Detection of low‐level mosaicism by array CGH in routine diagnostic specimens

The advent of microarray‐based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) promises to revolutionize clinical cytogenetics because of its ability to rapidly screen the genome at an unprecedented resolution. Yet, the ability of array CGH to detect and evaluate low‐level mosaicism is not known. Our laboratory has analyzed over 3,600 clinical cases with the SignatureChip® which we developed for the detection of microdeletions, microduplications, aneuploidy, unbalanced translocations, and subtelomeric and pericentromeric copy number alterations. Here, we report 18 cases of mosaicism detected by array CGH in a routine diagnostic setting, 14 of which were not known to us at the time of the analysis. These 14 cases represent ∼8% of all abnormal cases identified in our laboratory. For each case, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was performed on PHA‐stimulated cultures after mosaic chromosome abnormalities were suspected by array CGH. In all cases, FISH confirmed the mosaic chromosome abnormalities which included a variety of marker chromosomes, autosomal trisomies, terminal and interstitial deletions, and derivative chromosomes. Interestingly, confirmatory FISH analyses on direct blood smears indicated that the percentage of abnormal cells in unstimulated cultures was in some cases different than that found in PHA‐stimulated cells. We also report the detection of a previously unsuspected case of an isochromosome 12p (associated with Pallister–Killian syndrome) by array CGH using genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood. These results support a growing body of data that suggests that stimulated peripheral blood cultures likely distort the percentage of abnormal cells and may, for some chromosome abnormalities, make their detection unlikely by conventional analysis. Thus, array CGH, which is based on genomic DNA extracted directly from uncultured peripheral blood, may be more likely to detect low‐level mosaicism for unbalanced chromosome abnormalities than traditional cytogenetic techniques. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  E. Hook.  Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use. , 1977, American journal of human genetics.

[2]  R. Pagon,et al.  Abnormal skin fibroblast cytogenetics in four dysmorphic patients with normal lymphocyte chromosomes. , 1979, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  P. Wong,et al.  Trisomy 22 Mosaicism with Normal Blood Chromosomes , 1988, La Clinica pediatrica.

[4]  H. Lund,et al.  Trisomy 22 Mosaicism Limited to Skin Fibroblasts in a Mentally Retarded, Dysmorphic Girl , 1990, Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica.

[5]  D. Ledbetter,et al.  Cytogenetic results from the U.S. collaborative study on CVS , 1992, Prenatal diagnosis.

[6]  B. Wang,et al.  Mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling: An analysis of incidence and chromosomes involved in 2612 consecutive cases , 1993, Prenatal diagnosis.

[7]  L. Shaffer,et al.  Molecular characterization of de novo secondary trisomy 13. , 1994, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  J. Graham,et al.  Blaschkolinear skin pigmentary variation due to trisomy 7 mosaicism. , 2000, American journal of medical genetics.

[9]  Seang Lin Tan,et al.  Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in vitro: incidence, type, and relevance to embryo outcome. , 2002, Human reproduction.

[10]  R. Pyeritz,et al.  Human genetics and disease: Mechanisms and consequences of somatic mosaicism in humans , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  D. Flannery,et al.  Unusual mosaic karyotype resulting from adjacent 1 segregation of t(11;22): importance of performing skin fibroblast karyotype in patients with unexplained multiple congenital anomalies. , 2002, American journal of medical genetics.

[12]  J. Veltman,et al.  Definition of a critical region on chromosome 18 for congenital aural atresia by arrayCGH. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  D. Ledbetter,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.

[14]  Bassem A Bejjani,et al.  A cytogeneticist's perspective on genomic microarrays. , 2004, Human reproduction update.

[15]  T. Hassold.  Mosaic trisomies in human spontaneous abortions , 2004, Human Genetics.

[16]  S. Knuutila,et al.  Molecular cytogenetic study of patients with Pallister-Killian syndrome , 1993, Human Genetics.

[17]  X. Estivill,et al.  Small marker chromosomes in two patients with segmental aneusomy for proximal 17p , 2004, Human Genetics.

[18]  L. Shaffer,et al.  A clinical and molecular study of mosaicism for trisomy 17 , 2004, Human Genetics.

[19]  Bassem A Bejjani,et al.  Use of targeted array‐based CGH for the clinical diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance: Is less more? , 2005, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[20]  T. Frebourg,et al.  Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations , 2005, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[21]  L. Shaffer,et al.  Array-based comparative genomic hybridization in clinical diagnosis , 2005, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[22]  L. Shaffer,et al.  Targeted genomic microarray analysis for identification of chromosome abnormalities in 1500 consecutive clinical cases. , 2006, The Journal of pediatrics.

[23]  G Mortier,et al.  Emerging patterns of cryptic chromosomal imbalance in patients with idiopathic mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies: a new series of 140 patients and review of published reports , 2006, Journal of Medical Genetics.