Influence of reduced VAV flow settings on indoor thermal comfort in an office space

The air temperature distribution in a space with reduced diffuser flow rates and heat loads was studied using simulation. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to analyze the room air distribution from a side wall diffuser at the design flow rate, and the results were validated with experimental data. CFD was used to predict occupant discomfort under a range of reduced diffuser flow rates. It was found for diffuser flow rates above 30% of the design flow rate that the temperature influence from the jet was minimal. At these flow rates, there was nearly a uniform temperature distribution in the occupied zone. The predicted maximum value of percentage of dissatisfied occupants within the space began to increase for diffuser flow rates below 30% of the design flow rate. The percent dissatisfaction at 1 m room height was greater than 25% for the lowest diffuser flow rate tested (15% of the design flow rate) directly under the diffuser, which was the highest of the test cases, but was 5% or less throughout more than 90% of the room. In contrast, at the higher flow rates, the percent dissatisfied index was 5% or less in only 60%–80% of the room due to increased velocity. Evidence of dumping was already found at the traditional minimum flow rate setting of 30% of design, and so there would be little harm in reducing the minimum flow rate further. Reducing the flow rate below 30% of design just moved the location of the dumping closer to the diffuser. For very low diffuser flow rates (below 30% of the design flow rate), it is recommended that desks be placed away from the supply diffuser to avoid discomfort. Overall, the simulation results indicate that uniform temperatures are maintained in the room at flow rates as low as 15% of design except immediately under the diffuser. This suggests that the VAV minimum flow rates can be set below 30% of design flow as long as the diffuser is at least 1 m from an occupant’s position.

[1]  A. D. Gosman,et al.  The Flow Properties of Rooms With Small Ventilation Openings , 1980 .

[2]  P. Fanger,et al.  Perception of draught in ventilated spaces. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[3]  P. Fanger,et al.  Air turbulence and sensation of draught , 1988 .

[4]  Stuart O. Nelson.  MICROWAVE DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES OF FRESH ONIONS , 1992 .

[5]  Standard Ashrae.  Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[6]  Peter V. Nielsen.  Description of Supply Openings in Numerical Models for Room Air Distribution , 1992 .

[7]  Peter V. Nielsen,et al.  Room Air and Contaminant Flow, Evaluation of Computational Methods, Subtask-1 , 1993 .

[8]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Locally controlled air movement preferred in warm isothermal environments , 1994 .

[9]  Kjeld Svidt.  Investigation of Inlet Boundary Conditions for Numerical Prediction of Air Flow in Livestock Buildings , 1994 .

[10]  Qingyan Chen.  COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT k-ε MODELS FOR INDOOR AIR FLOW COMPUTATIONS , 1995 .

[11]  Hiroko Kubo,et al.  Cooling effects of preferred air velocity in muggy conditions , 1997 .

[12]  Tengfang T. Xu,et al.  A study of occupant cooling by personally controlled air movement , 1998 .

[13]  Jelena Srebric,et al.  A Method of Test to Obtain Diffuser Data for CFD Modeling of Room Airflow (RP-1009) , 2001 .

[14]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  Simplified Numerical Models for Complex Air Supply Diffusers , 2002 .

[15]  E Ery Djunaedy,et al.  Thermal comfort study of an air-conditioned lecture theatre in the tropics , 2003 .

[16]  Bernard Roux,et al.  Simulation of air flow in the IEA Annex 20 test room—validation of a simplified model for the nozzle diffuser in isothermal test cases , 2004 .

[17]  Gail Brager,et al.  Air movement preferences observed in office buildings , 2007, International journal of biometeorology.

[18]  Kwang-Chul Noh,et al.  Thermal comfort and indoor air quality in the lecture room with 4-way cassette air-conditioner and mixing ventilation system , 2007 .

[19]  Anastasios I. Stamou,et al.  Evaluation of thermal comfort in galatsi arena of the olympics ?Athens 2004? using a CFD model , 2008 .

[20]  M J Mendell,et al.  Indoor thermal factors and symptoms in office workers: findings from the US EPA BASE study. , 2008, Indoor air.

[21]  R. Dear,et al.  Air movement acceptability limits and thermal comfort in Brazil's hot humid climate zone , 2010 .

[22]  Donatien Njomo,et al.  Thermal comfort: A review paper , 2010 .

[23]  Hiroki Ono,et al.  THERMAL ENVIRONMENT PREDICTION USING CFD WITH A VIRTUAL MANNEQUIN MODEL AND EXPERIMENT WITH SUBJECT IN A FLOOR HEATING ROOM , 2011 .

[24]  Jianlei Niu,et al.  Thermal comfort models: A review and numerical investigation , 2012 .

[25]  Lorenzo Pagliano,et al.  A review of indices for the long-term evaluation of the general thermal comfort conditions in buildings , 2012 .

[26]  Martin Tenpierik,et al.  A review into thermal comfort in buildings , 2013 .

[27]  B. Olesen,et al.  Thermal comfort in commercial kitchens (RP-1469): Procedure and physical measurements (Part 1) , 2013 .

[28]  Y Zhu,et al.  Progress in thermal comfort research over the last twenty years. , 2013, Indoor air.

[29]  Nor Mariah Adam,et al.  Thermal comfort assessment and potential for energy efficiency enhancement in modern tropical buildings: A review , 2014 .

[30]  Denis Clodic,et al.  A Numerical Model for Simulating Thermal Comfort Prediction in Public Transportation Buses , 2014 .

[31]  Liu Yang,et al.  Thermal comfort and building energy consumption implications - A review , 2014 .

[32]  Roberto Lamberts,et al.  A review of human thermal comfort in the built environment , 2015 .