An innovative design approach to develop external articular medical devices

The overwhelming majority of the work involved in the development of external medical devices, as orthoses, consists in applying the companies’ empirical knowledge. However, this non structured method, in some cases, may lead to incomplete, inadequate or low products quality. This fact precludes the patient to use the device for long term and consequently the rehabilitation desired effect promoted by the orthosis is compromised. Based on that, to promote a superior product quality, different knowledge from several domains should be considered and should interact in order to achieve a common goal, during the development stages. Additionally, when the development concerns medical devices, the users’ needs and users’ interface and way to use it gain a major importance. The combination of these different factors is a difficult task and is usually overlooked by the companies. This fact demonstrates the importance of the implementation of a design approach for the development of medical devices, which will permit to plan and structure each stage of the products’ development. According to that, the goal of this study was to develop an innovative design approach for the development of an articulated external medical device (articular orthoses) based on the most significant moments during the device’s usage.

[1]  Elizabeth Murphy,et al.  Medical device development: the challenge for ergonomics. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  Xavier Fischer,et al.  Interactive Design: Then and Now , 2011 .

[3]  Noemi Bitterman,et al.  Design of medical devices--a home perspective. , 2011, European journal of internal medicine.

[4]  Sarah Sharples,et al.  The effect of design on the usability and real world effectiveness of medical devices: a case study with adolescent users. , 2013, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  Dominique Scaravetti,et al.  Innovation through Pertinent Patents Research based on Physical Phenomena Involved , 2014 .

[6]  A. Ammar Adaptation et mise en place d'un processus d'innovation et de conception au sein d'une PME , 2010 .

[7]  Lau Langeveld Product design with embodiment design as a new perspective , 2011 .

[8]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[9]  M Hallbeck,et al.  How to Develop Usable Surgical Devices – The View From a U.S. Research University , 2010 .

[10]  J. F. Martínez-Cadavid,et al.  Implementation of ergonomic aspects throughout the engineering design process: Human-Artefact-Context analysis , 2017 .

[11]  Albert J. Shih,et al.  Process Planning for the Fuse Deposition Modeling of Ankle-Foot-Othoses , 2016 .

[12]  Jonathan Earthy,et al.  The Benefits of Using ISO 13407: Human Centred Design Process for Interactive Systems , 2001, INTERACT.

[13]  Albert J. Shih,et al.  Additive Manufacturing of Custom Orthoses and Prostheses – A Review☆ , 2015 .

[14]  Martin C. Maguire,et al.  Methods to support human-centred design , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  Caterina Rizzi,et al.  A computer-assisted methodology to innovate the development process of prosthesis socket , 2006 .

[16]  Scott J Hollister,et al.  A paradigm for the development and evaluation of novel implant topologies for bone fixation: implant design and fabrication. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Ian McClelland,et al.  Involving people in design , 2005 .

[18]  Jonathan Earthy,et al.  The improvement of human-centred processes-facing the challenge and reaping the benefit of ISO 13407 , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[20]  D. Condie,et al.  The modern era of orthotics , 2008, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[21]  Sarah Sharples,et al.  Medical device design in context: A model of user-device interaction and consequences , 2012, Displays.