A Unifying Framework for Metapopulation Dynamics

Many biologically important processes, such as genetic differentiation, the spread of disease, and population stability, are affected by the (natural or enforced) subdivision of populations into networks of smaller, partly isolated, subunits. Such “metapopulations” can have extremely complex dynamics. We present a new general model that uses only two functions to capture, at the metapopulation scale, the main behavior of metapopulations. We show how complex, structured metapopulation models can be translated into our generalized framework. The metapopulation dynamics arising from some important biological processes are illustrated: the rescue effect, the Allee effect, and what we term the “antirescue effect.” The antirescue effect captures instances where high migration rates are deleterious to population persistence, a phenomenon that has been largely ignored in metapopulation conservation theory. Management regimes that ignore a significant antirescue effect will be inadequate and may actually increase extinction risk. Further, consequences of territoriality and conspecific attraction on metapopulation‐level dynamics are investigated. The new, simplified framework can incorporate knowledge from epidemiology, genetics, and population biology in a phenomenological way. It opens up new possibilities to identify and analyze the factors that are important for the evolution and persistence of the many spatially subdivided species.

[1]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Single-Species Spatial Dynamics May Contribute to Long-Term Rarity and Commonness , 1985 .

[2]  A. Hastings,et al.  Within‐Patch Dynamics in a Metapopulation , 1989 .

[3]  Adam Kleczkowski,et al.  Seasonality and extinction in chaotic metapopulations , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  H. B. Wilson,et al.  4. The Dynamics of Spatially Distributed Host-Parasitoid Systems , 1998 .

[5]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Risk assessment in conservation biology , 1993 .

[6]  G. Luikart,et al.  Habitat loss: ecological, evolutionary and genetic consequences , 2000 .

[7]  J. Vandermeer,et al.  Metapopulation Dynamics and the Quality of the Matrix , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[8]  H. Caswell THEORY AND MODELS IN ECOLOGY: A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE , 1988 .

[9]  A. Troumbis,et al.  Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species , 2001 .

[10]  E. Rolán-Alvarez,et al.  THE MAINTENANCE OF A CLINE IN THE MARINE SNAIL LITTORINA SAXATILIS: THE ROLE OF HOME SITE ADVANTAGE AND HYBRID FITNESS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  7 – From Metapopulation Dynamics to Community Structure: Some Consequences of Spatial Heterogeneity , 1997 .

[12]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[13]  Mats Gyllenberg,et al.  Two General Metapopulation Models and the Core-Satellite Species Hypothesis , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[14]  R. Levins Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control , 1969 .

[15]  N. Gotelli,et al.  A general model of metapopulation dynamics , 1993 .

[16]  I. Hanski A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics , 1994 .

[17]  W. C. Allee Animal Aggregations: A Study in General Sociology , 1931 .

[18]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[19]  W. C. Allee Animal aggregations, a study in general sociology. / by W. C. Allee. , 1931 .

[20]  Andrew D. Taylor Metapopulations, Dispersal, and Predator‐Prey Dynamics: An Overview , 1990 .

[21]  R. Holt From Metapopulation Dynamics to Community Structure , 1997 .

[22]  M. Nowak,et al.  Habitat destruction and the extinction debt , 1994, Nature.

[23]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis , 1982 .

[24]  I. Hanski,et al.  Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation , 1998, Nature.

[25]  R. Lacy Loss of Genetic Diversity from Managed Populations: Interacting Effects of Drift, Mutation, Immigration, Selection, and Population Subdivision , 1987 .

[26]  James F. Quinn,et al.  Correlated environments and the persistence of metapopulations , 1989 .

[27]  I. Hanski,et al.  Migration, Metapopulation Dynamics and Fugitive Co-existence , 1993 .

[28]  R. May Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states , 1977, Nature.

[29]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  NEUTRAL GENETIC DIVERSITY IN A METAPOPULATION WITH RECURRENT LOCAL EXTINCTION AND RECOLONIZATION , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  R. Lande,et al.  EXTINCTION TIMES IN FINITE METAPOPULATION MODELS WITH STOCHASTIC LOCAL DYNAMICS , 1998 .

[31]  A. Hastings,et al.  Metapopulation Dynamics and Genetics , 1994 .

[32]  W. Schaffer,et al.  Chaos reduces species extinction by amplifying local population noise , 1993, Nature.

[33]  H. Caswell,et al.  The effects of habitat destruction in finite landscapes: a chain‐binomial metapopulation model , 2001 .

[34]  Mats Gyllenberg,et al.  Structured Metapopulation Models , 1997 .