Social Network User Influence Dynamics Prediction

Identifying influential users and predicting their “network impact” on social networks have attracted tremendous interest from both academia and industry. Most of the developed algorithms and tools are mainly dependent on the static network structure instead of the dynamic diffusion process over the network, and are thus essentially based on descriptive models instead of predictive models. In this paper, we propose a dynamic information propagation model based on Continuous-Time Markov Process to predict the influence dynamics of social network users, where the nodes in the propagation sequences are the users, and the edges connect users who refer to the same topic contiguously on time. Our proposed model is compared with two baselines, including a well-known time-series forecasting model – Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average and a widely accepted information diffusion model – Independent cascade. Experimental results validate our ideas and demonstrate the prediction performance of our proposed algorithms.

[1]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Predicting Influential Users in Online Social Networks , 2010, ArXiv.

[2]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[3]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[4]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  How to search a social network , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[5]  Qi He,et al.  TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers , 2010, WSDM '10.

[6]  Yun Chi,et al.  Information flow modeling based on diffusion rate for prediction and ranking , 2007, WWW '07.

[7]  Michael K. Ng,et al.  Mining of Web-Page Visiting Patterns with Continuous-Time Markov Models , 2004, PAKDD.

[8]  Ching-Yung Lin,et al.  Personalized recommendation driven by information flow , 2006, SIGIR.

[9]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[10]  Laks V. S. Lakshmanan,et al.  Learning influence probabilities in social networks , 2010, WSDM '10.

[11]  E. Rogers Diffusion of preventive innovations. , 2002, Addictive behaviors.

[12]  Masahiro Kimura,et al.  Generative Models of Information Diffusion with Asynchronous Timedelay , 2010, ACML.

[13]  Terence C. Mills,et al.  Time series techniques for economists , 1990 .

[14]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing , 2002, KDD.

[15]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.

[16]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[17]  Ari Rappoport,et al.  What's in a hashtag?: content based prediction of the spread of ideas in microblogging communities , 2012, WSDM '12.

[18]  Miles Osborne,et al.  RT to Win! Predicting Message Propagation in Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[19]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  Information diffusion through blogspace , 2004, WWW '04.

[20]  D. Vere-Jones Markov Chains , 1972, Nature.

[21]  W. J. Anderson Continuous-Time Markov Chains , 1991 .

[22]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining the network value of customers , 2001, KDD '01.

[23]  W. J. Anderson Continuous-Time Markov Chains: An Applications-Oriented Approach , 1991 .

[24]  Tie-Yan Liu,et al.  BrowseRank: letting web users vote for page importance , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[25]  Byoung-Tak Zhang,et al.  PRICAI 2010: Trends in Artificial Intelligence, 11th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Daegu, Korea, August 30-September 2, 2010. Proceedings , 2010, PRICAI.

[26]  Masahiro Kimura,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Cumulative Influence for Multiple Activation Information Diffusion Model with Continuous Time Delay , 2010, PRICAI.

[27]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..