CONTEXT
The pocketing effect of helmet padding helps to dissipate forces experienced by the head, but if the player's helmet remains stationary in an opponent's shoulder pads, the compressive force on the cervical spine may increase.
OBJECTIVE
To (1) measure the coefficient of static friction between different football helmet finishes and football jersey fabrics and (2) calculate the potential amount of force on a player's helmet due to the amount of friction present.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional study.
SETTING
Laboratory.
PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS
Helmets with different finishes and different football jersey fabrics.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)
The coefficient of friction was determined for 2 helmet samples (glossy and matte), 3 football jerseys (collegiate, high school, and youth), and 3 types of jersey numbers (silkscreened, sublimated, and stitched on) using the TAPPI T 815 standard method. These measurements determined which helmet-to-helmet, helmet-to-jersey number, and helmet-to-jersey material combination resulted in the least amount of static friction.
RESULTS
The glossy helmet versus glossy helmet combination produced a greater amount of static friction than the other 2 helmet combinations (P = .013). The glossy helmet versus collegiate jersey combination produced a greater amount of static friction than the other helmet-to-jersey material combinations (P < .01). The glossy helmet versus silkscreened numbers combination produced a greater amount of static friction than the other helmet-to-jersey number combinations (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS
The force of static friction experienced during collisions can be clinically relevant. Conditions with higher coefficients of static friction result in greater forces. In this study, the highest coefficient of friction (glossy helmet versus silkscreened number) could increase the forces on the player's helmet by 3553.88 N when compared with other helmet-to-jersey combinations. Our results indicate that the makeup of helmet and uniform materials may affect sport safety.
[1]
M. Palumbo,et al.
Catastrophic Cervical Spine Injuries in the Collision Sport Athlete, Part 1
,
2004,
The American journal of sports medicine.
[2]
Jacqueline Krim,et al.
Surface science and the atomic-scale origins of friction: what once was old is new again
,
2002
.
[3]
Erik E Swartz,et al.
Cervical spine functional anatomy and the biomechanics of injury due to compressive loading.
,
2005,
Journal of athletic training.
[4]
Joseph J Crisco,et al.
An investigation of the NOCSAE linear impactor test method based on in vivo measures of head impact acceleration in American football.
,
2010,
Journal of biomechanical engineering.
[5]
J S Torg,et al.
The epidemiologic, pathologic, biomechanical, and cinematographic analysis of football-induced cervical spine trauma
,
1990,
The American journal of sports medicine.
[6]
P. Ivancic.
Biomechanics of sports-induced axial-compression injuries of the neck.
,
2012,
Journal of athletic training.
[7]
M Cieplak,et al.
Molecular Origins of Friction: The Force on Adsorbed Layers
,
1994,
Science.
[8]
B S Myers,et al.
The influence of surface padding properties on head and neck injury risk.
,
2001,
Journal of biomechanical engineering.
[9]
B S Myers,et al.
Experimental Impact Injury to the Cervical Spine: Relating Motion of the Head and the Mechanism of Injury*
,
1996,
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.