A Framework for Task-Based Ambidexterity in Manufacturing SMEs

To be competitive, it is important for companies to create a breeding ground for innovation without jeopardizing productivity. The challenge posed by industrial companies and the innovation research community is how to promote innovation while achieving efficient execution. The ability to balance execution and innovation is referred to as organizational ambidexterity (OA), which includes several dimensions, concepts and approaches where a central task can be identified. The purpose of this paper is to investigate what consequences result from different dimensions of a task in relation to the types of its actions, and their effects on OA. The focus of the task is firstly investigated, followed by the development of nine scenarios via combining the designers’ and the performers’ perspectives of the task. A brief analysis of the scenarios indicates that there is no single optimal scenario; rather, the scenarios represent different states that are appropriate for certain conditions, and dynamic adaptation should be encouraged in relation to the changing conditions. This type of dynamics is particularly expected to prevail in small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) because the roles that are responsible for tasks in these organizations are less specialized. Therefore, SMEs must define tasks that include both explorative and exploitative parts, either simultaneously or sequentially, to stimulate employees to work ambidextrously and thereby develop the concept of task-based ambidexterity.

[1]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Optimal Structure, Market Dynamism, and the Strategy of Simple Rules , 2009 .

[2]  Johan Karltun,et al.  On Stage: Acting for development of businesses and ergonomics in woodworking SMEs , 2009 .

[3]  Zeki Simsek Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a Multilevel Understanding , 2009 .

[4]  Cathrine Hasse,et al.  Employee-Driven Innovation , 2012 .

[5]  P. Garengo,et al.  The development of SME managerial practice for effective performance management , 2013 .

[6]  M. Smith,et al.  Implementing strategically aligned performance measurement in small firms , 2007 .

[7]  Per-Erik Ellström,et al.  Two Logics of Learning , 2005 .

[8]  Annika Engström,et al.  Identifying Scenarios for Ambidextrous Learning in a Decoupling Thinking Context , 2017, APMS.

[9]  Hongyi Chen,et al.  Exploring the impact of lean management on innovation capability , 2009, PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[10]  D. Good,et al.  Individual Ambidexterity: Exploring and Exploiting in Dynamic Contexts , 2013, The Journal of psychology.

[11]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[12]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[13]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future , 2013 .

[14]  Eva Lovén Kreativitet, innovation och lean , 2013 .