2017 .

[51]  Jordi Costa-Faidella,et al.  Interactions between “What” and “When” in the Auditory System: Temporal Predictability Enhances Repetition Suppression , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  H. Bosker Accounting for rate-dependent category boundary shifts in speech perception , 2016, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.