Quantitative Structure Determination of Large Three‐Dimensional Nanoparticle Assemblies

Self-assembly of nanoparticles has recently received increasing interest [ 1 ] because it is an attractive route towards systems in which the properties can be tuned using parameters such as the size of the individual particles and the nature of their threedimensional (3D) stacking. However, in order to understand the structure/property relationship, a thorough characterization of the nanoparticle organization is of crucial importance. Although conventional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is a very useful tool to study nanoscale materials, it only provides twodimensional (2D) projection images of a 3D object. Therefore, electron tomography has become a standard technique in the 3D characterization of nanomaterials. In electron tomography, 2D projection images acquired using a TEM are combined into a 3D reconstruction through a mathematical algorithm. Several groups have demonstrated the ability to investigate nanoparticle assemblies by electron tomography. [ 2 , 3 ] In those cases, either bright fi eld TEM (BF-TEM) or high angle annular dark fi eld scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM) was used to obtain the series of 2D images. However, if one wants to extract quantitative information, optimization of the electron tomography experiment is required. This is especially the case for large assemblies that have a thickness > 500 nm. For such systems, the conventional approaches yield different types of artifacts hampering a quantitative interpretation of the 3D data. Here, we propose an improved route towards the quantitative structure determination of large 3D nanoparticle assemblies, which required optimization of both the acquisition technique and the reconstruction algorithm. We demonstrate that this approach is of crucial importance in the investigation of so-called “superspheres”, containing Au nanoparticles stabilized by a polymer matrix. Because they have a large diameter and contain no specifi c features that can hamper a reliable reconstruction, these large assemblies serve as good test objects to investigate the infl uence of both the acquisition technique and the reconstruction algorithm on the quality of the reconstruction. Such systems have also become of high importance in the fi eld of nanoplasmonics because they may lead to controlled hot spot formation and antenna effects. [ 4 ] By changing the size of the

[1]  S J Pennycook,et al.  Z-Contrast Transmission Electron Microscopy: Direct Atomic Imaging of Materials , 1992 .

[2]  D. Muller,et al.  Determining On-Axis Crystal Thickness with Quantitative Position-Averaged Incoherent Bright-Field Signal in an Aberration-Corrected STEM , 2011, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[3]  A. Verkleij,et al.  Quantitative structural analysis of binary nanocrystal superlattices by electron tomography. , 2009, Nano letters.

[4]  Kees Joost Batenburg,et al.  Electron tomography based on a total variation minimization reconstruction technique , 2012 .

[5]  S. Bals,et al.  A New Approach for Electron Tomography: Annular Dark‐Field Transmission Electron Microscopy , 2006 .

[6]  A. Verkleij,et al.  Three-Dimensional Transmission Electron Microscopy: A Novel Imaging and Characterization Technique with Nanometer Scale Resolution for Materials Science , 2000 .

[7]  S Bals,et al.  3D Imaging of Nanomaterials by Discrete Tomography , 2006, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[8]  M. Grzelczak,et al.  Steric hindrance induces crosslike self-assembly of gold nanodumbbells. , 2012, Nano letters.

[9]  M. Weyland Electron Tomography of Catalysts , 2002 .

[10]  S. Bals,et al.  Measuring porosity at the nanoscale by quantitative electron tomography. , 2010, Nano letters.

[11]  D. Donoho For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal 𝓁1‐norm solution is also the sparsest solution , 2006 .

[12]  D. Van Dyck,et al.  Correction of non-linear thickness effects in HAADF STEM electron tomography , 2012 .

[13]  D. Muller,et al.  Three-Dimensional Measurement of Line Edge Roughness in Copper Wires Using Electron Tomography , 2009, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[14]  P. Midgley,et al.  3D electron microscopy in the physical sciences: the development of Z-contrast and EFTEM tomography. , 2003, Ultramicroscopy.

[15]  D. Muller,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging of nanovoids in copper interconnects using incoherent bright field tomography , 2006 .

[16]  Z. Levine Tomography in the multiple scattering regime of the scanning transmission electron microscope , 2003 .

[17]  J. Vermant,et al.  Directed self-assembly of nanoparticles. , 2010, ACS nano.

[18]  Zachary H. Levine,et al.  Theory of bright-field scanning transmission electron microscopy for tomography , 2005 .

[19]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Quantitative Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Catalyst Particles for Bamboo-like Carbon Nanotubes , 2007 .

[20]  L. Liz‐Marzán,et al.  Controlled assembly of plasmonic colloidal nanoparticle clusters. , 2011, Nanoscale.

[21]  P. Midgley,et al.  Electron tomography and holography in materials science. , 2009, Nature materials.

[22]  P. Gilbert Iterative methods for the three-dimensional reconstruction of an object from projections. , 1972, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  J. Silcox,et al.  Simulation of annular dark field stem images using a modified multislice method , 1987 .

[24]  S. Bals,et al.  A practical method to determine the effective resolution in incoherent experimental electron tomography. , 2011, Ultramicroscopy.

[25]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[26]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[27]  P. Midgley,et al.  Three-dimensional morphology of iron oxide nanoparticles with reactive concave surfaces. A compressed sensing-electron tomography (CS-ET) approach. , 2011, Nano letters.

[28]  S Bals,et al.  Exploring different inelastic projection mechanisms for electron tomography. , 2011, Ultramicroscopy.

[29]  J R Kremer,et al.  Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[30]  P. Buseck,et al.  Comparison of intensity distributions in tomograms from BF TEM, ADF STEM, HAADF STEM, and calculated tilt series. , 2005, Ultramicroscopy.

[31]  A. Demortière,et al.  3D quantitative analysis of platinum nanocrystal superlattices by electron tomography. , 2012, ACS nano.