Timing of changes in the solar wind energy input in relation to ionospheric response

[1] We investigate four consecutive substorms using observations and global MHD simulation code GUMICS-4. The solar wind energy input is estimated by the epsilon parameter and evaluated from the simulation by direct integration of the energy transfer through the magnetopause. The ionospheric dissipation is estimated using the AE index and also evaluated by computing the Joule heating from both hemispheres in the simulation. Our results show that there is a clear and repeatable time delay between changes in the solar wind parameters and the energy input through the magnetopause. In the simulation, the Joule heating is quite directly driven by the energy input through the magnetopause, without any significant delays. The AE index shows two distinct responses: when the energy input through the magnetopause increases, the AE index responds with a delay; this can be interpreted as the growth phase. When the energy input decreases, the AE decreases simultaneously, without any significant delay. This indicates that after the onset, the energy input to the ionosphere is directly controlled by the energy input through the magnetopause. The results suggest that the recovery phase timing is determined by the solar wind parameters (with a delay associated with the magnetopause processes), while the onset timing is associated with internal magnetotail and/or magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling processes.

[1]  M. Lester,et al.  Magnetospheric feedback in solar wind energy transfer , 2010 .

[2]  Adrian Grocott,et al.  A superposed epoch analysis of auroral evolution during substorm growth, onset, and recovery , 2009 .

[3]  R. McPherron,et al.  A statistical study of the spatial structure of interplanetary magnetic field substorm triggers and their associated magnetic response , 2009 .

[4]  I. J. Rae,et al.  Tail Reconnection Triggering Substorm Onset , 2008, Science.

[5]  T. Pulkkinen,et al.  Energy as a tracer of magnetospheric processes: GUMICS-4 global MHD results and observations compared , 2008 .

[6]  R. McPherron,et al.  Response of the Earth's magnetosphere to changes in the solar wind , 2008 .

[7]  H. Koskinen,et al.  Continuous reconnection line and pressure-dependent energy conversion on the magnetopause in a global MHD model , 2007 .

[8]  T. Pulkkinen,et al.  Magnetopause energy and mass transfer: results from a global MHD simulation , 2006 .

[9]  A. Vaivads,et al.  Magnetospheric energy budget during huge geomagnetic activity using Cluster and ground‐based data , 2006 .

[10]  T. Pulkkinen,et al.  New interpretation of magnetospheric energy circulation , 2006 .

[11]  T. Pulkkinen,et al.  Hysteresis in solar wind power input to the magnetosphere , 2006 .

[12]  Pekka Janhunen,et al.  Assessment of ionospheric Joule heating by GUMICS-4 MHD simulation, AMIE, and satellite-based statistics: towards a synthesis , 2005 .

[13]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  Transition from substorm growth to substorm expansion phase as observed with a radial configuration of ISTP and Cluster spacecraft , 2005 .

[14]  Stephen E. Milan,et al.  Dayside and nightside contributions to the cross polar cap potential: placing an upper limit on a viscous-like interaction , 2004 .

[15]  H. Koskinen,et al.  Substorm energy budget during low and high solar activity: 1997 and 1999 compared , 2002 .

[16]  M. W. Dunlop,et al.  The Cluster Magnetic Field Investigation: overview of in-flight performance and initial results , 2001 .

[17]  I. Papamastorakis,et al.  First multispacecraft ion measurements in and near the Earth's magnetosphere with the identical Cluster ion spectrometry (CIS) experiment , 2001 .

[18]  D. Baker,et al.  Energy content in the storm time ring current , 2001 .

[19]  J. W. Griffee,et al.  Solar Wind Electron Proton Alpha Monitor (SWEPAM) for the Advanced Composition Explorer , 1998 .

[20]  Norman F. Ness,et al.  The ACE Magnetic Fields Experiment , 1998 .

[21]  D. Baker,et al.  Global energy deposition during the January 1997 magnetic cloud event , 1998 .

[22]  T. Mukai,et al.  Statistical analysis of the plasmoid evolution with Geotail observations , 1998 .

[23]  Pekka Janhunen,et al.  GUMICS-3 A Global Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Coupling Simulation with High Ionospheric Resolution , 1996 .

[24]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Magnetospheric field and current distributions during the substorm recovery phase , 1994 .

[25]  G. Gisler,et al.  High-Z energetic particles at geosynchronous orbit during the great solar proton event series of October 1989 , 1992 .

[26]  Daniel N. Baker,et al.  Magnetospheric Impulse Response for Many Levels of Geomagnetic Activity , 1985 .

[27]  Byung-Ho Ahn,et al.  The Joule heat production rate and the particle energy injection rate as a function of the geomagnetic indices AE and AL , 1983 .

[28]  Robert L. McPherron,et al.  Satellite studies of magnetospheric substorms on August 15, 1968. IX - Phenomenological model for substorms. , 1973 .

[29]  T. Pulkkinen,et al.  Stormtime energy transfer in global MHD simulation , 2003 .

[30]  Syun-Ichi Akasofu,et al.  Energy coupling between the solar wind and the magnetosphere , 1981 .